sourceAustralian court convicts Muslim woman for failing to stand
SYDNEY (AP) — The wife of an Islamic State group recruiter gave the militants' single-finger salute outside a Sydney court on Friday after becoming the first person convicted under a new state law criminalizing the refusal to stand for a judge.
Moutia Elzahed, 50, defiantly remained seated with her arms folded in the Downing Centre Local Court dressed in a black niqab, gown and gloves after magistrate Carolyn Huntsman delivered the landmark decision.
She was found guilty of nine charges of disrespectful behavior during previous court hearings she was involved in. She will be sentenced on June 15.
New South Wales, Australia's most populous state, introduced the law in 2016 after several Muslim defendants refused to stand for judges on religious grounds.
The magistrate found Elzahed had repeatedly and intentionally flouted the established court convention in 2016 when she failed to rise for District Court Judge Audrey Balla. Elzahed said she only stood for Allah, but Huntsman found no evidence she had acted on a genuine religious belief.
"No evidence was presented that the teachings of Islam compel this conduct," the magistrate said.
In 2016, Elzahed had been trying to sue the state and federal governments on claims of police violence and wrongful imprisonment over a raid on her Sydney home two years earlier. She was ultimately unsuccessful.
Closed circuit TV showed Elzahed failed to rise in court nine times, with each offense carrying a maximum jail term of 14 days and a 1,100 Australian dollar ($828) fine.
Defense lawyers had initially cast doubt over whether Elzahed was the woman under the black robes who refused to stand. But they later said her identity would not be contested.
Elzahed is married to Sydney resident Hamdi Alqudsi, who was sentenced in 2016 to eight years in prison for helping young Australians reach Syria to fight for extremists.
Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
Re: Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
Shades of the Chicago 7/8 trial. Is this judge (purposely a small j) Hoffman reincarnated?
Re: Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
So she didn't even attempt to provide any genuine, legitimate religious basis to back up her assertion..."No evidence was presented that the teachings of Islam compel this conduct," the magistrate said.
Not exactly life imprisonment...each offense carrying a maximum jail term of 14 days and a 1,100 Australian dollar ($828) fine.
This is obviously a form of contempt of court; not really seeing the problem here...



Re: Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
Maybe she didn't, but it actually doesn't say that, and if that was the only basis for the judge's ruling, it is probably appealable. Not sure what the standard is in Australia, but in Canada and the United States, whether or not a religious belief is genuine is dependent only on whether it is sincerely held by the person at issue. Whether or not it conforms to the dogma of some organized religion system is irrelevant.Lord Jim wrote:So she didn't even attempt to provide any genuine, legitimate religious basis to back up her assertion..."No evidence was presented that the teachings of Islam compel this conduct," the magistrate said.
Now, she may not have demonstrated any genuinely held personal belief either, but whether she did or not is not apparent from this narrative.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell
Re: Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
May I say, even if your particular brand of superstition states you do not have to stand for a judge etc, it does not over ride the laws of the land, so fuck you.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
Under our 1st amendment, sometimes religious belief and practice does trump the law of the land - that’s the whole point.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan
Re: Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
Luckily we don't live under your system.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
Neither do you anymore.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.
Re: Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
I think what you meant was, ‘you’re not part of ‘we’ anymore’.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan
Re: Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
With Crackpot, we always know what he means so it doesn't matter how he says it...
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21504
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
The old "SODUT" defense, eh?Defense lawyers had initially cast doubt over whether Elzahed was the woman under the black robes who refused to stand. But they later said her identity would not be contested.
.
.
.
Some other dude's under there
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Australia Won't Stand For It Anymore
I was using the royal "we". Neither the UK nor Aus live under your "interesting" system....
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”