Washington Redskin's New Name?
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
I agree. At some point in the future (who knows when?) anything "red"—or "brown" or "yellow" or "black" or "white"—or anything that might possibly be construed as ethnic or racial might become unacceptable. Best to stick with animals or mythical beasts or abstract nouns. Anyone who is alive now who thinks they can predict what will be considered "offensive" a generation from now is probably wrong.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
- Bicycle Bill
- Posts: 9820
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:10 pm
- Location: Living in a suburb of Berkeley on the Prairie along with my Yellow Rose of Texas
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
Geometric shapes and colors. The Pittsburgh Polygons, anyone?
But whatever your do, make sure those triangles aren't pink, and the stars are five-pointed (not six) and not inverted.

-"BB"-
But whatever your do, make sure those triangles aren't pink, and the stars are five-pointed (not six) and not inverted.
-"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
How about "The Fore Skins"?
Leading from the front...
Leading from the front...
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
I can’t predict tomorrow with any degree of accuracy. All I can do is look into the past and project into the future and there is no assurance that will work out. But, I do think it is stupid not to try to avoid trouble in the future. That is something that Americans are generally not good at; I once heard it said Americans are reactive people, not proactive people. Agree with that and someday that way of thinking will get us.Econoline wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 6:53 amI agree. At some point in the future (who knows when?) anything "red"—or "brown" or "yellow" or "black" or "white"—or anything that might possibly be construed as ethnic or racial might become unacceptable. Best to stick with animals or mythical beasts or abstract nouns. Anyone who is alive now who thinks they can predict what will be considered "offensive" a generation from now is probably wrong.
Soon, I’ll post my farewell message. The end is starting to get close. There are many misconceptions about me, and before I go, to live with my ancestors on the steppes, I want to set the record straight.
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
Nope. Might be construed as anti-Semitic.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
Econo wins the internet!

“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
Is Snyder taking the piss?The Washington NFL franchise, formerly known as the Washington Redskins, is officially going to change its name to the Washington Football Team.
The new team name is effective immediately, and it will remain in place "pending adoption of a new team name," the team announced in a statement on Thursday.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan
-
ex-khobar Andy
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
- Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
I came here to post exactly that. I wonder how much they spent on PR guys and image consultants and branding engineers to come up with that.
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
They should call it the Washington Team Football or WTF for short.
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
That is some what safe; it is hard to see how something derogator can be made out of that unless George Washington is the mascot. Washington was a slave owner; but, he gave us everything we have. We wouldn’t have a free world today if not for Washington; the left hates him because he was a slave owner. The left has no gratitude or understanding of history. I wouldn’t be surprised if before long they start calling for the destruction of the Washington Monument and the abolishment of the US Constitution.BoSoxGal wrote: ↑Thu Jul 23, 2020 7:18 pmIs Snyder taking the piss?The Washington NFL franchise, formerly known as the Washington Redskins, is officially going to change its name to the Washington Football Team.
The new team name is effective immediately, and it will remain in place "pending adoption of a new team name," the team announced in a statement on Thursday.
Soon, I’ll post my farewell message. The end is starting to get close. There are many misconceptions about me, and before I go, to live with my ancestors on the steppes, I want to set the record straight.
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21500
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
I think the NFL should sue them for appropriation of the word "football"
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
Meade - I would've expected you in particular to suggest that FIFA (rather than the NFL) should sue?
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
I think they're taking a big risk using "Washington".
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
Who is this left of which you speak? Recognizing people as complex individuals and deciding not to honor them because of some beliefs is notthe same as hatred.
And FWIW, I would think Jefferson and the subsequent Democrat republicans are responsible for a lot of what we have (the Bill of Rights, e.g.); not to minimize the contributions of Washington and the Federalists, but they clearly did not "give" us everything (indeed, we have gotten a lot of what we have over the years form a combination of administrations, Congresses, court action, and individual citizen action).
And FWIW, I would think Jefferson and the subsequent Democrat republicans are responsible for a lot of what we have (the Bill of Rights, e.g.); not to minimize the contributions of Washington and the Federalists, but they clearly did not "give" us everything (indeed, we have gotten a lot of what we have over the years form a combination of administrations, Congresses, court action, and individual citizen action).
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21500
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
I thought of it but decided that what the Washington Wahoos did last year was even less like American football
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
I don't think FIFA has any sort of monopoly on the term "football" which, I understand, predates soccer and originally referred to any sport which was played on foot (i.e. not on horseback) and can refer to any number of games. While you are right, it is difficilt to call the the game Washington plays as American (or NFL) football, but it is played on foot (or often on their backs or stomachs). 
-
ex-khobar Andy
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:16 am
- Location: Louisville KY as of July 2018
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
and ping pong...
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21500
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Washington Redskin's New Name?
Fetch my golf bats
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts