Moobs banned

[BoSoxGal]

This entire argument is such an incredible waste of time. It is incontrovertible FACT that the model is NOT PREPUBESCENT. It is incontrovertible FACT that the model is MALE.

[The Hen]

I would say it's a woman.

But that has nothing to do with how stupid some people are in banning the image of Andrej from being on display because they ludicrously thought he was a woman,

No one banned it but Gob.

The magazine was sold in a cover so the image was effectively banned from the display. Ignoring half of what is written doesn't make you right.

[rubato]

nasty little shitheel fucks.


terminally weak and monstrously stupid.


small, mean, and stupid. None rises above self-congratulatory mediocrity.


What happened to Frenchy? You did.


yrs,
rubato

[The Hen]

nasty little shitheel fucks.


terminally weak and monstrously stupid.


small, mean, and stupid. None rises above self-congratulatory mediocrity.


What happened to Frenchy? You did.


yrs,
rubato

I take it your abuse is to me Rubato.

Would you care to explain yourself in relation to this thread?

[Timster]

Evidently he just cannot help his ASCII incontinence, Hen.

And I wouldn't hold me breath for a coherent response.

[Gob]

The other reason I love the "ignore" feature here...

[rubato]

Why the "hate Loca" crap?

Why the mobbing?

What's the fucking point?

Do you all absolutely have to have someone to hate? Can you not function without it?

Loca is who she is. I would say a little disorganised in her thinking but on the whole not malicious. Unlike a lot of you.

And what is the point of a long series of bitchy posts to Quad? Its not like he's an unknown quantity here. He will never change or learn from any of it and neither will any of you. Quad wants 'respect' as an expert on something. Anything. But he's a blowhard with nothing really worth saying. Pathetic, but not evil, unlike some.




yrs,
rubato

[rubato]

The other reason I love the "ignore" feature here...

Instead of being a perpetual jackass why didn't you put Loca on ignore?

Because you can't function without someone to hate.



yrs,
rubato

[Gob]

I have had Lo on ignore for some months now, moron, I have no replied to a damn thing she's said.

She is the other reason I love ignore, you were the first.

Edited to add; The fact that you think Lo's problem is that she is "a little disorganised in her thinking" just goes to show how poor your concepts of human nature are, unsurprising for someone with Aspbergers of course.

Lo has had a sustained and repetitive campaign of stupid posting here for a long time now, she does this as;
a)She's an attention whore.
b) She actually thinks this will drive people back to the CSB.
c) She's as dumb as you are.

Thanks for the heads up mate, best laugh I've had in months watching retard shoot holes in his foot again...

[oldr_n_wsr]

This entire argument is such an incredible waste of time. It is incontrovertible FACT that the model is NOT PREPUBESCENT. It is incontrovertible FACT that the model is MALE.

And IMO he looks like a heroin addict (like amny of hte runway models). I have more than a few heroin addicts in my outpatient therapy group and while I have not seen them with their shirts off, they look emmaciated (sp?) to put it kindly.

[The Hen]

Why the "hate Loca" crap?

Why the mobbing?

What's the fucking point?

Do you all absolutely have to have someone to hate? Can you not function without it?

Loca is who she is. I would say a little disorganised in her thinking but on the whole not malicious. Unlike a lot of you.

And what is the point of a long series of bitchy posts to Quad? Its not like he's an unknown quantity here. He will never change or learn from any of it and neither will any of you. Quad wants 'respect' as an expert on something. Anything. But he's a blowhard with nothing really worth saying. Pathetic, but not evil, unlike some.




yrs,
rubato

Unsubstantiated misrepresentations of what I have posted annoy me Rubato.

An example would be your complete misrepresentation in this thread for example. Lo is diong her best to attract attention and I will admit to give her what she craves. However, I will now go back to having her on ignore. It is nicer. I prefer it.

Shall I add you to that short list as well? Will you keep misrepresenting things? If you do, you will be added. Which is a shame as I have always liked you.

As for Quad? I give him no time at all, let alone any long posts. Though I am looking forward to him eventually coming back to the bitchy thread HE started post the link to which Board he purportedly shared a link from Plan B with.

Regards

Hen

[The Hen]

I also take it that you agree that the male model looks like a pre-pubescent girl Rubato?

[loCAtek]

You didn't need to Lo. You use sweeping generalisations which you apply to every male. This is why people are giving you examples such as your 'bf' and the malnourished.

Followed your link and can't find any reference to my BF, unless I was responding to your claim I brought him up here. So?

[loCAtek]

I've not commented on the malnourished/starved, nor 'all' of anything, just this model, as per this thread.

What's one more move of the goalposts when your assertions are completely shot down, eh?

I haven't asserted anything about the malnourished/starved nor 'all' of anything.

[loCAtek]

I would say it's a woman.

But that has nothing to do with how stupid some people are in banning the image of Andrej from being on display because they ludicrously thought he was a woman,

No one banned it but Gob.

The magazine was sold in a cover so the image was effectively banned from the display. Ignoring half of what is written doesn't make you right.

No, it was effectively censored, but available for sale. That is not a ban.

[loCAtek]

LOL Gob isn't ignoring me, the drive-by posting shows that.

There would be no response from him at all, if it was true ignorance. LOL

[Sean]

You didn't need to Lo. You use sweeping generalisations which you apply to every male. This is why people are giving you examples such as your 'bf' and the malnourished.

Followed your link and can't find any reference to my BF, unless I was responding to your claim I brought him up here. So?

I never claimed that. You are mistaken.

Your claim (and the one referenced in the quote) was that there are only two possibilities for body-type: Voluptuous and boyish. I enquired as to which of these body types your boyfriend is. It was in an effort to show you that there are in fact other body types. Comprende?

Another thing: To 'ban' something means to stop it from happening. If the image has been 'banned from being on display' then that is indeed a ban.

[Sean]

LOL Gob isn't ignoring me, the drive-by posting shows that.

There would be no response from him at all, if it was true ignorance. LOL

Have a look back... He only responds when others quote you. That is because he cannot see your original posts.

[loCAtek]

So? He responds, thus so. He could ignore it, but posts with references to me; which is not total ignorance.

[loCAtek]

I enquired as to which of these body types your boyfriend is.

Your inquiry was not a quote by me. You said it, I didn't. I just refuted it.