Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Big RR
Posts: 14911
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by Big RR »

It, and now both sides will have to deal with that fact.

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

Weren't they like that at the turn of the century anyway? Some rule change in 2003 comes to mind (although I was probably drunk so I forgive me if I am remembering incorrectly)
:shrug

Big RR
Posts: 14911
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by Big RR »

oldr--my recollection of the filibuster is that it was around since the beginning of the senate, but rules for cloture (cutting off debate) did not appear until the early 20th century (originally 66 or 67 votes, then 60). As I recall, however, fillibusters could be regulated by refusing to grant any courtesy to those continuing the debate, making them continue for hours without any break, and then ruling that the senator yielded the floor if (s)he stopped speaking to use the restrooms or eat or whatever).

I'm not sure when the nuclear option rule became official, but now all judicial nominees can be voted on, and debate closed, by a simple majority vote.

liberty
Posts: 4954
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: Colonial Possession

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by liberty »

Sue U wrote:
liberty wrote:Having to do with an appointment of a federal official. M (can’t remember spelling) verses Madison.
Marbury v. Madison. And while an appointment to federal office (justice of the peace for the District of Columbia) was the matter at issue, the decision is important not because of that, but because it declared the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional to the extent it broadened the jurisdiction of federal courts beyond what was set out under Article III.

Was John Marshall a tyrant? Were Madison, Jefferson and Adams ignorant of constitutional function?
No Marshal was not a tyrant, but there is big difference between interpreting where there is room to interpret and changing the meaning. And I agree with the precedent; someone has interpret when the meaning is not clear.
Soon, I’ll post my farewell message. The end is starting to get close. There are many misconceptions about me, and before I go, to live with my ancestors on the steppes, I want to set the record straight.

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9102
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by Sue U »

Guinevere wrote:It's all a moot point now anyway, McConnell went nuclear.
Image
GAH!

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9102
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by Sue U »

liberty wrote:No Marshal was not a tyrant, but there is big difference between interpreting where there is room to interpret and changing the meaning.
In what case has the Supreme Court "chang[ed] the meaning" of the Constitution?
GAH!

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by Guinevere »

Sue U wrote:
Guinevere wrote:It's all a moot point now anyway, McConnell went nuclear.
Image
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Perfection.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by rubato »

Sue U wrote:
Guinevere wrote:It's all a moot point now anyway, McConnell went nuclear.
Image


Nooooooo! Not the turtle! Not the turtle!


If McConnell were a turtle he would be sincere and nice.

(ok He could be a snapping turtle, they bite off toes, fingers and any other part that sticks out. As well as snacking on baby ducks and baby box turtles. They bad)


yrs,
rubato







yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9102
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by Sue U »

rubato wrote: (ok He could be a snapping turtle, they bite off toes, fingers and any other part that sticks out. As well as snacking on baby ducks and baby box turtles. They bad)
But delicious.

Image
GAH!

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

Poor turtle. :(

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9796
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by Bicycle Bill »

rubato wrote:Nooooooo! Not the turtle! Not the turtle!

If McConnell were a turtle he would be sincere and nice.   #TurtleLivesMatter

(ok He could be a snapping turtle, they bite off toes, fingers and any other part that sticks out. As well as snacking on baby ducks and baby box turtles. They bad)

yrs,
rubato
FIFY, rubato.  You forgot the Twatter hashtag.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by rubato »

Don't mock the turtle!


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9796
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by Bicycle Bill »

Sue U wrote:
rubato wrote: (ok He could be a snapping turtle, they bite off toes, fingers and any other part that sticks out. As well as snacking on baby ducks and baby box turtles. They bad)
But delicious.

Image
You know, don't you, that there is another meaning to the word "snapper"?
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9102
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by Sue U »

Bicycle Bill wrote:You know, don't you, that there is another meaning to the word "snapper"?
Not in Philadelphia there's not.
GAH!

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20058
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by BoSoxGal »

I listened to the vote this morning on CSPAN radio en route to a physician appointment and I will admit I got choked up and tearful. Could be crazy menopause hormones, but I felt like it was the final death knell of the Congress I grew up fascinated by and passionate about. I went to law school in D.C. in '97 with the expectation of eventually becoming a legislative staff attorney, but became profoundly jaded by the actions of the Gingrich revolution's highly partisan Republicunts which I (along with far more learned pundits) mark as the beginning of the profound dysfunction in Congress. It seemed like the Senate was the last hope for civility and a cure for all that, but this really felt like a last nail in the coffin. Given what has been taking place at the state level, with ALEC infiltration of our legislatures and gerrymandering, I am losing hope for a brighter future for regular people.

:(
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Big RR
Posts: 14911
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by Big RR »

What I'm more concerned with is as the legislative dysfunction increases, it makes it much more likely for some glib talking idiot to come in and take over everything because congress is merely ineffective. And de,mocracy will die not with shots and screams, but thunderous idiotic applause.

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20058
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by BoSoxGal »

Image
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by Guinevere »

Image
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by RayThom »

It's official. Duh!
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5808
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Gorsuch Confirmation Hearings

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

Gorsuch confirmed. And even though I am one of those who thought that he was perhaps the best we could hope for from this so-called 'president' I am appalled by the process. And I do not think that those accusations of plagiarism we minor. In a scientific context (don't know about legal) if you are quoting a secondary author who is quoting a primary, you always cite them both. The NYT gets this spectacularly wrong:
The confirmation was also a vindication of the bare-knuckled strategy of Senate Republicans, who refused even to consider President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court pick, Judge Merrick B. Garland, saying the choice of the next justice should belong to the next president
No it fucking is not a vindication of the refusal to consider Garland.

Post Reply