Gosh, I do believe it was.




I would think that the one of the athiest "persuasion" would not have a symbol. Symbols seem to be created by believers to give a physical representation of the diety they believe in.What symbol of its own does the atheist faith use, then?
Now that's an image.Christians would be wandering around with little electric chairs hanging from their necks.
Not exactly, symbols are used by any organization or individual to identify themselves; that's why we have icons and avatars. Oops, you don't have an avatar...oldr_n_wsr wrote:I would think that the one of the athiest "persuasion" would not have a symbol. Symbols seem to be created by believers to give a physical representation of the diety they believe in.What symbol of its own does the atheist faith use, then?
Not true. The sign of the cross is purely a reference to the crucifixion. The invocation of the Trinity is done by making the sign of the cross with one thumb on the forehead, lips and then breast.loCAtek wrote:'Crossing oneself' or making the sign of the cross, was done not as a reference to the method of Jesus' execution, but to invoke the Trinity 'The father, son and holy ghost'. After two centuries, it was associated with the crucifixion.
Carl Jung positied his quadrinity theory...Scooter wrote:It would be rather difficult to demonstrate how something cross-shaped could be seen to represent a trinity. I could see a two (the vertical beam and the horizontal) or a four (each arm extending out from the intersection), but a three...?