Scooter wrote:Darren wrote:If you consider the Iranians' screw up as deliberate because they now admitted they shot the plane down that's your opinion. It still looks like an accident facilitated by incompetence and equipment that failed to discriminate between a target and a non-target.
Once again, it was you that raised the prospect that it was deliberate:
Darren wrote:I'm wondering if it wasn't deliberate.
If you recognize now that it was foolish to say so, you needn't attempt to deflect by trying to put words in my mouth.
Case closed. It was deliberate.
The Iranians now claim it was the act of one individual that had ten seconds to make a decision during a break down in communications. I doubt communications played a part unless the IFF gear was inoperative. That would qualify as communications.
Faulty IFF gear couldn't do a friend or foe query of the aircraft transponder. Operating a missile battery near an international airport with faulty equipment says a lot about competence. The other issue is the claim of a single operator. Russian equipment of that type more than likely requires a crew including one to operate the electronics.
The other issue is that the Iranians expect the world to believe the battery also had anti-missile capability along with anti-aircraft capability. That's too much of a stretch.
"TEHRAN: The Iranian missile operator who shot down a Ukrainian passenger jet was acting alone when he opened fire because of a communications breakdown, a Revolutionary Guards commander said on Saturday (Jan 11).
The operator had mistaken the Boeing 737 for a "cruise missile" and only had 10 seconds to decide whether to fire, said Brigadier General Amirali Hajizadeh, the Guards' aerospace commander."'
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/wo ... y_tOlqpgnc