Moobs banned

Gob · Post by **Gob** » Sat May 28, 2011 1:00 am

Andrej Pejić (Serbian Cyrillic: Андреј Пејић) (born August 28, 1991. 19 years old) is an androgynous Australian model of mixed Serbian (mother) and Croatian (father) descent who grew up in Melbourne, Australia. He was born in Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. During the civil war, he and his family moved to Serbia, and then, when he was eight, to Melbourne, Australia as refugees. He has an older brother, Igor, who does not in any way have the same androgynous features.[4]

CareerIt has been reported that that he was scouted just before his 17th birthday whilst working at a local fast food outlet, but he has also stated he was scouted at a swimming pool whilst still in high school in Melbourne, Australia. He is notable for his extreme androgyny and his ability to successfully model both male and female clothing. In the Paris fashion shows of January 2011 he walked both the men's and women's shows for Jean-Paul Gaultier and the men's shows for Marc Jacobs. In May 2011, Andre's magazine cover for the New York-based magazine Dossier Journal - in which he is pictured taking off his shirt with his long blond locks in curlers - was ruled too risque by US bookstores Barnes & Noble and Borders, which covered the image with an opaque sleeve. Concerns were expressed that customers would mistake him for a topless woman.

As of April, 2011 he ranks no.11 on the models.com Top 50 Male Models list, and he was ranked no.98 in FHM magazine's 100 Sexiest Women in the World 2011

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrej_Pejic

loCAtek · Post by **loCAtek** » Sat May 28, 2011 1:01 am

His attempt is feminine, if so his body is a girl's not a woman's.

If he wanted to adopt a womanly figure that would be;

keld feldspar wrote:

Mantits...

Gob · Post by **Gob** » Sat May 28, 2011 1:03 am

Several hundred news reports

Gob · Post by **Gob** » Sat May 28, 2011 1:07 am

Separated at Birth?

The Hen · Post by **The Hen** » Sat May 28, 2011 1:08 am

I have never seen a girl look like him. Why? Because they don't.

loCAtek · Post by **loCAtek** » Sat May 28, 2011 1:11 am

You know, I was thinking about this today; he appears most 'womanly' when he's covered up in woman's clothes. It was a bad idea to expose his mantits and reveal that he just had an immature male chest.

To have achieved the illusion better, he should have stood back to the camera and looked over his shoulder. The question in the viewer's mind, would have been, 'Does he have boobs, or does he just look like he does? Like this;

Is that a man or woman?

Better to have keep that asset hidden, than to have shown it and removed all doubt.

The Hen · Post by **The Hen** » Sat May 28, 2011 2:54 am

I would say it's a woman.

But that has nothing to do with how stupid some people are in banning the image of Andrej from being on display because they ludicrously thought he was a woman, let alone those that thought he was a little girl.

As for keeping assets hidden? Well Andrej didn't hide anything and yet people (like you) are all Arthur and Martha about it.

Sean · Post by **Sean** » Sat May 28, 2011 3:12 am

loCAtek wrote:ROTFLMAO

I'm absolutely positively 100% certain and can provide witnesses, that my BF is a fully, physically, mature male. His pecs are awesome mighty boulders; his biceps are as big around as my thighs; his back is powerful, broad and %100 grade 'A' beef ~drool~

Methinks the lady doth protest too much...

...whereas you're hiding behind your buffoonery, by not providing a link. I know my BF is a physically mature man, but as you just said there are alternate definitions;

Was I referring to emotional maturity?

Financial maturity?

Spiritual maturity?

This thread is about physical maturity, thought you would know that.

No I didn't. I said that there were more body types than 'voluptous' and 'boyish' (which you seem to think are the only alternatives. Are you illiterate or a lying sack of shit?

So, I dare you: link to what you think I said; or I call shenanigans- likely I wasn't speaking of anything physical, and/or you're just making the whole claim up.

I dare you.

*Sigh*
Well since you are too feeble minded to look back one page or indeed to remember a post you made only three days ago... here it is!

So you now claim that you weren't speaking of anything physical when you used the word 'voluptuous'?
Oh my! Explain THAT one I fucking dare you!

Using your fucktardosity:
Donald Trump is financially voluptuous whereas mosts hobos are financially boyish.
The Pope is spiritually voluptuous whereas Richard Dawkins is spiritually boyish.
etc

Here comes that pickaxe I mentioned...

oldr_n_wsr · Post by **oldr_n_wsr** » Sat May 28, 2011 3:27 am

Really OnW, you don't find him 'womanly' or 'beautiful'?

Not in the least (well maybe his hair-do)

closest he comes is girlish and tarted up.

Only his hair.

The rest of him looks malnorished and/or sickly.

The Hen · Post by **The Hen** » Sat May 28, 2011 3:44 am

Out of Andrej and Jack, I find dear old Jack a bit harder to take on the eyes.

He really isn't trying to keep in much of a recognizable shape.

Gob · Post by **Gob** » Sat May 28, 2011 3:50 am

Jack?

The Hen · Post by **The Hen** » Sat May 28, 2011 3:56 am

loCAtek wrote:His attempt is feminine, if so his body is a girl's not a woman's.

If he wanted to adopt a womanly figure that would be;

keld feldspar wrote:

Mantits...

Jack.

Sean · Post by **Sean** » Sat May 28, 2011 3:57 am

Jack.

Sean · Post by **Sean** » Sat May 28, 2011 3:58 am

Snap!

The Hen · Post by **The Hen** » Sat May 28, 2011 3:59 am

Ha!

That is now SERIOUSLY and OFFICIALLY far too much Jack.

loCAtek · Post by **loCAtek** » Mon May 30, 2011 4:59 am

The Hen wrote:I would say it's a woman.

But that has nothing to do with how stupid some people are in banning the image of Andrej from being on display because they ludicrously thought he was a woman, let alone those that thought he was a little girl.

As for keeping assets hidden? Well Andrej didn't hide anything and yet people (like you) are all Arthur and Martha about it.

No one banned it but Gob.

I made no reference to my BF's physical maturity, but to this model's prepubescent appearance which was nothing like 'voluptuous';

Exhibit 'A' (thX Gob) no boobs nor muscles;

...thus lacking physical maturity till he's at least 25. Airbrushing muscle tone and feminism in doesn't count...

thus, we have prepubescence. If he wants to say it's feminine, then it's girlish prepubescence.

Scooter · Post by **Scooter** » Mon May 30, 2011 5:06 am

So according to you, all men without muscles and all women who are flat chested are prebuscent.

I guess by your definition, all concentration camp survivors looked "prepubscent" even if they were 70 years old.

loCAtek · Post by **loCAtek** » Mon May 30, 2011 5:14 am

I've not commented on the malnourished/starved, nor 'all' of anything, just this model, as per this thread.

Sean · Post by **Sean** » Mon May 30, 2011 5:38 am

You didn't need to Lo. You use sweeping generalisations which you apply to every male. This is why people are giving you examples such as your 'bf' and the malnourished.

Scooter · Post by **Scooter** » Mon May 30, 2011 5:44 am

loCAtek wrote:I've not commented on the malnourished/starved, nor 'all' of anything, just this model, as per this thread.

What's one more move of the goalposts when your assertions are completely shot down, eh?

Plan B Forum

Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned

Re: Moobs banned