Moobs banned

[Sean]

Oh dear dog...
I think you are deliberately trying to muddy the waters here to get out of what you said.
I know that you are deliberately misunderstanding my posts as not even you are that dense...

[loCAtek]

OK, post the quote where I said my BF was physically not mature.

[Sean]

LMFAO - I will if you can quote where I claimed you had said that... muppet!

Here's a clue... I never claimed that you said that!

[loCAtek]

Cool, thX U 4 that admission.

[Sean]

Yes, I admit that you can't understand plain English...

[BoSoxGal]

How does this ignore feature work?

[Sean]

In your control panel BSG. Add to your 'Foes' list.

[loCAtek]

Still waiting for your link that proves this

By your definition your own boyfriend is "not even a mature man"... assuming of course that he is not voluptuous...

Where did I define him so?



...




...


thought so.

[Sean]

Thought? If you had the capacity to think we wouldn't be here!

I've already linked to your post. If you wish to carry on living in denial of this fact that is your prerogative.

[Scooter]

I've not commented on the malnourished/starved, nor 'all' of anything, just this model, as per this thread.

What's one more move of the goalposts when your assertions are completely shot down, eh?

I haven't asserted anything about the malnourished/starved nor 'all' of anything.

You said no boobs and no muscles = prepubescence. Therefore, according to your definition, 70 year old concentration camp survivors look "prepubescent".

Not my problem if you didn't mean what you said. Perhaps you might try saying what you mean.

[Lord Jim]

You said no boobs and no muscles = prepubescence. Therefore, according to your definition, 70 year old concentration camp survivors look "prepubescent".

FWIW, the physique of the guy in the OP looks to me anyway like it's a lot closer to the "concentration camp survivor" end of the spectrum, than the "pre-pubescence" end...

The first thing I thought of was "heroin addict".....

[loCAtek]

I haven't asserted anything about the malnourished/starved nor 'all' of anything.

You said no boobs and no muscles = prepubescence. Therefore, according to your definition, 70 year old concentration camp survivors look "prepubescent".

Not my problem if you didn't mean what you said. Perhaps you might try saying what you mean.

Very well, I said prepubescent 'not achieved puberty' that also includes healthy, nourished children. Some of those children are so well nourished as to be overweight, unlike concentration camp survivors who have achieved puberty, maturity and adversity. Starving muscles are not the same thing/image as immature, undeveloped muscles.



.

Not

[Sean]

LMAO - Comedy gold that!

[Scooter]

I said prepubescent 'not achieved puberty' that also includes healthy, nourished children. Some of those children are so well nourished as to be overweight

I see. So when you said Andrej Pejic looks prepubescent what you meant was that he looks like a fat girl. Thanks for clearing that up.

[The Hen]

Hmmmm. Interesting.

The US version of lads mag FHM has apologised for labelling androgynous Aussie model Andrej Pejic a "thing" after including him on their 100 Sexiest Women list.

The magazine posted an apology on its website saying the entry was an editorial error and that Pejic, who appeared at 98 on the list, had been contacted.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/entertainmen ... nder-model

[loCAtek]

LMAO - Actually it was you who clearly stated that (and I quote) "If he's not womanly - voluptuous; then he is boyish, which is not even a mature man." So by your own definition your BF either has a cracking pair of norks or is not a mature man. ..

Oh I get it; as they say in my country 'pronoun trouble'

In spite of the fact, that this whole thread has been about one individual and I used third person singular [he] to refer to the one person in the OP in the above quote ; it's being illogically inferred that I was speaking of ALL men [plural] up to and including my BF. Obviously, if I had meant All men, I would have used third person plural, such as follows; "If [they are] not womanly - voluptuous; then [they are] boyish, which [are] not even mature [men]."

I spoke of one person, Andrej Pejic, ‎whom we had agreed was the topic of the debate, with the proper English. All else is fallacy:

Description of Straw Man

The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position. This sort of "reasoning" has the following pattern:

Person A has position X.
Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X).
Person B attacks position Y.
Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.

This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because attacking a distorted version of a position simply does not constitute an attack on the position itself. One might as well expect an attack on a poor drawing of a person to hurt the person.

[Sean]

LMAO @ "Proper English"

Oh you're a one and no mistake!

[loCAtek]