Charlottesville

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9796
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Bicycle Bill »

Scooter wrote:If there was any doubt that all Confederate monuments should be razed to the ground, what happened here should put them to rest. These are the sorts of scum that worship at these shrines to racism and slavery (and always have).
Right, Scooter.  Scrape R.E. Lee's name off of "Washington and Lee University" in Lexington VA, too, and burn down the Custis-Lee Mansion at Arlington National Cemetery while you're at it.

Only the winners get monuments and recognition.
Image
-"BB-"
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Charlottesville

Post by rubato »

The Russians blew up Nazi monuments after WWII and the Iraqis pulled down statues of Saddam. When the losers were serving evil, like Lee, they do not deserve to be memorialized and sentimentalized.

We keep faith with history by tearing down shrines to evil, not by leaving them up. Osama Bin Laden was dumped at sea just so that his grave would never be such a shrine.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Econoline »

Interesting historical fact: that specific statue of Robert E. Lee in Charlottesville—the removal of which caused the protests—dates to 1924. The same year as the "Racial Integrity Act."

Tell me again about just what "heritage" the statue was meant to commemorate.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Lord Jim »

Some more information is starting to come out about Fields...

The picture of a loner/loser with unhealthy obsessions, poor social skills, simmering resentments, and mental health issues is beginning to emerge...(big surprise)
Rally murder suspect is an Army dropout ‘infatuated with Nazis’

The man charged with plowing his car into a group of protesters during a white-supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va., was “very infatuated with Nazis” — and once in the US Army, according to his former high-school teacher and military records.

Derek Weimer, who taught history to suspected killer James Alex Fields Jr. at Randall K. Cooper High School in Union, Ky., told WCPO-TV that Fields had “radical ideas on race.”

Weimer said Fields always wanted to join the Army. Military records show that Fields entered the Army on Aug. 18, 2015 — with his mother writing on Facebook about him beginning boot camp — then dropped out Dec. 11, the New York Times reported. It’s unclear why he left.

But Weimer said it was because of mental-health issues.

“It was because of a history of anti-psychotic medication that was prescribed,” Weimer said.


“And when you bring that into the picture, and you bring the views … of Nazism and white supremacy — and who knows what he was experiencing once he left this area and went up north in Ohio — like who he was hanging around with and stuff, you start to see how it is like this perfect storm. It comes together, and you get an incident like this.”

A now-deleted Facebook page believed to have belonged to Fields included several photos reflecting his white supremacist views.

One was an image of Adolf Hitler as a baby and another showed “Pepe the Frog,” an anthropomorphic frog character that has been used as an alt-right symbol.

Still another shows Syrian President Bashar al-Assad — for whom some alt-right activists have recently expressed support — with the word “undefeated” in capital letters.
http://nypost.com/2017/08/13/rally-murd ... ith-nazis/
ImageImageImage

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20059
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Charlottesville

Post by BoSoxGal »

Image
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21469
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Charlottesville

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

This
Less than a half-hour after Trump’s live remarks, the Daily Stormer had declared the president’s words as a signal of tacit support for their side:

Trump comments were good. He didn’t attack us. He just said the nation should come together. Nothing specific against us.

He said that we need to study why people are so angry, and implied that there was hate … on both sides!

So he implied the antifa are haters.

There was virtually no counter-signaling of us at all.

He said he loves us all.

The neo-Nazi live blog also noted that Trump had refused to respond when a reporter asked about white nationalists who supported him.

“No condemnation at all,” the Daily Stormer wrote. “When asked to condemn, [Trump] just walked out of the room. Really, really good. God bless him.” As reported in Washington Post
This, Mr. President, is why your remarks thus far are divisive, disgusting and downright exploitative - trying to stay pals with fascist bully boys.

Robert E Lee would have been appalled by you and your friends.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5808
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Charlottesville

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

Here in Columbia MO (which in November was one three blue dots in a very red state) we have a Ulysses S Grant Elementary School and a Robert E Lee Elementary school. According to Wikipedia "Missouri was a border state and sent many men to the armies on both sides. Nearly 110,000 men fought for the Union, while about 40,000 served the Confederacy. They fought both in Missouri and in other states."

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Econoline »

“Anyone who cannot name the enemy is not fit to be President.”
— Donald Trump
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Guinevere »

Not OUR President

Excerpt:
And maybe that is what we have, in fact, become. For Donald Trump’s refusal to condemn the murderous white supremacists in Charlottesville finally confirms what has become increasingly obvious: The current president of the United States isn’t a real American.

Real Americans understand that our nation is built around values, not the “blood and soil” of the marchers’ chants; what makes you an American is your attempt to live up to those values, not the place or race your ancestors came from. And when we fall short in our effort to live up to our ideals, as we all too often do, at least we realize and acknowledge our failure.
More:
Finally, real Americans who manage to achieve high office realize that they are servants of the people, meant to use their position for the public good. In practice, human nature being what it is, many officials have in fact taken financial advantage of their office. But we’ve always understood that this was wrong — and presidents, in particular, are supposed to be above such things. Now we have a leader who is transparently exploiting his office for personal enrichment, in ways that all too obviously amount in practice to influence-buying by domestic malefactors and foreign governments alike.

In short, these days we have a president who is really, truly, deeply un-American, someone who doesn’t share the values and ideals that made this country special.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Lord Jim »

Who said:
"The Nazis, the KKK, and white supremacists are repulsive and evil, and all of us have a moral obligation to speak out against the lies, bigotry, anti-Semitism, and hatred that they propagate. Having watched the horrifying video of the car deliberately crashing into a crowd of protesters, I urge the Department of Justice to immediately investigate and prosecute this grotesque act of domestic terrorism,"
John Lewis? Elizabeth Warren? Bernie Sanders?

Try Ted Cruz....

Even Ted friggin' Cruz manages to get this one right, but not the Dog Whistler-In-Chief...

ETA:
"There should be no place in society for racism, white supremacy and neo-nazis," Trump tweeted.
That was of course Ivanka Trump, not Daddy Don...

Il Boobce, who's happy to re-tweet all kinds of vileness and nonsense, somehow couldn't even bring himself to re-tweet that , let alone say anything on his own...
Last edited by Lord Jim on Mon Aug 14, 2017 1:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21469
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Charlottesville

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Racism is not one of "many sides". White supremacist bigotry and violence is not a "side". There is no "side" consisting of neo-Nazi terrorists.

There is only the enemy of democracy; the antithesis of humanity; the disease of ignorance and the shame of gangsterism to be found in the kinds of people who traveled to Charlottesville to attack America and Americans who bravely stood against the filth that Trump calls just one of many "sides".

I tend to believe that he departed from the script - it was an ad-lib - because he'd seen photos in which (come on, be honest) it would be difficult to tell the difference between shield-carrying racists in bone domes and shield-carrying anti-racists in bone domes. In his mind (?), those are two "sides" - both of them prepared for and engaging in violence. Perhaps he thinks (?) that a fascist protest march under a permit should be allowed to proceed unmolested as if it were just another "side" peacefully demonstrating. Perhaps he believes (?) that free speech includes anti-Semitic and racist language, assaulting people with tiki-torches and responding to counter-protest by vehicular homicide.

If he belies any of that, he is not fit to remain in office. He has not the mental ability to see truth, much less speak it.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Big RR
Posts: 14911
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Big RR »

that free speech includes anti-Semitic and racist language
Have to disagree with you there--that is the essence of free speech IMHO, as is anti-skinhead rhetoric or anything else. Assault and murder clearly are not free speech, nor is an incitement to immediate violence (nor shouting fir in a crowded theater for that matter); but saying unpopular things, however repugnant, is the essence of free speech, and I wouldn't have it any other way. I particularly wouldn't have the government making the call as to what sort of political speech is acceptable and what is not. Accept that and you'll soon lose any semblance of democracy. Which is why, IMHO, the ACLU weighed in on the sides of the white supremacists in holding the rally in the first place.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Lord Jim »

I'm with Big RR on that one...

But none of that excuses the President of the United States from the moral leadership responsibility for denouncing appropriately the central outrage that occurred in Charlottesville on Saturday; the terrorist murder carried out by a white supremacist, nor does it excuse him for being unable to denounce white supremacists, the KKK and neo-nazis, regardless of what free speech rights these purveyors of hate enjoy.
ImageImageImage

Big RR
Posts: 14911
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Big RR »

And I agree with Jim on that point. There's no excuse for that or for Trump's backpedaling; it's the president's job to speak out.

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Guinevere »

Yes, I'm with Jim and BigRR. Furthermore his ridiculous comments just underscore how unfit the Trumpanzee is and how little he understands the basic principles underlying our government.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Lord Jim »

During a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Va. on Saturday, former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke said the event is in line with President Trump’s “promises.”

“This represents a turning point for the people of this country. We are determined to take our country back,” Duke said. “We are going to fulfill the promises of Donald Trump. That’s what we believed in. That’s why we voted for Donald Trump, because he said he’s going to take our country back.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) explained yesterday, “These groups seem to believe they have a friend in Donald Trump in the White House.”

Indeed, after the president delivered remarks that failed to denounce the bigots specifically, a neo-Nazi publication celebrated, perceiving Trump’s comments as implicit support. “No condemnation at all,” it said. “When asked to condemn, he just walked out of the room. Really, really good. God bless him.”

To be sure, it’s tempting not to give a damn what the lunatic fringe has to say, but when white supremacists look at a sitting president as a kindred spirit, it’s all the more incumbent on the White House to do something about it.

In other words, when white supremacists see Trump as a source of inspiration, Trump’s responsibility to condemn these supporters becomes more acute.

As former Ambassador Michael McFaul put it over the weekend in a message to the president, “If white supremacists are praising your statement … maybe you should try again.”[Ya think?]
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show ... iend-trump
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Lord Jim »

I suspect there's a fair chance, that sometime within the next couple of days, because the political pressure has become some so intense, Trump may very well issue or make some brief one sentence statement (like he did when he finally got around to renouncing David Duke, and when he finally admitted that Obama was born in the US) like "I renounce white supremacists, the KKK, and neo-Nazis"....

But he certainly wont launch a tweet storm about it, or dwell on it any way, and by then the dog-whistle message will already have been sent to the dogs by his days of silence....
ImageImageImage

Big RR
Posts: 14911
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Charlottesville

Post by Big RR »

I think that's what Pence tried to do for him with his statements, but let's see what Trump does. Maybe he'll hire Duke as a spokesman instead?

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5808
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Charlottesville

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

Karl Popper write the following in The Open Society and its Enemies:
Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right even to suppress them, for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to anything as deceptive as rational argument, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, exactly as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping; or as we should consider incitement to the revival of the slave trade.
Popper is best known as a philosopher of science and he pushed the idea that the potential for falsification is the discriminator between science and non-science. I think he here expressed very clearly the limits of tolerance and why therefore freedom of speech is not an absolute. Growing up as he did in 1930s Austria I rather think that he had some real world understanding of the issues. We all know intellectually that you are not free to yell 'Fire!" in a crowded theatre and that you are not free to come, uninvited, into my living room and make a speech. Why not? Because the consequences of that speech run headlong into other freedoms: my right to live and not be crushed by panicking theatre-goers, or my right to enjoy the cricket on my TV without having to listen to your views on baseball, Bartok or the bimetallic problem. Freedom of speech has its limits: and I would not have marched with the ACLU in Skokie.

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21469
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Charlottesville

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Perhaps he believes (?) that free speech includes anti-Semitic and racist language, assaulting people with tiki-torches and responding to counter-protest by vehicular homicide.
For Big RR and redundant "agrees":

I am well aware that free-speech encompasses language (that's why it's called 'speech') so there's no need to disagree with me.

But free speech does not include language used as incitement to violence, assault and homicide. That is why I wrote ONE sentence linking those things; a sentence that is not to be broken into pieces. Had I wished to indicate three separate things I would have used "either/or" instead of "and".

Thank you.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Post Reply