Which party despises 95% of their own voters?

[rubato]

Oh, go ahead and guess:

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/20 ... -cuts.html

Grassley Opposes Tax Cuts for Non-Wealthy People Who Would Just Spend It on ‘Booze or Women or Movies’
By
Ed Kilgore

The very senior Republican comes clean on how he feels about the economic value of po’ folks. Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call,Inc.

Chuck Grassley has been in the U.S. Senate for 37 years. At the end of his current term, he will be 89 years old. So perhaps he’s beyond worrying about his popularity among Iowa voters, and is just saying things other Republicans think but generally don’t say out loud. During an interview with the Des Moines Register, Grassley was confronted with evidence that the usual “family farms” defense of an estate tax repeal is, well, not true.

Every once in a while their true feelings leak out like Mitts infamous '47% are all grifters' comment.

They say it in words rarely but in deeds it informs every political choice they have made in >30 years.

yrs,
rubato

[BoSoxGal]

Or, you know, rent/mortgage, utilities, transportation costs, groceries, toiletries, clothing, children and childcare costs, students loans, medical debt, taxes and now MORE TAXES, etc.

The last movie I saw was Manchester by the Sea at the cheap matinee, and before that, it was Lincoln in 2012 - because the movies are freaking expensive! I’m beyond stoked that I just signed up for MoviePass at $9.95/mo. and will be going to the theater once a week or even more for just that one price! I’ll still be sneaking in my own snacks and only occasionally buying the heart attack inducing popcorn because it’s too damned expensive!

Forget booze and women, I can’t afford those.


Fuck you Senator Grassley!

[Guinevere]

Just when you think the GOP cannot get any more bizzare (or condescending). Thank heaven for Wonkette, maybe we can laugh through our tears.

https://wonkette.com/626573/if-you-didn ... er-do-well

Excerpt:

In her autobiography, which I have read approximately 37 times, Tallulah Bankhead said, “My father warned me about men and booze, but he never mentioned a word about women and cocaine.” This weekend, Senator Chuck Grassley told the Des Moines Register, “I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing, as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.” These quotes may seem unrelated outside of subject matter, but they sure both say a lot about the people who said them.

Yes, if only these dewdroppers were more responsible, stayed away from the dance halls and the picture show, they too could amass a savings of $11 million to pass on to their heirs, tax-free. At the very least, they would not be poor. Or they’d be poor, but they’d be the kind of poor people Sen. Chuck Grassley could have a little respect for. When Chuck Grassley looks at a poor person, he wants to see someone who is truly miserable all the time, with no need for any kind of momentary escape from said misery. Like monks, or nuns. You know, the good kind of poor people.

Alas, it seems he is not considering the plight of the women in this situation, nor the actual economic impact of such asecetism. One tomato we spoke to said:

“I work at the Palace Ball Room–but gee, that palace is cheap. When I get back to my chilly hall room, I’m much too tired to sleep. I’m one of those lady teachers, a beautiful hostess you know. The kind the Palace features at exactly a dime a throw.

Ten cents a dance, that’s what they pay me. Gosh, how they weigh me down. Ten cents a dance, pansies and rough guys, tough guys who tear my gown.”

Golly, Mr. Grassley! Howsa dame like that gonna save up for knee rouge, never mind amass a cool $11 million, if the sailors stop coming ’round? Won’t someone think of the ladies?

With that dime, that kind of gal could go out and buy a brand new pair of stockings to cover her gams! Then, that money could go to the drug store owner, who could then pay the clerk who rings them up, who could then spend that money on booze, allowing the local barkeep to pay their his rent. It may not be the kind of investing Sen. Grassley is thinking of, but it’s an investment nonetheless.

Of course, serious investing isn’t always a surefire way to keep a fortune either. One man, who identified himself only as someone who used to be called “Al,” claims he invested in both railroads and towers and has since found himself broke and living in a Hooverville:

“They used to tell me I was building a dream, with peace and glory ahead. Why should I be standing in line, just waiting for bread? Once I built a railroad, made it run, made it race against time. Once I built a railroad, now it’s done. Brother, can you spare a dime?”

Jazz standards aside, what Sen. Grassley — who has clearly never seen an episode of My Super Sweet Sixteen in his whole life (possibly because he thinks it is still 1932?) — is asserting here is that poor people would not be poor if only they would be miserable, and that the kind of things poor people spend their money on are stupid and irresponsible as compared to the things rich people spend their money on.

[Sue U]

With corporations already sitting on mountains of cash, why are Republicans insisting that they need a tax cut subsidized by individual taxpayers that adds another 1-2T to the national debt? Why do we need to cut Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and other public programs to pay for making the richest people richer? Why are the Republicans pushing the same "trickle down economics" theory (a/k/a "voodoo economics") that has NEVER worked and simply explodes the debt? The GOP tax bills are the biggest steaming pile of economic bullshit to be crapped out of the Capitol in a generation. Here, let Velshi and Ruhle break it down for you (and these guys are frickin capitalists!):



O hai, ETA:



Thanks, Wonketariat!

[rubato]

The prior 16 years were characterized by such high corporate profits that they could not invest them, they used them to buy back stock and pump the stock price and finance mergers of questionable merit.

In an economy which has high demand and little cash to invest in production, like 1993, giving businesses more cash drives the economy. In an economy with lower demand and too much cash it does nothing beneficial and the harm to the country of cutting taxes is not mitigated.


yrs,
rubato

[rubato]

They have a cool guillotine in the museum in St. Pierre and Miquelon. The only one in N. America ever used for its intended purpose. I asked the Museum staff member if we could buy a goat and try it out. You know the French don't have a very good sense of humor when you come right down to it.


yrs,
rubato