And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19705
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

Image
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19705
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

Image
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19705
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

Image
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19705
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

Image
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15115
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Joe Guy »

Just in case you missed it....


User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9745
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Bicycle Bill »

BoSoxGal wrote:Image
And by posting this cartoon, BSG merely confirms my earlier statement here...
... and when it comes to allegations of sexual improprieties against a male, ANY male, under any circumstances, it is all-too-obvious exactly whom you choose to believe.
... and also eliminates any doubts, as the misogynist that she shows herself to be, as to exactly how she views the male portion of the population.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19705
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

Bicycle Bill wrote:and also eliminates any doubts, as the misogynist that she shows herself to be, as to exactly how she views the male portion of the population.
Image
DICTIONARY
Enter a word, e.g. "pie"
mi·sog·y·nist
məˈsäjənəst/Submit
noun
1.
a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against women.
synonyms: woman-hater; More
adjective
1.
relating to or characteristic of a misogynist.
"a misogynist attitude"
Now, if you were talking about yourself . . .
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15115
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Joe Guy »

Misterogynist

User avatar
datsunaholic
Posts: 2557
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 12:53 am
Location: The Wet Coast

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by datsunaholic »

Seriously, BB, you really think that the majority of sexual assault allegations are false?

Unfuckingbelieveable.

I believe that the majority of sexual harassment incidents go unreported. The majority of sexual ASSAULTS go unreported. And while I will entertain the idea that some sexual assault allegations are false, I believe that the vast majority are true.

Over the last 2+ years, I have learned a lot of things.

One: Every single woman I know has been the victim of sexual harassment. Every. Single. One.
Two: Relating those incidents to ANYONE is extremely painful. Even decades later.
Three: Men are pigs.
Four: "Nice Guys" aren't.

It's about respect. Not everyone is OK with a game of grabass in the locker room. So while I suppose there MIGHT be a woman out there that likes getting catcalled by a potbellied 50 year old, the vast majority don't. And that goes for a hot 20 something guy too; just because a guy is fit, rich, and handsome doesn't give him a pass on making passes on coworkers. Or jumping a girl at a party.
Death is Nature's way of telling you to slow down.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Lord Jim »

Joe Guy wrote:Misterogynist
The exchange about this made me curious...

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the word for someone who is prejudiced against men is misandrist:
What is the female equivalent of a misogynist?

A misogynist is a person who hates women. A person who hates men can be described as a misandrist, and the corresponding noun is misandry. But however prevalent the attitudes described by these words may be, the words themselves aren't common. There are currently only 29 examples of misandrist in the Oxford English Corpus, while misogynist appears more than 1,500 times; 68 uses of misandry are overshadowed by over 2,000 examples of misogyny
.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/explo ... isogynist/

mis·an·drist
miˈsandrist/
noun
noun: misandrist; plural noun: misandrists

1.
a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against men.
"the counterpart to a misogynist is a misandrist"

adjective
adjective: misandrist

1.
relating to or characteristic of a misandrist.
"the university is teaching misandrist lies"
Last edited by Lord Jim on Mon Oct 01, 2018 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Bicycle Bill
Posts: 9745
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Bicycle Bill »

Thanks, LJ.  That's the word I was looking for.  I had originally typed in 'misandrogynist' but it didn't look right (and my spell-check didn't like it either, and still doesn't) so I started to replace it and never got back to finding the right word.

But my point still stands.  If BSG is OK with visualizing a man as nothing more than the appendage between his legs, as the cartoon she posted does, then she really has no ground to stand on and rant from if men reduce women to just the slit between theirs.  They're both wrong.
Image
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19705
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

That cartoon is not about ALL men; it’s about 10 men who decided not to believe a woman’s testimony about being sexually assaulted before she even opened her mouth. It’s about 10 men who hired a career sex crimes prosecutor to question alleged victim and alleged perpetrator, called her a ‘female assistant’, and shut her down the minute she started focusing in on a date on the alleged perpetrator’s magic exculpating calendar that actually served to corroborate the victim’s allegations. It’s about ten men who hid behind this female prosecutor so they would appear civil and respectful of the alleged victim, while going on camera in the hallways to undermine her, then going on rants in the second half of the hearing essentially calling her a tool of a left-wing conspiracy - thus revealing they had no respect for her and did not at all believe her.

YES, THOSE MEN ARE DICKHEADS!

No, all men aren’t dickheads. The cockles of my heart have been warmed in recent days to see the ones here and elsewhere who aren’t reveal themselves in their discussions on this issue.

Yes, I think you’re a dickhead. But I thought that long before you accused the majority of sexual assault survivors of being liars.

And for the record, I am very much a misanthrope. :mrgreen:
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Burning Petard
Posts: 4488
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Near Bear, Delaware

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Burning Petard »

It is also about a supreme court nominee who has given a wink and nudge message to his network connection at the Yale Law school to only send him female eye candy as candidates for law clerk. That connection at Yale is now catching flak from the Yale administration for revealing it.

snailgate

ex-khobar Andy
Posts: 5754
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by ex-khobar Andy »

The 'female assistant' who was there to provide cover for the 11 Republican men - Rachel Mitchell - has now said that there is not enough evidence to bring a criminal case against Kavanaugh. Rachel Mitchell is the Public Prosecutor from Maricopa County, Arizona. (In case that rings any bells, the sheriff of Maricopa County was, for a long time, Joe Arpaio. I don't know how many counties there are in the US - OK, Mr Google does - 3141 - so what are the chances that selecting a random sex crimes prosecutor will end up with this person? And, BTW, I have not seen this curious coincidence reported anywhere.) Now I am not casting any aspersions on her competence, and at one point she did say something along the lines that this five minute time quanta system was not the best way of getting to the truth - but she was never asked to assess this from a criminal perspective. Based on what I have seen so far, and I am firmly in Dr Ford's court - if I were on a jury looking at the evidence I think I would vote to acquit. I am not sure that I or anyone can be 95% certain.

However, I am 100% certain, based on his performance in the hearing room and his obvious lying about things which can be checked - Devil's Triangle a drinking game - really??? - that Kavanaugh is not suitable for the SCOTUS. He lied. Case closed.

Big RR
Posts: 14748
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by Big RR »

has now said that there is not enough evidence to bring a criminal case against Kavanaugh
This is strange; as andy said, I also didn't know that she was hired to opine on whether criminal charges could or could not be brought, and I am also surprised that a prosecutor would make this statement before an ongoing investigation was done.

FWIW, I don't think anyone has said there is sufficient evidence to bring criminal charges, but so what? this is not a criminal investigation, it's a review to determine if the candidate should sit on the highest court in the US.

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by RayThom »

I don't necessarily need to see Kavanaugh go to jail, I just want to see him go... anywhere but to the SCOTUS.

Of course, in a civil case all that's needed is a "preponderance of the evidence" to deem who is most believable. Unfortunately, I fear, this tribunal of old white men has already "prepondered" for someone created in their own image.

Keep in mind, the Lord Dampnut/Pence 'consortium' will probably get to choose two more justices before their reign is done.

Bigly sad.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19705
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

I think it was despicable of Rachel Mitchell to accept the role of inquisitor at Thursday’s hearings, and it was beyond despicable for her to write the letter opining on criminal charges which aren’t even in the realm of the conversation here - doing so only serves to cloud the issues and add to the hyper partisan screeching.

She’s an embarrassment to sex crimes prosecutors everywhere and I can attest that I am by no means alone in that opinion, including among plenty of conservative Republican sex crimes prosecutors.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19705
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

Breaking news! Kavanaugh attempted via text messages to shape the stories from former Yale classmates in regards to the Debbie Ramirez allegation, apparently prior to the New Yorker article, which he claimed under oath to know NOTHING ABOUT! He and his team were sending messages to his Yale classmates, trying to establish that he and Ms. Ramirez were friends and so her allegation couldn't be true.

This guy is not only a ducking liar, he's a ducking moron! :loon

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/suprem ... ce-n915566
Last edited by BoSoxGal on Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by rubato »

Rachel Mitchell - has now said that there is not enough evidence to bring a criminal case against Kavanaugh.
As BSG says it is not a trial. It is a job interview for a lifetime appointment.

yrs,
rubato

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19705
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: And Kennedy decides to fuck us all

Post by BoSoxGal »

A former Texas doctor who raped a heavily sedated patient won't serve prison time after he was found guilty of the crime Thursday.

Shafeeq Sheikh, a former Baylor College of Medicine physician, was sentenced to 10 years' probation Friday, and he must now register as a sex offender.

Jurors recommended the sentencing, which visiting Senior District Judge Terry L. Flenniken was required to follow by law, according to the Houston Chronicle.

In 2013, a woman, identified in local media as Laura, checked into Ben Taub Hospital in Houston. She was being treated for shortness of breath and wheezing; she was kept overnight and sedated.

Police said Dr. Shafeeq Sheikh went into her room several times through the night and sexually assaulted her.

In the hospital, Laura tried calling for help, but the nurse's button was unplugged.

Sheikh admitted to sexual contact but told jurors it was consensual, according to the Houston Chronicle. The woman was not assigned as Sheikh's patient, the Houston Chronicle reported.

A rape kit tied Sheikh to the crime and hospital cameras caught him on the same floor as the patient who was assaulted. Two years after the assault, he was charged.

Sheikh no longer works at the hospital. According to the Houston Chronicle, the Texas Medical Board revoked his license in 2015.

In an interview with KHOU-TV, Laura said she believes there are other victims.

"Of course, yes, and the reason I think so is because this person had everything very organized," she told the Houston TV station. "I'm not only Laura; I represent lots of women, women who've been raped and mistreated."
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Post Reply