The Foe Feature

[quaddriver]

How about those of us who don't particularly like Andrew (or anybody else for that matter)

Edited for accuracy

[Andrew D]

Go back to work on the cash machine. How is THAT working out?

Probably about as well as the newsletter -- all scintillating one issue of it.

Or the "internet marketing 'one stop shopping' site" -- if only it weren't "temporarily unavailable". Gee, how long is "temporarily"?

Or the explanation of how "you really can make money with quickly with zero cost" -- except that "The domain you are trying to reach has been disabled for violations of our TOS/AUP." Why on earth would that be?

[Sean]

How about those of us who don't particularly like Andrew (or anybody else for that matter)

Edited for accuracy

Don't you fucking DARE to attribute words I never typed in a quote from me you cunt!

[Andrew D]

Actually, Sean, you did type those words.

(Unless someone is successfully masquerading as you, which I doubt.)

You posted:

How about those of us who don't particularly like Andrew (or anybody else for that matter) re-defining our words to fit his own agenda?

What quaddriver did was quote you only partially, thereby changing the sense of what you posted.

Which, of course, he made no secret of; the change appears to have been the point.

It's rather like "money is the root of all evil." Those words do appear, in that order, in the Bible. But the Bible's statement is actually that "the love of money is the root of all evil." Rather different statements.

Nonetheless, quaddriver did not attribute to you words which you had never posted.

I can well understand your annoyance at having the meaning of your words changed. (Again, though, quaddriver made no secret of the fact that he was changing your meaning; he was making a point by doing so, and he did not attempt to hide that he was doing so.) But perhaps objecting on the basis of what he did rather than on the basis of what he did not do would get your point across better.

[Sean]

You're right Andrew.

I was extremely angry when I typed that last and it came out badly.

The fact remains, Quad is acting like a complete cunt in clipping my sentence to change the meaning. A poster doing it just to make a point would have left the whole sentence there and struck out the words to show that they had changed the meaning. He could also have used an ellipsis to show that there was more to the original quote. That's what a reasonable person would do. He however, is a fucktard who only does such things to troll and cause trouble on this board.

[Lord Jim]

Seems to me that if folks are driven to complete obsessive derangement by other folks who have them on "foe" feeling perfectly free to respond to their slimey behavior when it is quoted by others... (which I shall feel perfectly free to continue to do; despite any oafish efforts to bully me into silence.... as I said, I don't see the foe feature as a free pass or reward for the intellectually dishonest. )

That rather than whining incessantly to try and have some control freak system imposed to stop those who wont give them a free pass, and instead insist on pointing out what they are up to when appropriate... (while at the same time having the good judgement to avoid being pulled into another pointless pig wrestling contest with them)

A simple solution to their problem presents itself...

They can use the foe feature themselves on the person who's steadfastness in the face of their behavior they find so offensive....

That way, they will be spared having to see when that other person is commenting on their trashy antics...

(Comments, that of course couldn't be made at all, were it not for the fact that others have also encountered their underhanded techniques and made note of them)

Just put the other person on foe yourself....

Problem solved.

[Andrew D]

... complete obsessive derangement ....

I could hardly have put it better myself.

Mirror, mirror, on the wall ....

[Lord Jim]

Of course there's another solution, besides using the foe feature themselves....

They could simply stop engaging in the trashy antics and expressions of infantile narcissism that others are quoting....

If they did that, there would be nothing for the other person to comment on....

Of course that will happen about the same time I see a plaid leopard....

[quaddriver]

How about those of us who don't particularly like Andrew (or anybody else for that matter)

Edited for accuracy

Don't you fucking DARE to attribute words I never typed in a quote from me you cunt!

I assure you, you typed every single word I quoted. In the same sequence to boot.

[quaddriver]

...in clipping my sentence to change the meaning. .

and you and Gob and how many others have done the exact same to me?

the difference being, I explicitly wrote that I changed it. you guys do it and stomp up and down swearing that your version is the one I originally wrote.

I do enjoy pointing out double standards.

[Sean]

Alright you lying cock, if you want to make such an accusation against me prove it!

Go on, I fucking dare you!

[loCAtek]

deleted

[Andrew D]

They could simply stop engaging in the trashy antics and expressions of infantile narcissism that others are quoting....

But then there would be no Lord Jim at all.

And then where would we be?

[quaddriver]

Alright you lying cock, if you want to make such an accusation against me prove it!

Go on, I fucking dare you!

snicker.

pretty heady challenge considering it comes in a thread where you did the exact same to someone else....

[Sean]

So that's a no then?

[quaddriver]

So that's a no then?

repost posts you made and can read so you can waste 5 pages redefining meanings of words and rules of the english language for no other reason than 'to be a cock' (in your vernacular)?

no thanks

people can read. those not operating in cranial-rectum mode see it.

[loCAtek]

Slight correction Quad, that's American but Sean uses the English.

He would be a cunt.

[Sean]

So that's a no then?

repost posts you made and can read so you can waste 5 pages redefining meanings of words and rules of the english language for no other reason than 'to be a cock' (in your vernacular)?

no thanks

people can read. those not operating in cranial-rectum mode see it.

That's what I thought.

You have absolutely fucking NOTHING you shit stain because you know as well as I do that I don't operate like that. If I want to use only part of someone's post (and only ever for purposes of comedy) I either bold the words I want to stand out or strike out the ones I don't. Never have I deliberately twisted somebody's meaning by cropping/changing their words.

You are a lying cunt. The sooner you fuck off from this place the better.

What is it that you want here? You bring nothing but trolling, lies (both about yourself and others) and general shit-stirring.
I suspect that you want to destroy this board to gain approval from your cowardly little troll friends who lurk here.

Guess what numbnuts? You've got no fucking chance!

[loCAtek]

...as he replies as predicted.

[Scooter]

He would be a cunt.

And of course, we all know that there's nothing worse than a cunt

















except a drunken cunt.