I'm betting he did not win himself his well-deserved Darwin Award and the vest did stop the slug, but he will have a very livid bruise on his chest for a while from underestimating the amount of energy in the impact of what appears to be a 9-mm round, even it was stopped and the force (somewhat) spread across his chest by the vest. -"BB"-
Yes, I suppose I could agree with you ... but then we'd both be wrong, wouldn't we?
Ugly little truth about all this body armor. YOU stop the bullet. The typical pistol bullet leaves the barrel with about a thousand foot/pounds of energy. That number is a generality, the actual will be more or less. Most any rifle will deliver a lot more. The body armor just spreads the force out over a larger area. That's why modern armor has steel or ceramic plates, to spread the force out more. You still get hit by the same amount of foot-pounds but over a wider area. The earlier generation that depended on the strength of the woven fiber worked, meaning the bullet usually did not penetrate the vest in a 'center of mass' hit, but the vest did deform and let some amount of the vest actually deform and 'dimple' giving a potentially serious injury (but still less than a bullet entering the body and wondering around among the organs, bones, and blood vessels. Some of the first vests were good protection from a hit with a usual 9mm pistol round, but no protection at all from a knife or icepick.