Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
Post Reply
User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21497
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Image

Rather looks as if she had her face too close when she used a paper fastener

Image

[Gosh I hope it's not a necessary medical device]
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
datsunaholic
Posts: 2700
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 12:53 am
Location: The Wet Coast

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by datsunaholic »

It's called a Chin Cuff. It's weird. It's also Angelina Jolie, so it's certainly not out of character.
Death is Nature's way of telling you to slow down.

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20155
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by BoSoxGal »

Facial adornment is a thing. I’m pretty sure it has been for thousands of years, even. Over in Africa it’s an even bigger thing - I’m a little surprised you’re surprised by it. Angelina is big on Africa, she adopted a kid from Ethiopia who grew up to launch her own jewelry collection.

Image

Image

Image
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21497
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Not surprised. Some people like ugly. I just wonder why?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20155
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by BoSoxGal »

MajGenl.Meade wrote:
Thu Mar 17, 2022 4:46 pm
Not surprised. Some people like ugly. I just wonder why?
Beauty is entirely in the eye of the beholder, as Mrs. Meade evinces. :nana


(Just to clarify, I’m referring to your ‘beauty,’ not Mrs. Meade’s.)
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by Big RR »

:lol:

And to add one additional thing--if you don't like it, don't look at it. It's easy enough to not click on images, and avert one''s eyes when seeing something in real life.

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21497
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

:lol: BSG

So is ugly, BigRR. Another straw man - where do you get them all?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by Big RR »

What straw man is that Meade, not clicking on or looking at something you do not care to see? I just don't get it; do you just have to respond, whether it makes sense or not? :nana

User avatar
TPFKA@W
Posts: 4833
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:50 am

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by TPFKA@W »

I can't even stand a hair on my face let alone some hunk of metal. The lengths women go to attract attention or simply do what they think is beautiful. At least it's not tattoos.

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21497
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Big RR wrote:
Fri Mar 18, 2022 2:46 pm
What straw man is that Meade, not clicking on or looking at something you do not care to see? I just don't get it; do you just have to respond, whether it makes sense or not? :nana
Yes. Where did I complain about having to look at anything? Or not clicking on something? All I asked is if anyone else supposed she thought it was a good look. Do you? Why invent a "how-liberal-am-I" response?

(And by the way, the lady's ironmongery image appeared when I opened AOL to check mail. They have a newsfeed that's not optional. Not much choice in what pops up and I wasn't scared or horrified either :nana )
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 20155
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by BoSoxGal »

It’s not my preference but I don’t think it’s a bad look. She looks striking and the visual is the medium. Everyone expects quirkiness from Jolie, she famously wore a vial of Billy Bob Thornton’s blood around her neck when they were married. So she’s into weird.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

MGMcAnick
Posts: 1358
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 10:01 pm
Location: 12 NM from ICT @ 010º

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by MGMcAnick »

BoSoxGal wrote:
Fri Mar 18, 2022 3:58 pm
she famously wore a vial of Billy Bob Thornton’s blood around her neck when they were married. So she’s into weird.
I'd agree, just because she was with Billy Bob. He's (just a bit) weird too.

That looks like an instant speech impediment to me.

One of my college friends, in fact the only one I still regularly associate with, has a son who is part of Billy Bob's band, The Boxmasters. They've been to Kansas a couple of times. That friend is the one who found my 1937 MGTA in the trees near a neighbor's farm house. A week, and some dollars, later it was in my garage.

From 2016: http://www.emporiagazette.com/area_news ... 91300.html
A friend of Doc's, one of only two B-29 bombers still flying.

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15467
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by Joe Guy »

Maybe she doesn't realize the thing is still on her face. She probably wears it at night to keep her chin from sagging.

Big RR
Posts: 14932
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by Big RR »

Do you? Why invent a "how-liberal-am-I" response?
So now defending someone's right to look the way they choose to is "liberal"? As opposed to wat?

And, FWIW, all said is that you don't have to look at anything you don't want to. How that is a strawman, or liberal for that matter, is beyond me. :shrug

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by Gob »

Image
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21497
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Do we suppose she thinks this a good look?

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Big RR wrote:
Fri Mar 18, 2022 8:15 pm
Do you? Why invent a "how-liberal-am-I" response?
So now defending someone's right to look the way they choose to is "liberal"? As opposed to wat?

And, FWIW, all said is that you don't have to look at anything you don't want to. How that is a strawman, or liberal for that matter, is beyond me. :shrug
I didn't attack anyone's "right" to look the way they choose. And you did not defend anyone's "right" to look the way they choose. You're just making things up now (again)

What you did was to pretend that I had made some complaint about having to look at something I didn't want to see. You made that up too so you could wag your liberal self-righteous finger at me over something I never said, wrote or did.

All I asked was did you (or anyone) believe she thought it was a good look. Do you?

(I know self-righteous when I see it - expert me :lol: )
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Post Reply