loCAtek's very own attention thread

[Sean]

AKA give the little shit enough rope...

This is where I will respond to the vindictive little twat's insults and bile. I would hope that others consider it too. That way we can stop her derailing threads with her gratuitous insults to all things British and Australian and to Strop and Hen in particular.

You wanted attention Lo but guess what? You should be very fucking careful about what you wish for...




Edited to change thread subject

[Gob]

Nice idea

[loCAtek]

LOL my good luck to you was Brit bile? LOL

Ethnic nuetral: Gung Hoy Fat Choy! Happy New Year Ahead!

[Sean]

Wow! Well done! You posted something to me which wasn't bait/lies/invective... which I thanked you for. I for one believe in common courtesy.

So what do you want? A fucking medal? If you disagree with the OP why don't you just sit back and see where this thread goes...

[loCAtek]

Very well, I'll continue to believe in common courtesy.

[BoSoxGal]

Can you edit the thread title in this forum once it's been started?

The stickler in me is bugged because it should be: loCAtek

Or, loCAtroll

[loCAtek]

Trolling means I initiated the hijacking, not that others attributed it to me; that's different,'eh?

[Sean]

Not when it's attributed correctly...

[Sean]

From another thread...

shwe[sic] asks you to look to the photographic evidence you've provided.

Dragged by her heels [backwards BTW, no wonder she lost a shoe];



Pushing an old man down the stairs, look right, an Abo at that;



Tell me this is anything other than cluster-forkism, 'eh?

First of all, I didn't provide any of the photographic evidence Numpty... get your facts straight.

Secondly, you are a baiting twat. Either that or you're stupid/drunk enough to believe the tosh that you posted.

[Lord Jim]

Seems to me that this type of thing has been tried before and hasn't had much impact on other threads...

[Sean]

Well Jim, even if I am the only one who does it the amount of crap in other threads will be slightly reduced.

[Crackpot]

Can you edit the thread title in this forum once it's been started?

The stickler in me is bugged because it should be: loCAtek

Or, loCAtroll

yes you can it's how my "It's a secret" thread became "it's not a secret any more"

[Sean]

Your wish is my command BSG!

[BoSoxGal]

thanks, mate!

[loCAtek]

Well Jim, even if I am the only one who does it the amount of crap in other threads will be slightly reduced.

That's a very good point, I hope this works for you, since the ignore feature hasn't.

[Scooter]

(Responding to this post)

How? When

printed as originally written by the author.

... was the point

By virtue of the fact that you were completely wrong by claiming that it stood for "shown in context", as well as having been shown a dictionary definition which states that it is used precisely when readers might believe what has been quoted to be an error. So yes, by using it, that was exactly what you were implying.

BTW Tell me what this has to do with Manning, 'eh?

It has to do with what you wrote. Are you now claiming what you wrote was off topic?

[loCAtek]

As stated, I was not completely wrong- the context was: as printed by the author. That may or may not be mispelled according to the reader but that's not the point.

Completely wrong, as in zero percent, is an overgeneralization; Sorry, you didn't want to acknowledge that.

I was responding to a question, brought about off topic that's true, but I did not begin the hijack,


You can politely sic, or be a Grammar Nazi; your choice.

[Scooter]

The context was, you believed something to be a spelling error and so appended a (sic) to it. When it was pointed out to you that it was not a spelling error, you invented a bullshit explanation to cover up your mistake, and when its bullshit was pointed out to you, you insisted that you were right all along.

But by all means, continue to make protestations about it, you only prove the point in doing so, that you are incapable of admitting when you have made a mistake.

[loCAtek]

No, I said I had been seeking the correct answer, and in the meantime had had to estimate. I had been close, but acknowledged by 'is that so?' that my guess was off.

What do you want a cookie? LOL

[Sean]

Following my own advice...

So lo, you wanted to sort things out with Hen in a face to face chat with a moderator (I think the word you're looking for might be mediator BTW)?

So tell me, did you have somebody lined up to mediate?