No, you wouldn't. You would be...bigskygal wrote:![]()
I'd have to change my initials here!!
Hmmm . . . that's something to think about.
Big State Gal!
No, you wouldn't. You would be...bigskygal wrote:![]()
I'd have to change my initials here!!
Hmmm . . . that's something to think about.
no not at all, but there is something appealing about roots, or at least tentacles.bigskygal wrote:I first posted on CSB in 2005 - 6 years ago.
I did leave Yuma after 19 months, and Massachusetts (somewhat reluctantly) after a year working for an abusive manager - who was later forced to resign and was sued for sexual harassment.
I chose to come to Montana, a place I've dreamed of since my youth. I've been here over 4 years, except a few months spent nursing a dying friend in NM while laid off in '09. Absent this insanely lucrative opportunity, it wouldn't occur to me to leave here. In fact, I'm agonizing over the prospect.
For the record: I lived the first 9 years of my life in MA, until my parents made me move with them to AZ. I returned to New England at 18, and stayed - in Maine - to age 27, when I moved to DC for law school. Three years later I returned to Maine and stayed until age 35, when need of employment in my field forced a relocation.
I don't regret any of the places I've lived because I've met wonderful people to love & be loved by everywhere, and I've had many great experiences. But I'd have been perfectly content to live my whole life in southcoast MA, had I not been made to leave as a child.
I don't dispute a certain inner battle between a desire for rootedness and a desire to see new places & do new things. One reason the Houston job appeals is that I'd be debt-free quicker and able to pursue desire to work abroad.
Is wanting to experience as much as possible in my one life evidence of bad character, quad?
I'd never say anything so sexist!Sean wrote:LMAO - I saw the thread title and automatically thought that this was one of Gob's 'Minx or Minger' threads...