MAGA people at the Capitol January 20th 2025
after finding out the inauguration ceremony is taking place indoors
Bicycle Bill wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 4:16 amI....and we all know just how far Donnie will go in order to avoid the draft...
Every data-scraping internet app is a potential "national security threat" (for a given definition of "national security," YMMV). But the (presently most effective) solution is not to ban apps, it is to regulate how much and what kind of information can be collected, and to make that collection activity transparent. Tik Tok is no more (and no less) a threat than Facebook, Xitter, or Amazon.Burning Petard wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:11 pmAnd tik-tok is no national security danger--oh look, a squirrel!
snailgate
The Chinese are eating our lunch. Here's one example the US develops a superior battery and a Chinese American, Gary Yang, gives it to China. He was born in China but became an American citizen. Why did he give it to China; my suspicion is his loyalties are to China; he may even be a plant. Your stupid political correctness is going to kill us or make us slaves.Burning Petard wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:11 pmTrump blesses the short attention span of most Americans. A typical whipping boy for any problem, right behind the invading immigrants is China.
China is eating our lunch. (such a metaphorical contrast with 'clean your plate, remember the starving people in China). So he will place a terrible import tariff on any thing from China. Almost simultaneously he brags about all the stuff we are selling to China at fire sale prices. He brags as a great achievement that Somebody From China has shown up with big bags of money to buy up our cheap labor, cheap real estate, and cheap potable water.
And tik-tok is no national security danger--oh look, a squirrel!
snailgate
I notice your copy-and-paste stopped short of the following:liberty wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 3:40 amThe Chinese are eating our lunch. Here's one example the US develops a superior battery and a Chinese American, Gary Yang, gives it to China. He was born in China but became an American citizen. Why did he give it to China; my suspicion is his loyalties are to China; he may even be a plant. Your stupid political correctness is going to kill us or make us slaves.
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/03/11149642 ... a-vanadium
When a group of engineers and researchers gathered in a warehouse in Mukilteo, Wash., 10 years ago, they knew they were onto something big. They scrounged up tables and chairs, cleared out space in the parking lot for experiments and got to work.
They were building a battery — a vanadium redox flow battery — based on a design created by two dozen U.S. scientists at a government lab. The batteries were about the size of a refrigerator, held enough energy to power a house, and could be used for decades. The engineers pictured people plunking them down next to their air conditioners, attaching solar panels to them, and everyone living happily ever after off the grid.
He didn't 'GIVE' the battery or technology to China ... a Chinese company invested in it and got the rights to it after the American financiers turned him down.The agency issued the license, and Yang launched UniEnergy Technologies. He hired engineers and researchers. But he soon ran into trouble. He said he couldn't persuade any U.S. investors to come aboard.
"I talked to almost all major investment banks; none of them (wanted to) invest in batteries," Yang said in an interview, adding that the banks wanted a return on their investments faster than the batteries would turn a profit.
You intentionally bypass or overlooked the parts where several American companies tried to get licenses and got no response. This battery was not supposed to leave the country; it was supposed to be produced by an American company, that was the rule but this one individual, a Chinese man with family in China make the decision on his own and turned it over to a Chinese company. Turning it over to a Chinese company is the same as turning it over to the Chinese government. They're really not communist anymore; they're more like the system that Nazis Germany had. However as far as murderous is concerned there is no different, they're just as bad as the Nazis and now we can see that you're one of their supporters. It is stupid, no one who has family in China should get a US government security clearance or work in a highly sensitive position of any kind.Bicycle Bill wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 5:49 pmI notice your copy-and-paste stopped short of the following:liberty wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 3:40 amThe Chinese are eating our lunch. Here's one example the US develops a superior battery and a Chinese American, Gary Yang, gives it to China. He was born in China but became an American citizen. Why did he give it to China; my suspicion is his loyalties are to China; he may even be a plant. Your stupid political correctness is going to kill us or make us slaves.
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/03/11149642 ... a-vanadium
When a group of engineers and researchers gathered in a warehouse in Mukilteo, Wash., 10 years ago, they knew they were onto something big. They scrounged up tables and chairs, cleared out space in the parking lot for experiments and got to work.
They were building a battery — a vanadium redox flow battery — based on a design created by two dozen U.S. scientists at a government lab. The batteries were about the size of a refrigerator, held enough energy to power a house, and could be used for decades. The engineers pictured people plunking them down next to their air conditioners, attaching solar panels to them, and everyone living happily ever after off the grid.He didn't 'GIVE' the battery or technology to China ... a Chinese company invested in it and got the rights to it after the American financiers turned him down.The agency issued the license, and Yang launched UniEnergy Technologies. He hired engineers and researchers. But he soon ran into trouble. He said he couldn't persuade any U.S. investors to come aboard.
"I talked to almost all major investment banks; none of them (wanted to) invest in batteries," Yang said in an interview, adding that the banks wanted a return on their investments faster than the batteries would turn a profit.
-"BB"-