And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Lord Jim »

any input by avenatti will only discredit the accusers claims.
I don't know how things are on the alternative timeline Earth that you dwell on wes, but on this one, you can draw a direct line between the efforts of Michael Avenatti and the fact that Trump's longtime fixer, (a guy who once said he would "take a bullet" for Trump) is now singing for federal investigators...

That's the kind of impact he's had on this Earth...

ETA:

However personally self-interested his motives may be, the fact of the matter is that Michael Avenatti does not have a track record of getting involved with high profile clients who turn out to be full of shit...
ImageImageImage

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5754
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

The more I read about Kavanaugh's yearbook entry the more disgusted I am. And trust me, I'm no prude.

I really hope that Renate Schroeder Dolphin sues the living daylights out of Kavanaugh, the rest of his gang at Georgetown Prep and the school itself which was presumably (??) the publisher of this yearbook. There is no other connotation possible to the many references to the 'Renate Alumnius' club. And when you see what 'FFFFFFFFFourth of July' and 'Devil's Triangle' mean (God I've led an innocent life) . . .

I suspect that Michael Avenatti would take the case. And if there is a crowd funding effort to raise initial funds for such a lawsuit where do I sign up?

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21230
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Several of Brett Kavanaugh's Yale colleagues who endorsed his confirmation to the Supreme Court are now calling for an investigation into the sexual assault accusations he's facing. Kent Sinclair, Douglas Rutzen and Mark Osler, all signed an August 27 letter from Yale Law School alumni to the Senate Judiciary Committee defending Kavanaugh's character.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19704
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

David Brock: I knew Brett Kavanaugh during his years as a Republican operative. Don't let him sit on the Supreme Court.

We were part of a close circle of cynical hard-right operatives being groomed for much bigger things.

Sep.07.2018 / 1:25 PM EDT
Image: President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh
David Brock is the author of five political books, including "Killing the Messenger" (Hachette, 2015) and "Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative" (Crown, March 2002). He founded Media Matters for America in 2004 and then American Bridge 21st Century in 2011.


I used to know Brett Kavanaugh pretty well. And, when I think of Brett now, in the midst of his hearings for a lifetime appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, all I can think of is the old "Aesop's Fables" adage: "A man is known by the company he keeps."

And that's why I want to tell any senator who cares about our democracy: Vote no.

Twenty years ago, when I was a conservative movement stalwart, I got to know Brett Kavanaugh both professionally and personally.

Brett actually makes a cameo appearance in my memoir of my time in the GOP, "Blinded By The Right." I describe him at a party full of zealous young conservatives gathered to watch President Bill Clinton's 1998 State of the Union address — just weeks after the story of his affair with a White House intern had broken. When the TV camera panned to Hillary Clinton, I saw Brett — at the time a key lieutenant of Ken Starr, the independent counsel investigating various Clinton scandals — mouth the word "bitch."

But there's a lot more to know about Kavanaugh than just his Pavlovian response to Hillary's image. Brett and I were part of a close circle of cold, cynical and ambitious hard-right operatives being groomed by GOP elders for much bigger roles in politics, government and media. And it’s those controversial associations that should give members of the Senate and the American public serious pause.

Call it Kavanaugh's cabal: There was his colleague on the Starr investigation, Alex Azar, now the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Mark Paoletta is now chief counsel to Vice President Mike Pence; House anti-Clinton gumshoe Barbara Comstock is now a Republican member of Congress. Future Fox News personalities Laura Ingraham and Tucker Carlson were there with Ann Coulter, now a best-selling author, and internet provocateur Matt Drudge.

At one time or another, each of them partied at my Georgetown townhouse amid much booze and a thick air of cigar smoke.

In a rough division of labor, Kavanaugh played the role of lawyer — one of the sharp young minds recruited by the Federalist Society to infiltrate the federal judiciary with true believers. Through that network, Kavanaugh was mentored by D.C. Appeals Court Judge Laurence Silberman, known among his colleagues for planting leaks in the press for partisan advantage.

When, as I came to know, Kavanaugh took on the role of designated leaker to the press of sensitive information from Starr's operation, we all laughed that Larry had taught him well. (Of course, that sort of political opportunism by a prosecutor is at best unethical, if not illegal.)

Another compatriot was George Conway (now Kellyanne's husband), who led a secretive group of right-wing lawyers — we called them "the elves" — who worked behind the scenes directing the litigation team of Paula Jones, who had sued Clinton for sexual harassment. I knew then that information was flowing quietly from the Jones team via Conway to Starr's office — and also that Conway's go-to man was none other than Brett Kavanaugh.

That critical flow of inside information allowed Starr, in effect, to set a perjury trap for Clinton, laying the foundation for a crazed national political crisis and an unjust impeachment over a consensual affair.

But the cabal's godfather was Ted Olson, the then-future solicitor general for George W. Bush and now a sainted figure of the GOP establishment (and of some liberals for his role in legalizing same-sex marriage). Olson had a largely hidden role as a consigliere to the "Arkansas Project" — a multi-million dollar dirt-digging operation on the Clintons, funded by the eccentric right-wing billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife and run through The American Spectator magazine, where I worked at the time.

Both Ted and Brett had what one could only be called an unhealthy obsession with the Clintons — especially Hillary. While Ted was pushing through the Arkansas Project conspiracy theories claiming that Clinton White House lawyer and Hillary friend Vincent Foster was murdered (he committed suicide), Brett was costing taxpayers millions by pedaling the same garbage at Starr's office.

A detailed analysis of Kavanaugh's own notes from the Starr Investigation reveals he was cherry-picking random bits of information from the Starr investigation — as well as the multiple previous investigations — attempting vainly to legitimize wild right-wing conspiracies. For years he chased down each one of them without regard to the emotional cost to Foster’s family and friends, or even common decency.

Kavanaugh was not a dispassionate finder of fact but rather an engineer of a political smear campaign. And after decades of that, he expects people to believe he's changed his stripes.

Like millions of Americans this week, I tuned into Kavanaugh's hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee with great interest. In his opening statement and subsequent testimony, Kavanaugh presented himself as a "neutral and impartial arbiter" of the law. Judges, he said, were not players but akin to umpires — objectively calling balls and strikes. Again and again, he stressed his "independence" from partisan political influences.

But I don't need to see any documents to tell you who Kavanaugh is — because I've known him for years. And I'll leave it to all the lawyers to parse Kavanaugh's views on everything from privacy rights to gun rights. But I can promise you that any pretense of simply being a fair arbiter of the constitutionality of any policy regardless of politics is simply a pretense. He made up his mind nearly a generation ago — and, if he's confirmed, he'll have nearly two generations to impose it upon the rest of us.
(Edited to include ‘the rest of us’ which was cut off from the end of the quote.)
Last edited by BoSoxGal on Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 8986
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Sue U »

^
|
|
|
THIS.
My greatest objection to Brett Kavanaugh is not so much that he's been a lout, a jerk and a weasel in the past (although these are character traits that I would find disqualifying for a lifetime appointment), but that he is a hard-core partisan political operative masquerading as a judge. His career path -- including his judicial record -- demonstrates that he has a political agenda to implement through whatever position he happens to hold. He is a faithful servant of right-wing ideology, not of The Law and jurisprudence as we know it. Anyone claiming they don't want an "activist" Court that "legislates from the bench" should reject this guy out of hand.
GAH!

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17122
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Scooter »

The accusations being made by Avenati's client in a sworn declaration are explosive. Listening to excerpts being read live.
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose

"Colonialism is not 'winning' - it's an unsustainable model. Like your hairline." -- Candace Linklater

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by RayThom »

"... — and, if he's confirmed, he'll have nearly two generations to impose it upon
... the rest of us."
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19704
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

RayThom wrote:
"... — and, if he's confirmed, he'll have nearly two generations to impose it upon
... the rest of us."
Thanks, I fixed the quote - my apologies for missing it at first posting!
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19704
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

As a sexual assault survivor myself and a former trained sex crimes prosecutor who experienced loads of vicarious trauma doing that work, I was already triggered and deeply disturbed at the prospect of Dr. Ford’s testimony before the Judiciary Committee tomorrow.

These new allegations from the third accuser ring so true to me; I was at parties like the ones she describes in high school and early years of college, I’ve been harassed by boys behaving like she describes and have seen friends victimized the same way, and know at least one girlfriend in high school who lost her virginity to a chain rape like the kind she describes.

I’m sharing that here before any posts are shared declaring her allegations to be fantastical and impossible. If you were not this kind of guy in high school, kudos to you. If you were the kind of guy who would never engage in or even socialize with guys who engaged in this kind of behavior, kudos to you. But do not pretend that your experience is representative of all high school/college boys - this kind of behavior is all too common and it accounts for the high percentage of young women who have been victims of sexual assault.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19704
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

For wesw who commented in recent days that liberals shouldn’t be pro-college because young women get raped there; the stats on sexual harassment and assault (including rape) in high school are staggering, and considering the likelihood of underreporting (more likely among unempowered high school aged girls and boys), probably even more horrific than what is set forth here:

http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/show ... chool.html
By the numbers: Sexual violence in high school
Sexual violence at colleges is a well-known problem, but at high schools its widespread and little discussed

November 14, 2014 12:15PM ET by Claire Gordon @clairedon Google+
There was the notorious Steubenville rape case and then grim events of Maryville. And of course, there was Jada, a 16-year-old girl catapulted to the ugliest kind of Internet fame when parody pictures of her splayed-out, unconscious body became a Twitter meme.

But beyond the wrenching one-off scandal and social media storm, high schools remain in many ways a black box when it comes to the reality of sexual violence.

Unlike at college, there isn't an army of victim-activists coming forward to share their stories and slam their schools with federal complaints. Many high schools are squeamish about discussing sex at all, let alone the ways it can be violently twisted. And while bullying is a buzzy topic at middle and high schools, so much of it – vicious rumor spreading, groping a girl in the halls, calling a kid a homophobic slur – is actually sexual harassment, experts say. And it starts early.

In a given school year, 58 percent of 7th-12th graders experience sexual harassment


High school sexual assault
The American Association of University Women
Sexual harassment is pervasive at junior high and high school, according to a 2011 survey by the American Association of University Women. Girls were more likely to experience all forms of sexual harassment, except for being called gay pejoratively, which guys and girls endured equally. In the 2010-11 school year, 13 percent of girls reported that they'd been touched in an "unwelcome sexual way" and 4 percent reported that they'd been forced to do something sexual.

Students said girls who were really developed and pretty girls were the likeliest targets


High school sexual harassment
The American Association of University Women
That same survey asked students who was most at risk of sexual harassment. The results were, in order:

Girls who are really developed
Girls who are very pretty
Boys who aren't very masculine
Girls who aren't pretty
Girls and boys who are overweight
On the fact that both pretty and non-pretty girls were high-risk targets, the report somberly stated: "Sexual harassment appears to leave girls with few options." Good-looking guys were judged the least at risk.

"[Sexual harassment] is about power and control and they are in a position of power in the school," explained Holly Kearl, a co-author of the study. "Girls usually don't really harass men or boys. Everyone's just harassing the girls."

1 in 20 sexually harassed girls switches schools each year because of it


High school sexual harassment
The American Association of University Women
Conventional wisdom holds that a guy who sexually teases a girl probably just "like likes" her. But only 4 percent of confessed sexual harassers in the AAUW study said they were sexually teasing a girl because they wanted a date. Mostly, they said they didn't think it was a big deal or thought they were being funny. But a lot of students on the other end didn't shrug it off or get a chuckle. Twelve percent of students in the survey at some point stayed home from school and 19 percent had trouble sleeping because of sexual harassment. The negative impacts are significantly more pronounced for girls.

"The impact was really upsetting," Kearl said. "To think about all these students having these problems and the schools not willing to do anything about it."

Middle school bullies are 4.6 times more likely to sexually harass


A longitudinal study of 979 students released last month found that 6th grade boys who bullied other kids were almost five times likelier to engage in sexually harassing behaviors two years later. Using gay slurs had a particularly notable effect, making it one and a half times likelier that a boy would go on to sexually harass.

"The best way to demonstrate that you're not gay is to sexually harass someone," explained the study's author, Dorothy Espelage. "Because you're publicly saying, 'I'm a man.'"

1 in 5 high school girls say they’ve been sexually assaulted at school


In total, 53 percent of high school girls are sexual assaulted by a peer, according to a 2008 study of more than 1,000 students, and 39 percent of sexual assaults took place at school. That's specifically unwanted sexual contact, as opposed to the unwanted sexual comments and rumor spreading, which falls under the umbrella of sexual harassment. The majority of these sexual assaults were on the milder end of the spectrum – unwanted kissing, hugging or sexual touching – but a sizeable minority reported more severe violations.

1 in 8 high school girls says she's been raped


Twelve percent of the high school girls in that same study reported that they'd been raped by a peer. The 2013 Youth Risk Behavior Survey from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention came close to that result, with 10.5 percent of high school girls and 4.2 percent of high schools boys reporting that they'd been forced to have sex. A nationally representative government survey found that 42.2 percent of female rape victims were first raped before age 18.

18 percent of teens report being sexually abused in their relationships


In a new survey of 667 teenagers who'd been dating in the last year, funded by National Institute of Justice, nearly 20 percent of both boys and girls said they'd been victims of sexual abuse in their relationships. In contrast to earlier studies, this nationwide sample found that girls and boys experienced dating abuse at similar rates. The study didn't dig into the harm caused, and it's possible girls endured worse injuries from the abuse. Bruce Taylor, a principal research scientist with NORC at the University of Chicago and one of the study's lead researchers, told the Associated Press that the survey uncovered "the startlingly widespread nature of the problem."

12 percent of teens admit that they've sexually abused someone they're dating


In that same survey, conducted as a self-administered online questionnaire, one in eight teens said they had sexually abused someone they're dating. The rates of perpetrating dating abuse for boys and girls were again similar. But the researchers told the Associated Press that there was a difference by age, with girls more likely to seriously threaten or be physicaly violent towards their dating partners between the ages of 12 and 14, and boys more likely to become perpetrators as they got older.

60 percent of high schools boys find it acceptable to force sex on a girl in some circumstances [WTF?!?!?!]


In 1993, researchers presented 237 Louisiana high school students with 11 scenarios describing forced sex and asked if they considered any of them acceptable. Sixty percent of the boys responded affirmatively to at least one. Last year, when Sylvia Nemeth was a senior at Garfield High School in Seattle, she decided to probe that same question for an AP statistics assignment with her own set of scenarios. Of the 120 students she surveyed, 11 percent said it was ok for "Ryan" to force "Taylor" to have sex if they're in love.

"It was just really upsetting to read through them," said Nemeth, who's now at Smith College. "It made me really angry at the school system. How many people must not be coming forward, because they feel this culture of ignorance and rape apology?"

Only half of high school rape victims told anyone about it


In that same 1993 study of Louisiana high schoolers, 20 percent of students said they'd been forced into sex, and only half of them said they'd told anybody about it. A far smaller fraction ever reports it to authorities. A 1983 survey of 172 female sexual assault victims, ages 11 to 17, put that percentage at 6 percent – similar to the reporting rate among college rape victims.

U.S. public schools recorded 4,200 sexual assaults


That's in the 2009-10 school year, according to the annual school crime report from the Department of Justice and the Department of Education. Those 4,200 sexual assaults included 600 rapes or attempted rapes and 3,600 other types of sexual assault. The study also tallied how many of those incidents the schools reported to police. One hundred of the rapes or attempted rapes and 49 percent of the other sexual assaults weren't reported to law enforcement.

23 school districts face Title IX sexual violence investigations


High school Title IX
Under Title IX, all schools that receive federal funding have to handle sexual assault reports in specific ways, such as conducting a prompt investigation, protecting an alleged victim from retaliation and ensuring her safety. At the college level, there have been a slew of Title IX complaints from students who say their rights were violated, and the Department of Education is currently investigating 86 colleges. At the K-12 level, which hasn't received the same explosion of awareness, just 23 districts are facing federal inquiry for mishandling sexual violence reports.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19704
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

Brett Kavanaugh: Former Yale classmates speak out after ‘choir boy’ Fox News interview

Colombia judge says he remained a virgin for ‘many years’ after high school in interview broadcast days before vote on Supreme Court nomination

7 hours ago
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh said in a nationally televised interview that in his younger years, he was focused on sports, academics and “service projects.”

But it was his comments about drinking that rankled some Yale University classmates, prompting them to speak out for the first time.

Liz Swisher, who described herself as a friend of Mr Kavanaugh in college, said she was shocked that – in an interview focused largely on his high school years and allegations of sexual misconduct – he strongly denied drinking to the point of blacking out.

“Brett was a sloppy drunk, and I know because I drank with him. I watched him drink more than a lot of people. He'd end up slurring his words, stumbling,” said Ms Swisher, a Democrat and chief of the gynecologic oncology division at the University of Washington School of Medicine.

“There's no medical way I can say that he was blacked out. ... But it's not credible for him to say that he has had no memory lapses in the nights that he drank to excess.”

Lynne Brookes, who like Ms Swisher was a college roommate of one of the two women now accusing Mr Kavanaugh of misconduct, said the nominee's comments on Fox did not match the classmate she remembered.


“He's trying to paint himself as some kind of choir boy,” said Ms Brookes, a Republican and former pharmaceutical executive who recalled an encounter with a drunken Mr Kavanaugh at a fraternity event.

“You can't lie your way onto the Supreme Court, and with that statement out, he's gone too far. It's about the integrity of that institution.”

Mr Kavanaugh's credibility will be tested this week as the Senate Judiciary Committee is set to hear sworn testimony from him and Christine Blasey Ford, the woman who alleges that he sexually assaulted her when they were teenagers decades ago and he was, in her words, “stumbling drunk.”

In pictures: Chaos and fury at Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing

Show all 21

As Thursday's hearing approached, three Yale Law School classmates who had endorsed Mr Kavanaugh called for an investigation into her claims and those of another woman.

Yale Law professor Akhil Amar – who taught Mr Kavanaugh and testified on his behalf before the committee – called for a probe into what he described as “serious accusations.”

The committee will have to weigh Ms Ford's credibility against Mr Kavanaugh's – and, to a degree, consider whether Mr Kavanaugh drank to excess, as the pages of his high school yearbook suggest, or was the focused academic and athlete described by supporters and in his Fox interview.

In an extraordinary move, Mr Kavanaugh made his case on the conservative cable television network Monday night. The interview was remarkable for its personal nature.

At one point, Mr Kavanaugh volunteered that he had remained a virgin for “many years” after high school.

Mr Kavanaugh reiterated his unequivocal denials that he sexually assaulted Ford and that he exposed himself to Yale classmate Deborah Ramirez, as she contended in a story published Sunday in the New Yorker.

“I've always treated women with dignity and respect,” he told Fox.

Mr Kavanaugh described his younger self as a churchgoer who indulged in some beer-drinking – but never to the point of blacking out.

At one point, after he acknowledged that “people” do things in high school that later cause them to “regret or cringe,” Fox host Martha MacCallum asked: “Were there times when perhaps you drank so much – was there ever a time that you drank so much that you couldn't remember what happened the night before?”

“No, that never happened,” Mr Kavanaugh said.

Ms MacCallum asked again: “You never said to anyone, 'I don't remember anything about last night.' ”

“No, that did not happen,” Mr Kavanaugh said.

On Tuesday, White House spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said: “This is getting absurd. No one has claimed Judge Kavanaugh didn't drink in high school or college.”

She pointed to the Fox interview where Mr Kavanaugh said of youthful drinking: “That's not what we are talking about. We are talking about an allegation of sexual assault. I never sexually assaulted anyone.”

Alexandra Walsh, a lawyer for Mr Kavanaugh, declined to comment other than to point to the White House statement.

Some friends of Mr Kavanaugh from high school and college disputed the notion that his drinking was out of control.

“Drinking was prevalent in high school, but some guys handled it better than others, and Brett always maintained his composure,” said Tom Kane, a close friend who met Mr Kavanaugh when the two entered Georgetown Prep in 1979.

“He was not a stumbling drunk. He was never all that interested in getting wasted.”

World news in pictures

Show all 50

Chris Dudley, who played basketball for Yale and later went on to a career in the NBA, said he considers Mr Kavanaugh a great friend who is being unfairly maligned.

“I went out with him all the time. He never blacked out. Never even close to blacked out,” said Mr Dudley, a 2010 Republican candidate for governor of Oregon.

“There was drinking, and there was alcohol. Brett drank, and I drank. Did he get inebriated sometimes? Yes. Did I? Yes. Just like every other college kid in America.”

Ms Swisher, who lived with Ms Ramirez for three years in college, could not recall a specific instance in which Mr Kavanaugh acknowledged that he could not remember the events of the previous night.

But Ms Brookes, Ms Ramirez's roommate for a year, said she was present one night when Mr Kavanaugh participated in an event with his fraternity, Delta Kappa Epsilon.

Brookes said she believes there was “no way” he remembered all of the behaviour she observed that night, when fraternity brothers pushed pledges to get “ridiculously drunk” and do “ridiculous things.”

Ms Brookes said she remembers seeing Mr Kavanaugh outside the Sterling Memorial Library, wearing a superhero cape and an old leather football helmet and swaying, working to keep his balance.

He was ordered to hop on one foot, grab his crotch and approach her with a rhyme, Brookes said. He couldn't keep balanced, she said, but belted out the rhyme she's remembered to this day: “I'm a geek, I'm a geek, I'm a power tool. When I sing this song, I look like a fool.”

“It's a funny, drunk college story that you remember – at least, I remember,” Ms Brookes said. As she tracked his career over the years, and his rise in the federal court system, she said, “I thought it was so funny to think that's the Brett who sang that song.”

The Washington Post contacted Ms Brookes and Ms Swisher last week because they lived with Ms Ramirez at different points during their undergraduate years. Neither returned calls or emails until Tuesday.

Ms Ramirez previously told neither of them about her allegation – she accuses him of exposing himself to her while both were drunk at a party – but Ms Brookes and Ms Swisher said they believe her account.

Years before his Supreme Court nomination, Mr Kavanaugh acknowledged heavy drinking in a 2014 speech to the Yale Federalist Society.

He recalled organising a boozy trip for 30 of his Yale Law classmates to Boston for a baseball game and a night of barhopping, complete with “group chugs from a keg” and a return to campus by “falling out of the bus onto the steps of Yale Law School at about 4.45 a.m.”

According to his scripted remarks, he said: “Fortunately for all of us, we had a motto. What happens on the bus stays on the bus.”

Another former classmate who has publicly supported Ramirez, James Roche, said Mr Kavanaugh frequently drank to the point of incoherence.

“He hung out with the football players and soccer players, and they drank a lot and were bros,” Mr Roche, who briefly shared a room with Mr Kavanaugh during their freshman year, said in an interview this month. In a statement Tuesday, after the Fox interview, Roche described Mr Kavanaugh as a “notably heavy drinker” who “became aggressive and belligerent when he was very drunk.”

Meanwhile, three Yale classmates who along with others endorsed Mr Kavanaugh last month in a letter to the Judiciary Committee called Tuesday for an investigation into the sexual assault claims.

“The confirmation process should be conducted in a way that fosters trust in the process and the Supreme Court, and that seriously considers allegations of sexual violence,” Kent Sinclair, a political independent who practices law in Massachusetts, and Douglas Rutzen, a lawyer in Washington and registered Democrat, said in a joint statement.

Mark Osler, a former federal prosecutor and a professor at the University of St Thomas School of Law in Minnesota, said in an interview that “the focus can't just be on the accusers and trying to bring their veracity into question. The circumstances need to be probed.”

Mr Amar, the professor, wrote on Monday in the Yale Daily News that a probe would be the “best way forward.”

“If the investigation's facts and findings support him, then he will join the Court in the sunshine and not under a cloud,” he wrote.

Mr Kavanaugh hinted at his drinking in his 1983 Georgetown Prep yearbook entry. He identified himself as the “biggest contributor” to the Beach Week Ralph Club, an apparent reference to vomiting, and treasurer of the Keg City Club.

“100 Kegs or Bust,” his entry says, referring to a campaign by his friends to empty 100 kegs of beer during their senior year.

The entry also made several references to women, including identifying Mr Kavanaugh as a “Renate Alumnius.” The New York Times reported on Monday that the phrase, also contained in other boys' yearbook entries, was a reference to boasts of their alleged conquests involving a female student named Renate Schroeder from another high school.

“They were very disrespectful, at least verbally, with Renate,” Georgetown Prep graduate Sean Hagan told The New York Times. “I can't express how disgusted I am with them, then and now.”

Mr Walsh, Mr Kavanaugh's lawyer, told the New York Times that the nominee was friends with the woman, now Renate Dolphin, “admired her very much then, and he admires her to this day.” Mr Walsh said the yearbook entry referred to a kiss they had shared after a high school event.

Ms Dolphin did not respond to requests for comment. She told the Times she had never kissed Mr Kavanaugh.

“I learned about these yearbook pages only a few days ago,” Ms Dolphin told the Times.

“I don't know what 'Renate Alumnus' actually means. I can't begin to comprehend what goes through the minds of 17-year-old boys who write such things, but the insinuation is horrible, hurtful and simply untrue.

"I pray their daughters are never treated this way.”
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19704
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

Scooter wrote:The accusations being made by Avenati's client in a sworn declaration are explosive. Listening to excerpts being read live.
Here’s a link to her sworn affidavit:

https://sc.cnbcfm.com/applications/cnbc ... tement.pdf
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19704
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

Kudos to Senator Jeff Flake on displaying far more decency than the majority of his GOP brethren; I wish he had the courage to call for an FBI investigation and delaying the vote.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Lord Jim »

Scooter wrote:The accusations being made by Avenati's client in a sworn declaration are explosive. Listening to excerpts being read live.

It's pretty powerful (and revolting) stuff; now we need to see those corroborating witnesses also come forward.

Not to at all make light of the Ford or Ramirez allegations, but this is clearly the worst of them all. As I said earlier, if there are corroborating witnesses to Kavanaugh's participation in these crimes (as Avenatti has said there are) that also coming forward, (which would presumably happen in the next few hours) then I don't believe his nomination can survive...
Last edited by Lord Jim on Wed Sep 26, 2018 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage

Big RR
Posts: 14746
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Big RR »

I'd like to think that Jim, but it depends on just a few republicans and what they have the stomach to tolerate. Grassley will shamelessly plow ahead, so only the flip of 2 or 3 votes would derail the confirmation. We shall see.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Lord Jim »

Two GOP votes would do it, (assuming no Dems are still yes votes, which is probably a pretty good assumption; all of this controversy makes a "no" vote a lot easier for Red State Democrats, even those up for reelection.)

Before the latest accuser came forward publicly today, the number of GOP Senators who are not committed to vote for Kavanaugh had grown to eight (with a couple of more who don't seem very firmly committed)
Report: Eight Republican senators currently undecided on Kavanaugh

Forty-three Republicans have pledged their support to Kavanaugh. Eight GOPers remain undecided. They are Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine; Bob Corker, R-Tenn.; Mike Enzi, R-Wyo.; Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.; James Lankford, R-Okla.; Jerry Moran, R-Kan.; Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska; and Ben Sasse, R-Neb…

Know this: a nominee on the verge of sailing to confirmation doesn’t appear on national television with his wife to make his case.

Are there really 43 Republicans in the bank for Kavanaugh? Politico notes that when Marco Rubio, who isn’t among Pergram’s undecideds, was asked yesterday which way he’s leaning, he replied, “I want to see what happens in the hearing on Thursday. I can only vote based on the information before me.” Jon Kyl gave a variation of the same answer. Could be that they have every intention of supporting the nominee and are merely saying the politic thing under the circumstances. How would it look, after all, if they admitted, “Nothing Ford can say will sway me”?

But there may also be a growing risk of a dam break. The crack in the dam in this case runs as usual through centrist Republicans, particularly Susan Collins:
Senate Republican aides think that Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) will likely vote the same way as Collins, who thus far has played a more vocal role in the debate over Kavanaugh.

“We’re talking about a jury of one: Susan Collins,” said a senior GOP aide.

“When you look at Murkowski and even Flake, no one lets Collins get to the left of them, so she’s going to be the lodestar here,” the source added, referring Sen. Jeff Flake (Ariz.), who is seen as another GOP swing vote.
More:

https://hotair.com/archives/2018/09/25/ ... kavanaugh/
ImageImageImage

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by rubato »

I can hear Murkowski and Collins changing their votes. The only question is will there be others, Jeff Flake? Actually I'm betting the nomination is retracted or he opts out after some GOP senators have a quiet word with Trump or Kavenaugh.

This is just ugly.

yrs,
rubato

Big RR
Posts: 14746
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Big RR »

Somehow I think any words with Trump would be counterproductive, or useless at best. The same discussions with Kavanaugh could well result in his withdrawal, but it depends how much of a jerk he is.

Jim--from your link "It’s completely possible that Trump will fire Mueller next week"; even if he wanted to, Trump lacks that authority; at best he'd have to fire Rosenstein and appoint another DAG that would fire him, something that could not really happen within a week. And as big a jerk as Trump is, if the Kavanaugh nomination goes awry, I doubt he'd even dare fire Rosenstein, as it will further push the electorate in the direction of a democratic majority congress and senate. The man is an ass, but I'd bet not that big an ass.

ETA: Of course, I would love to see his head explode after he sees what happens if he tries to get rid of Mueller.
Last edited by Big RR on Wed Sep 26, 2018 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17122
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Scooter »

Cue wes to parrot whatever Fox News talking points come out to rationalize why Swetnick should not be believed and/or why her accusations don't matter if true, in 3... 2... 1...
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose

"Colonialism is not 'winning' - it's an unsustainable model. Like your hairline." -- Candace Linklater

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Lord Jim »

Scooter wrote:Cue wes to parrot whatever Fox News talking points come out to rationalize why Swetnick should not be believed and/or why her accusations don't matter if true, in 3... 2... 1...
He already did that; the game plan is to discredit this accusation by attacking Avenatti:
wesw wrote:that picture he released looks like kato kaelin.......


any input by avenatti will only discredit the accusers claims.

c mon man.....
The Orange One himself used the same tact earlier today:

Donald J. Trump
‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump
2h2 hours ago

Avenatti is a third rate lawyer who is good at making false accusations, like he did on me[Yeah, I know, you always make six figure hush money payments to false accusers because you're just such a generous guy] and like he is now doing on Judge Brett Kavanaugh. He is just looking for attention and doesn’t want people to look at his past record and relationships - a total low-life!
ImageImageImage

Post Reply