And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

[wesw]

so say the people involved.....

I don t know if ms ford is a pawn in a bigger game , or if she is not....

....but the Dems are making it appear so.

I don t know if doctor ford is a liar, or if she is not....

....but her attorneys make her appear to be.

all involved people seem to suggest other than what she says is true.

a mysterious letter, which Feinstein is holding tightly, more tightly than the alleged victims identity was held, cannot be seen.

mysterious therapy notes, which seem to disagree with the mysterious letter.....

katz a famous resister? and now andy mc cabes lawyer is joining ms ford s team?

it certainly seems like a hitjob.

many people, I realize, thinks that the end, destroying the trump presidency, justifies any means necessary.

I realize it, but I strongly disagree

[Scooter]

Whatever you say, Ivan.

[wesw]

senator Grassley seems to have the balls of an iowa steer, in this matter.

I don t think that she shows up in the senate committee hearing, and if she does not, her claims will likely be judged to be not upstanding.

[Bicycle Bill]

I don't follow Trump's tweets; the so-called 'fake news' people do it for me — and after a week in which he seemingly ignored her allegations and letting his spin doctors, hired mouthpieces, and the rest of his flock of sheep loyal supporters wage the counter-attack, Trump put Dr. Ford in his sights over the weekend ...

I have no doubt that, if the attack on Dr. Ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local Law Enforcement Authorities by either her or her loving parents. I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!

(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/sta ... 6473055235)

To which I would say to the PINO (President In Name Only) — and to his face, if it were at all possible — "We're still waiting to see your tax forms.  Show us yours before you start demanding other people to produce documents at your command."

-"BB"-

[ex-khobar Andy]

This comment to a NYT piece says it all, cogently:

John Graubard
NYC Sept. 22

In law there are four levels for the burden of proof. Three of these are well known: (a) beyond a reasonable doubt, for criminal cases; (b) clear and convincing, for certain civil cases; (c) a preponderance of the evidence (i.e., anything over 50/50), for ordinary civil cases.

But the fourth level, probable cause, only means that a reasonable person, knowing the facts, might believe that a person has done some act … it is less than 50%. A magistrate may issue an arrest warrant on a showing that there is a reasonable basis to find that a crime (sexual assault, for example) has been committed, and that there is a reasonable basis to believe that the person to be arrested committed it.

For the purpose of a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court (and, I suggest, for other positions of great power, such as President), the standard should be that of probable cause, not a higher standard, so that we can look and say of that person that she or he is beyond any reproach.

[liberty]

Greasy shit for Brains is a liar; it knows full well that an impeachment without a conviction in the senate means nothing. It is no more than a footnote in history. It might have a personal traumatic effect on a man of honor, but hell we are talking about liberal Bill Clinton, that Mother fucker probably thinks it is something to brag about.

[Scooter]

Was he impeached, yes or no? So remind me again how I am a "liar"?

In addition to being impeached, he also lost his law license, how to resign his license to the US Supreme Court bar, was found in contempt of court and fined and paid Paula Jones a $850,000 settlement.

I'd be happy if Kavanagh faced any one of those consequences.

So much for the "Clinton rule". Do you never tire of jamming your foot in your mouth? Because I will never tire throwing it in your face every time you do.

[Jarlaxle]

OK...do you or do you not understand the ACTUAL reason that Bill Clinton was disbarred?

[Lord Jim]

Do you never tire of jamming your foot in your mouth? Because I will never tire throwing it in your face every time you do.

But if his foot is jammed in his mouth, isn't it already in his face?

[Lord Jim]

Speaking of feet, here's a possible second shoe dropping:

The New Yorker
‏Verified account @NewYorker
2m2 minutes ago

A new allegation of sexual misconduct has been made against Brett Kavanaugh, dating back to his college years. "This is a serious, disturbing, and credible allegation, and should be fully investigated,” Senator Mazie Hirono said.

It's a very different sort of allegation; here's the full article:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-des ... ah-ramirez

[Scooter]

OK...do you or do you not understand the ACTUAL reason that Bill Clinton was disbarred?

I understand that the formal accusations against him had little to nothing to do with the actual reason for investigting him nor for impeaching him.

[Lord Jim]

Shoe #3?

BREAKING: Michael Avenatti Steps Forward With a Client Who Has 'Credible Information' on Kavanaugh Allegations

Locial media swarmed on Sunday night in anticipation of a second Kavanuagh accuser stepping forward. The Drudge Report had a headline reading "Another Woman?" which left many clinging to their phones and computers, awaiting the news.

Attorney Michael Avenatti, who represented Stormy Daniels, tweeted a vague statement roughly 30 minutes before coming forward with information about a new client of his.

Michael Avenatti
✔
@MichaelAvenatti

I represent a woman with credible information regarding Judge Kavanaugh and Mark Judge. We will be demanding the opportunity to present testimony to the committee and will likewise be demanding that Judge and others be subpoenaed to testify. The nomination must be withdrawn.
4:33 PM - Sep 23, 2018

Michael Avenatti
‏Verified account @MichaelAvenatti
29m29 minutes ago

My client is not Deborah Ramirez.
611 replies 2,236 retweets 6,491 likes

It's no surprise that Avenatti tweeted the information. 24 hours earlier Avenatti tweeted saying Ford was not alone in her accusations.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbauma ... s-n2521873

[Scooter]

I guess all three of them are "mixed up" about what happened.

[Jarlaxle]

OK...do you or do you not understand the ACTUAL reason that Bill Clinton was disbarred?

I understand that the formal accusations against him had little to nothing to do with the actual reason for investigting him nor for impeaching him.

Answer the question.

[RayThom]

... I understand that the formal accusations against him had little to nothing to do with the actual reason for investigting him nor for impeaching him.

Here's what Snopes.com has to say about that:
Bill Clinton was Fined, Disbarred Over the Monica Lewinsky Scandal
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill- ... y-scandal/

[Scooter]

Answer the question.

I gave the only answer you're gonna get. Not your remedial reading instructor. Try the Sylvan Method.

[wesw]

I know that scooter is brilliant and all, so I can t figure out why the intelligence level of the conversations drops so dramatically when he chimes in...



it s like a cold front of meanness and deceit sweeps across the board....

supershitstorm scooter....., the hysterical hurricane....

it s like a topical depression formed over lake ontario

hey!

now I get why no one left for Canada....

[Scooter]

I reflect back that which other posters put out, only with ten times the intensity. It sends the message that they should not start what they lack the wit and stomach to finish.

[liberty]

It should be obvious the Dens are just trying to delay. Anyone can make an allegation, but that doesn’t make it true. The solution is to go ahead confirm him let him serve and continue the investigation and impeach him later if necessary.

[Sue U]

The solution is to go ahead confirm him let him serve and continue the investigation and impeach him later if necessary.

Yeah, because that would be so much less of a clusterfuck than taking a few days now to actually determine and consider the evidence, and would do so much for preserving the integrity of the Court.