Moobs banned

[The Hen]

Back on topic ... it is ludicrous that anyone would ban a topless photograph of a man becuase they thought it looked like a pre-pubescent girl.

[Gob]

If that looks "pre-pubescent" I'm French...

[loCAtek]

Back on topic ... it is ludicrous that anyone would ban a topless photograph of a man becuase they thought it looked like a pre-pubescent girl.

...but that's what happened.

Dossier's Andrej Pejic Cover Censored By Barnes & Noble, Borders

[loCAtek]

~heh, prepubescent female, judging from the face. As a male, he looks barely past puberty in that 'I have muscles, but i don't use them' stage.

He needs to take up a sport, or find a real job, to be a sexy man to me.

[Sean]

Actually according to the article it was censored for appearing like a topless woman.

You brought the idea of pre-pubescence in Lo...

[Gob]

I was wondering where an idea that stupid could have come from!

[The Hen]

Sorry.

I got distracted there.

Back on topic ... it is ludicrous that anyone would ban a topless photograph of a man because they thought it looked like a topless woman.

[loCAtek]

Yes, I said he looked like a prepubescent female;

Right. Glam was androgynous, but it wasn't entirely nude.

I think the biggest problem with Andrej Pejic's cover is not just that he looks female, but that his small breasts make him look like a prepubescent female, while the make-up adds to effect of making him a sexy prepubescent female. There's a lot of disapproval for turning underage girls into sex objects. Even if he is male, this pic is still saying prepubescent girls are sexy.

Well, there are magazines for topless, bottomless and pick your type of sensual to erotic depictions of women and men; those magazine can only be sold to those over 18. There are even magazines of women who look younger than eighteen, AKA 'barely legal' ...oh wait, Andrej is; so his material is inappropriate for that type of magazine.

I remember the uproar over Brooke Shields just being sexy in Jeans because she was underage.

[BoSoxGal]

Adam's apple, anyone?

[Sean]

Yes, I said he looked like a prepubescent female;

Right. Glam was androgynous, but it wasn't entirely nude.

I think the biggest problem with Andrej Pejic's cover is not just that he looks female, but that his small breasts make him look like a prepubescent female, while the make-up adds to effect of making him a sexy prepubescent female. There's a lot of disapproval for turning underage girls into sex objects. Even if he is male, this pic is still saying prepubescent girls are sexy.

Well, there are magazines for topless, bottomless and pick your type of sensual to erotic depictions of women and men; those magazine can only be sold to those over 18. There are even magazines of women who look younger than eighteen, AKA 'barely legal' ...oh wait, Andrej is; so his material is inappropriate for that type of magazine.

I remember the uproar over Brooke Shields just being sexy in Jeans because she was underage.

But that's all a product of whatever the fuck goes on inside your head. You shouldn't claim that the censorship happened for that reason.

[loCAtek]

Ha! That's the law here; I didn't write it, but I do agree with it. Sorry, you don't agree with protecting the underaged.

[The Hen]

The bottom line remains, anyone who wants this photograph banned is really quite immature.

It is a photograph of a man without a shirt on.

It is not a woman.

It is not a pre-pubescent girl.

My god we have ended up so far behind the 70's it is unbelievable.

[Sean]

Ha! That's the law here; I didn't write it, but I do agree with it.

The law says that he looks like a pre-pubescent girl?

Sorry, you don't agree with protecting the underaged.

That is beneath even you.
Fucktard...

[loCAtek]

The bottom line remains, anyone who wants this photograph banned is really quite immature.

It is a photograph of a man without a shirt on.

It is not a woman.

It is not a pre-pubescent girl.

My god we have ended up so far behind the 70's it is unbelievable.

No, it's not, but it depicts one through make-up and gender-bending. Same as Hentai Japanese comics depicts child porn. Both are harmful socially and should be contained by censor or banning. If you don't want the real thing harmed, then don't encourage the depiction of them being harmed or sexualized; it encourages the criminal.

[Sean]

No, it's not, but it depicts one through make-up and gender-bending.

No
It
Doesn't!

YOU are the only one to have read that into it. I'm beginning to worry about the way your mind works.

Let's play a little game shall we?

For your consideration...










Now, can you tell me which pic is not like the others?

[loCAtek]

Only one is wearing make-up; yet looks the most child-like.


..Shirley Temple Locks, seriously?

[Sean]

So if I've got this straight...

The androgynous male in the first pic looks more like a pre-pubescent girl than the pre-pubescent girl in the last pic?

Classic!

[Gob]

Sean, (Gob puts paternal arm around his young friend's shoulder,) let me explain to you. The object of posting for the Attention whore is not to rationally debate, far from it. In fact rational debate is the least important thing on its mind. The outrageous stupidity and lack of rational and intellectual posting is not accidental, it's deliberate, as it attracts more attention. Now you keep feeding the Attention Whore, and you're going to have to adopt it and keep it as a pet. And we both know that SMF will not be too pleased with that, don;'t we? (pats Sean manfully on the shoulder,) Now be a good boy, and try not to rise to the bait won't you. You only have yourself to blame if it tries to move in with you... (strolls off puffing at his pipe,) tch, kids today....

[Scooter]

The bottom line remains, anyone who wants this photograph banned is really quite immature.

Or perhaps is a gordita who is jealous because he makes a more attractive woman than she does.

[Sean]

Sean, (Gob puts paternal arm around his young friend's shoulder,) let me explain to you. The object of posting for the Attention whore is not to rationally debate, far from it. In fact rational debate is the least important thing on its mind. The outrageous stupidity and lack of rational and intellectual posting is not accidental, it's deliberate, as it attracts more attention. Now you keep feeding the Attention Whore, and you're going to have to adopt it and keep it as a pet. And we both know that SMF will not be too pleased with that, don;'t we? (pats Sean manfully on the shoulder,) Now be a good boy, and try not to rise to the bait won't you. You only have yourself to blame if it tries to move in with you... (strolls off puffing at his pipe,) tch, kids today....

Point taken mate but didn't you know I was a Twatbuster?