I Object

All things related to the general running of the forum - got a suggestion? Here's where it should go.
User avatar
Rick
Posts: 3875
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:12 am
Location: Arkansas

Re: I Object

Post by Rick »

Would that be the premise of the OP.

See also the title...
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 8905
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: I Object

Post by Sue U »

Guinevere wrote:
Sue U wrote:As someone was fond of saying at CSB, there is an ignore function right between your ears ...
That was me.
I knew it was someone smart! :lol:
GAH!

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19387
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: I Object

Post by BoSoxGal »

Should a person have to endure ongoing abuse/harassment, day after day?

If it were the workplace, or school, or even the home - most lawyers would step up and say, "No!" There is a remedy.

Yet at CSB and here, the majority of legal beagles weigh in to say that the harassment/abuse should be endured, because ignoring it is no big deal, it's what a grown-up would do. There must be absolute freedom of speech to abuse/harass/tear down our fellow posters with impunity.

I do find that to be a somewhat peculiar position to take.

Gob, do what you think is best.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Rick
Posts: 3875
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:12 am
Location: Arkansas

Re: I Object

Post by Rick »

BSG do you think 2 weeks would change anything?
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: I Object

Post by loCAtek »

Ah-ha! Somebody admits, it's an attempt to change me. ...because quite frankly, what I see happening after this 'suspension', is a rule made being up, that I (or anyone else who pisses Gob off) will get three strikes and then will be banned. ...or he'll call it suspended for life, or some such to dodge the issue.

User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19387
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: I Object

Post by BoSoxGal »

It's not likely, no.
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Rick
Posts: 3875
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:12 am
Location: Arkansas

Re: I Object

Post by Rick »

Then why do it?
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: I Object

Post by Gob »

keld feldspar wrote:Then why do it?

What other means do we have of showing someone their behaviour is unacceptable and a detriment to the board?

The fact is while some have raised their objections to suspending Lo and Quaddy, no one has actually supported them and their actions.

So, apart from the “ignore” idea, what can/should be done?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: I Object

Post by Gob »

The fact is I have had rubato on ignore virtually from the outset of this board. Hence I have no problems with him. (In fact I peek at some of his posts in threads I have not invested in, and find his recent posts to be less offensive than before.)

But it is impossible to get away from Lo. She posts her irrelevant stupidity all over the board, and no one will be so foolish as to try to tell me she does not deliberately troll me and Hen and others, will they?


So if people do not support her and her behaviour, what sanctions will they accept?

A limit to her number of posts daily?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: I Object

Post by loCAtek »

Gob wrote:What other means do we have of showing someone their behaviour is unacceptable and a detriment to the board?
No one but the clique said that. In fact, Hen said, it was the hostile name-calling, like all the references to my alcoholism that correlated with low post counts.
Gob wrote:will they?
I will, it's not about you.

User avatar
Rick
Posts: 3875
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:12 am
Location: Arkansas

Re: I Object

Post by Rick »

OK then I'll go on record.

I don't have anything against them.

Now if I piss someone off do I run the risk of being "admonished" too?

From here on do I post through egg shells.

Once they're gone who's next?

Folks that haven't posted in awhile have weigh in does that mean nothing?

I know it's hard to believe I have a serious thought but right now I'm serious...
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: I Object

Post by Gob »

Keld, can you ever imagine yourself relentlessly trolling another member the way Lo has done here?

Do you not find her behaviour extreme?

Should we continue to accept her behaviour ad infinitum?

or, put the shoe on the other foot, would you put up with Lo's behaviour if it were directed at you?

Having just opened Lo's post to see what she has to say, I note no contrition, no acceptance of responsibility, nothing but a continuation of her shit stirring.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: I Object

Post by Gob »

Ps. I note you say you do not have anything against them, do you support their behaviour?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: I Object

Post by loCAtek »

Gob wrote:Keld, can you ever imagine yourself relentlessly trolling another member the way Lo has done here?

Do you not find her behaviour extreme?.
Ah, you mean like you did to ~Steve?

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 16990
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: I Object

Post by Scooter »

Steve accused Gob of having sex with his own daughter while Hen watched. Exactly who was trolling whom?
Image

User avatar
Rick
Posts: 3875
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:12 am
Location: Arkansas

Re: I Object

Post by Rick »

Gob wrote:Ps. I note you say you do not have anything against them, do you support their behaviour?
Hate to answer a question with a question, buuuut.

What's sending her away for 2 Days, 2 Weeks, 2 anything gonna do?

You say you'll stop socks.

What's that gonna do?

They're under yer skin and they know it.

How you handle it is certainly yer prerogative, the board is yers...
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: I Object

Post by loCAtek »

...and ~Steve apologized, but Gob didnt' stop.

Control Freak technique #9: Keep repeating the same question, or questions over and over, until the person gives you the answer you want, rather than what they really think.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: I Object

Post by Gob »

have a look at Lo's latest attempt to troll, above, keld.

She's well on her way to being excluded, she's damn well determined to make it happen.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 16990
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: I Object

Post by Scooter »

Steve never apologized for that. Steve apologized (begrudgingly, because Gar as much as threatened he would be banned if he did not) for saying that Gob's daughter had run off with David Ben Ariel.

Control freak technique #56: divert attention away from the truth by telling a lie which you hope no one will recognize as such (warning - only works if other posters have a shorter memory than you, otherwise you should try it lest you be caught in yet another lie)
Image

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: I Object

Post by loCAtek »

Gob wrote:have a look at Lo's latest attempt to troll, above, keld.

She's well on her way to being excluded, she's damn well determined to make it happen.
Well, it sounds like you've decided and are going to make an 'Administrative Decision'.

This has gotta be like a BBS syndrome of Admins.

Post Reply