Here's the kicker. Captain Barnard is a woman "and therefore part of the designated group in terms of the Employment Equity Act" - women were seriously under-represented in the workplace and especially the police during the apartheid years and even up to today. But no matter - the police union stepped in right away on her behalf, right? Wrong!(Captain) Barnard, at the time of the dispute, was responsible for investigating priority and ordinary complaints against the SA Police service. In 2005 a superintendent level position was created by the police to improve service to the public in view of handling complaints. In that year Barnard and six other applicants applied for the position. An interview panel gave her 86.7 percent for the interview and recommended her unanimously.
"Captain Barnard was 17.5 percent better than the next applicant from the designated group. In view of this fact the interview panel recommended that should (Barnard) not get the position, it will adversely affect service delivery," Hermann said. However the SAPS divisional commissioner recommended that the position not be filled saying that her appointment would not promote representation.
Police union POPCRU will join the affirmative action appeal as a friend of the court between the South African Police Service and Solidarity on behalf of Renate Barnard. The case is scheduled to be heard tomorrow at 10:00 in the Labour Court in Johannesburg.
In POPCRU's court documents, they argue that white people cannot apply for positions if affirmative action targets have not been reached. They also argue that the National Commissioner may leave positions vacant for the purpose of affirmative action.
According to POPCRU, the police set targets to reflect the national demographics within the SAPS. The position for which Renate Barnard applied, was, according to them, only intended for candidates who would have promoted representivity. They further argued that candidates who achieved the highest score during the interview, or who were recommended for promotion, cannot have a legitimate expectation to be promoted.
"POPCRU's argument places an absolute ceiling for promotion above white employees in the SAPS. They believe in the idea of absolute representivity. The purpose of promotion is therefore not to improve the police service, but to promote affirmative action
http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicswe ... &pid=71654
SAPS long-standing oppoisition to improving police service takes a new turn but......TIA.
Meade


