7%

All things philosophical, related to belief and / or religions of any and all sorts.
Personal philosophy welcomed.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

7%

Post by Gob »


One in 14 Catholic priests accused of abuse in Australia



Sydney (AFP) - Seven percent of Catholic priests were accused of abusing children in Australia between 1950 and 2010 but the allegations were never investigated, "shocking and indefensible" data showed Monday during an inquiry into paedophilia in the church.

The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse heard that 4,444 alleged incidents of pedophilia were reported to church authorities and in some dioceses, more than 15 percent of priests were perpetrators.

Australia ordered the Royal Commission in 2012 after a decade of growing pressure to investigate allegations of child abuse across the country, with the inquiry now in its final phase after four years of hearings.

"Between 1950 and 2010, overall seven percent of priests were alleged perpetrators," said Gail Furness, the lawyer leading questioning at the inquiry in Sydney.

"The accounts were depressingly similar. Children were ignored or worse, punished. Allegations were not investigated. Priests and religious (figures) were moved," she added.

"The parishes or communities to which they were moved knew nothing of their past. Documents were not kept or they were destroyed. Secrecy prevailed as did cover ups."

The average age of the victims at the time was 10 for girls and 11 for boys.

Of the 1,880 alleged perpetrators, 90 percent were men.

The St John of God Brothers religious order was the worst, with just over 40 percent of members accused of abuse.

The commission has spoken to thousands of survivors and heard claims of child abuse involving churches, orphanages, sporting clubs, youth groups and schools.

The church in Australia set up the Truth, Justice and Healing Council to coordinate its response.

"These numbers are shocking, they are tragic, they are indefensible," its chief executive Francis Sullivan told the commission.

"This data, along with all we have heard over the past four years, can only be interpreted for what it is: a massive failure on the part of the Catholic Church in Australia to protect children from abusers.

"As Catholics we hang our heads in shame."
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: 7%

Post by rubato »

Further proof that religion must never again be allowed any power in civil society.

They are amoral.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11532
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: 7%

Post by Crackpot »

Accusation equals guilt now?
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19489
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: 7%

Post by BoSoxGal »

No, but the incidence of falsified accusation of child sexual abuse is very, very low - at very least children should be believed as a default position. A good forensic interviewer can determine fairly accurately if the child isn't being honest. Most of them are telling the truth.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: 7%

Post by rubato »

Crackpot wrote:Accusation equals guilt now?

Denial equals innocence now?


Did you see 'Spotlight"???


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: 7%

Post by Lord Jim »

Image
ImageImageImage

Big RR
Posts: 14639
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: 7%

Post by Big RR »

Even if most of the accusations were false (and there is no evidence of that), this
The accounts were depressingly similar. Children were ignored or worse, punished. Allegations were not investigated. Priests and religious (figures) were moved," she added.

"The parishes or communities to which they were moved knew nothing of their past. Documents were not kept or they were destroyed. Secrecy prevailed as did cover ups."
is still indefensible.

Ignoring allegations, refusing to investigate, transferring priests to new parishes where they could offend again without even putting the parish on notice of the allegations appears to be par for the course for the RVC church, and that is indefensible. As for destroying documents--one wonders why documents which showed they acted appropriately were not kept. I would think it is very likely that there were none.

User avatar
Crackpot
Posts: 11532
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:59 am
Location: Michigan

Re: 7%

Post by Crackpot »

You do realize that both the 7% number could be high (possibly very high) and[/] the vast majority of cases can be true at the same time right?
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.

Post Reply