Dems Position on Wealth

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Liberty1
Posts: 680
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:55 pm
Location: Out Where The West Is

Re: Dems Position on Wealth

Post by Liberty1 »

You're supposed to be a lawyer, I would think you were more informed.

From the DOI
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
From the "main father's" first innagural address.
Such being the impressions under which I have, in obedience to the public summons, repaired to the present station, it would be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official act my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the universe, who presides in the councils of nations, and whose providential aids can supply every human defect, that His benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the United States a Government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes, and may enable every instrument employed in its administration to execute with success the functions allotted to his charge. In tendering this homage to the Great Author of every public and private good, I assure myself that it expresses your sentiments not less than my own, nor those of my fellow-citizens at large less than either. No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the Invisible Hand which conducts the affairs of men more than those of the United States. Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency; and in the important revolution just accomplished in the system of their united government the tranquil deliberations and voluntary consent of so many distinct communities from which the event has resulted can not be compared with the means by which most governments have been established without some return of pious gratitude, along with an humble anticipation of the future blessings which the past seem to presage. These reflections, arising out of the present crisis, have forced themselves too strongly on my mind to be suppressed. You will join with me, I trust, in thinking that there are none under the influence of which the proceedings of a new and free government can more auspiciously commence.


Having thus imparted to you my sentiments as they have been awakened by the occasion which brings us together, I shall take my present leave; but not without resorting once more to the benign Parent of the Human Race in humble supplication that, since He has been pleased to favor the American people with opportunities for deliberating in perfect tranquillity, and dispositions for deciding with unparalleled unanimity on a form of government for the security of their union and the advancement of their happiness, so His divine blessing may be equally conspicuous in the enlarged views, the temperate consultations, and the wise measures on which the success of this Government must depend.
I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way. Mark Twain

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17264
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Dems Position on Wealth

Post by Scooter »

Nothing in there is suggestive of belief in a Judeo-Christian deity or exclusively Judeo-Christian principles, or of any sort of theistic deity or belief system at all. The reference to a "benign Parent" is far more suggestive of deism (the belief in a creator who made the universe and then stepped aside and allowed it to unfold naturally without any divine intervention) rather than of Judeo-Christian theism.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Dems Position on Wealth

Post by Lord Jim »

Well, this:
that Almighty Being who rules over the universe, who presides in the councils of nations, and whose providential aids can supply every human defect,
Certainly suggests a very active and involved deity...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17264
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Dems Position on Wealth

Post by Scooter »

And still, not an exclusively Judeo-Christian deity by any stretch of the imagination.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

Grim Reaper
Posts: 944
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 1:21 pm

Re: Dems Position on Wealth

Post by Grim Reaper »

Liberty1 wrote:The left want to ellimnate risk, but life is not risk free, and in doing so they make everyone equaly miserable.
No, the left wants safety nets so people can learn from their mistakes without being driven into squalor. The right wants people punished for making mistakes.

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Dems Position on Wealth

Post by Sean »

I'm just shocked to learn that coveting is a gateway sin...
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Dems Position on Wealth

Post by Gob »

Start coveting your neighbours arse, and the next thing you know you're acting like Job.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

Post Reply