Texas Church Massacre

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9135
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by Sue U »

This is not primarily a "mental health issue." This incident, like virtually all shootings, is a too-many-people-with-too-easy-access-to-too-many-guns issue. Other countries have "mental health issues" (although frankly they are better dealt with in countries that have universal medical care), but they don't have even a small fraction of the number of shootings the U.S. has. The sick gun fetishism of this country is stoked by the NRA and the gun manufacturers, who prey on the ignorance and knee-jerk reaction of "Second Amendment supporters." The cynically induced helplessness of the people and the cowardice of their elected officials is on full display after every one of these mass shootings. These are not unpreventable incidents and it is not "too soon" to "politicize" them into effective action.
GAH!

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

Texas Church Massacre

Post by RayThom »

Image
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

liberty
Posts: 4996
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: Colonial Possession

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by liberty »

Guinevere wrote:I never said ban, and I wouldn't put that much effort into such trash. But engaging him only stimulates more reprehensible and offensive posting that the rest of us have to wade through.

I can ignore him just fine, but in the whole I'd much prefer to have wes, however misguided, than this lying, evil, crap.
Well, let’s see by your standard I am evil because I say things you don’t want to hear; you don’t have to read it. I am still going to write it, but you don’t have to read it.

You have an odd standard of evil: I am evil even though I have never intentionally, except in self-defense, hurt anyone in my life and I try to do good in the world. I bet you have a lot more money than me, so do you donate money and I am not talking about the animal welfare fund, but something like St. Jude Children’s hospital.

I am evil for saying things you don’t like, but ANTIFA that attack and beat up old trump supporters are not evil. You have a strange idea of what is evil and not evil or at least I have never heard you condemn ANTIFA.
Soon, I’ll post my farewell message. The end is starting to get close. There are many misconceptions about me, and before I go, to live with my ancestors on the steppes, I want to set the record straight.

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15475
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by Joe Guy »

liberty wrote:I am evil for saying things you don’t like, but ANTIFA that attack and beat up old trump supporters are not evil. You have a strange idea of what is evil and not evil or at least I have never heard you condemn ANTIFA.
You've always had odd ideas but now you're spreading odder fodder.

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9135
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by Sue U »

liberty wrote:Well, let’s see by your standard I am evil because I say things you don’t want to hear; you don’t have to read it. I am still going to write it, but you don’t have to read it.
Guin can certainly speak for herself (and I'm sure she will), but I don't think she said that you, personally, are evil (although I stand to be corrected), but the drivel you spew around this board is certainly pointlessly vile and frequently racist. I used to chalk it up to sheer ignorance, but since you clearly and steadfastly refuse to learn a goddamn thing despite years of patiently pointing you to, you know, facts and stuff, I have come to the conclusion that you are either willfully stupid or straight-up trolling (and badly). Either way, your posts deserve little to no attention, except as objects of ridicule. You used to talk about how honor was so important to you; if that were actually true, you wouldn't be making the idiotic and vicious assertions of "what liberals think" with which you foul the board.
liberty wrote:You have an odd standard of evil: I am evil even though I have never intentionally, except in self-defense, hurt anyone in my life and I try to do good in the world. I bet you have a lot more money than me, so do you donate money and I am not talking about the animal welfare fund, but something like St. Jude Children’s hospital.

I am evil for saying things you don’t like, but ANTIFA that attack and beat up old trump supporters are not evil. You have a strange idea of what is evil and not evil or at least I have never heard you condemn ANTIFA.
Your attempt to derail the issue at hand with whataboutism is poorly played, transparent and lame. You are not good at this and you should stop.
GAH!

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5842
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

A lot of things to unpack in this topic. I see from the NYT that they are reporting now that Kelley escaped from a mental health facility five years ago. And then -
Later that year, Mr. Kelley pleaded guilty in a military court to repeated assaults on his wife and her son, a toddler, including one that left the boy with a fractured skull. He was sentenced to a year in a Navy prison.
I don't think that we are going to upset UCMJ. But can someone tell me why, for a crime which is civilian in nature such as domestic violence, it is tried in a military court? Of course there are crimes which are purely military in nature, or I can imagine that there are crimes in which the accused's status as a soldier (etc.) might be relevant -- e.g., PTSD -- but if an airman is caught doing 60 in downtown San Diego, does he automatically go before a military judge?

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5842
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

Per CNN:
Seoul (CNN)President Donald Trump said Tuesday "there would have been no difference three days ago" in the deadly Texas shooting if an extreme vetting policy for gun ownership had been in place.

"If you did what you're suggesting there would have been no difference three days ago, and you might not have had that very brave person who happened to have a gun in his truck and shoot him, and hit him and neutralize him," Trump said responding to a question during a joint news conference with South Korean President Moon Jae-in.
I agree with the first part of his sentence: it's not the vetting which will stop a determined from getting hold of a weapon (it might slow him down) but curtailing the ready availability. And to say, as he does in his second part, that it's better to have a policy in place which allows someone to shoot and kill 26 people before a good guy with a gun neutralizes him than a policy in which neither has a gun, is just plain daft.

User avatar
datsunaholic
Posts: 2704
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 12:53 am
Location: The Wet Coast

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by datsunaholic »

ex-khobar Andy wrote: I don't think that we are going to upset UCMJ. But can someone tell me why, for a crime which is civilian in nature such as domestic violence, it is tried in a military court?
Could be as simple as where it happened. If they were living in on-base housing, for example.
Death is Nature's way of telling you to slow down.

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20169
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by BoSoxGal »

USCMJ is a complex area of law; military personnel are very often subject to dual sovereignty criminal prosecution, depending on many factors - in this way military personnel don’t have the same absolute protection against double jeopardy that civilians do.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20169
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by BoSoxGal »

Heads really need to roll over the failure to include this guy in the NCIC - not that it matters to a devastated Texas town that will never, ever be the same.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... vin-kelley
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Burning Petard
Posts: 4627
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Near Bear, Delaware

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by Burning Petard »

I repeat myself. It happened four years ago. No heads will roll, any more than heads will roll for the decision to enlist Bowe Bergdahl in the Army.

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9823
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by Bicycle Bill »

liberty wrote:I am evil for saying things you don’t like, but ANTIFA that attack and beat up old trump supporters are not evil. You have a strange idea of what is evil and not evil or at least I have never heard you condemn ANTIFA.
I'd rather be a member of some shadow organization known as 'the ANTIFA' than be an ignorant asshole who believes that "God, Guts, and Guns Made America Great", "White is Always Right", and that we need to return to the days of robber barons and unfettered capitalism, Tammany Hall-style politics, the marginalization of women and other large segments of the populace, and a total absence of regulations on industry and finance if we're ever going to "Make America Great Again" .... and is perfectly willing to employ whatever means are required — including violence — to achieve these ends.

My understanding is that 'ANTIFA' is a made-up word to refer to people who are opposed to groups that generally espouse far-right-wing attitudes like those usually found in organizations like the Klan or the American Nazi Party, and was created by taking the term 'anti-fascist' and lopping off the last five letters — not an actual organization that had adopted it as their moniker.   By that definition, every one of the soldiers that landed on the beachheads of Normand, Italy, or Iwo Jima were card-carrying members of 'the ANTIFA'.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20169
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by BoSoxGal »

Yay! Someone finally gets it right! Another non-asshole point in your favor, BB!

Antifa is not an organized group; it is every person of every walk of life, civilian and military, who detests fascism in any form. The modern tradition of anti-fascist protesting, activism, taking up of arms goes back to post-WWI.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newyor ... antifa/amp

Antifa isn’t defined by violent college protests; it’s people like me, and ultimately push come to shove, I hope it includes people like you, too.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by rubato »

The word "antifa" has appeared only very recently and I cannot tell what actual living group of people it refers to, if it does, or if it is like Rush Limbaugh's use of the words "liberal" and "feminist" which refer only to fictional groups of people.

The word is often associated with the group formerly known as "anarchists" who are a group of people who show up to demonstrations just to stir shit and cause vandalism but have no relationship to liberals, leftists &c. All moral people are anti-fascist but don't deserve to be associated with "antifa"


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by dales »

:clap: right on, rube!

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20169
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by BoSoxGal »

Clearly neither of you read the article I linked and you’d prefer living in your own reality.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by dales »

Better than living in your reality! :lol:

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

Jarlaxle
Posts: 5445
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:21 am
Location: New England

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by Jarlaxle »

BoSoxGal wrote:Heads really need to roll over the failure to include this guy in the NCIC - not that it matters to a devastated Texas town that will never, ever be the same.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... vin-kelley
Everyone involved should be court martialled as accessories before the fact to murder.
Treat Gaza like Carthage.

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by Econoline »

Image
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Texas Church Massacre

Post by Guinevere »

Perfect. But horrifyingly sad.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

Post Reply