But being wrong would not make -- and has not made -- me dishonest.Andrew D wrote:... I was obviously wrong.
I was just wrong.
Honestly wrong.
Cliques?
Re: Cliques?
It is, of course, possible that I am wrong. It would be far from the first time:
I was just wrong.
Honestly wrong.
I was just wrong.
Honestly wrong.
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.
Re: Cliques?
Actually that was Gollum...I know that Jim was the one who posted the troll originally.
A perfectly normal Hobbit-like creature named Smeagal, who was driven into what he became because of his obsession....
Re: Cliques?
I've never heard of "free cash machine." Are you saying that is Jim's creation?Andrew D wrote: Okay.
It is honest, because I honestly believe that "free cash machine" is a scam.
No. Do you seriously believe that Jim is involved with this "free cash machine" you referenced, and his intention is to use it to swindle money from people?Andrew D wrote:Do you seriously believe that there is such a thing as a "free cash machine"?
Did you read Jim's explanation of what actually happened? Are you not misrepresenting what he wrote?Andrew D wrote:It is honest, because another of his schemes was taken down by the host:
"The domain you are trying to reach has been disabled for violations of our TOS/AUP."
Do you believe it is honest of you to represent Jim as someone who wants to swindle people? Do you believe that people are in danger of losing their bank accounts if they communicate with him?Andrew D wrote:Any further questions?
Re: Cliques?
I'll ask the question again, how and why is Andrew so obsessed knowledgeable with Jim's business matters .
How does Andrew "know" what all Jim's real life friends think of him?
How does Andrew "know" what all Jim's real life friends think of him?
Andrew D wrote:
That may well be part of the reason why everyone who knows him in real life detests him.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Cliques?
I have requested permission to post the relevant information:
He has flogged it under his own name. (Which I am not permitted to disclose.)
That permission has not been granted. I do not see that there is anything which I can do about that.Andrew D wrote:Am I allowed to post the relevant stuff -- which, not due in any way to me, includes his personal information -- or am I barred from doing so?
No.Joe Guy wrote:I have never heard of "free cash machine." Are you saying that is Jim's creation?
Yes. And if I were allowed to, I could prove it.Joe Guy wrote:Do you seriously believe that Jim is involved with this "free cash machine" ....
He has flogged it under his own name. (Which I am not permitted to disclose.)
I read his description of what he claims happened. I see no reason to believe it.Joe Guy wrote:Did you read Jim's explanation of what actually happened?
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.
Re: Cliques?
Um, because he makes them known to anyone and everyone who cares to pay even the slightest attention?Gob wrote:I'll ask the question again, how and why is Andrew so obsessed knowledgeable with Jim's business matters .
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.
Re: Cliques?
Really? I know nothing about them, and every time retard has challenged Jim to tell us about his work, Jim's declined to give details.
I think you are not telling the truth.
How do you know this; "That may well be part of the reason why everyone who knows him in real life detests him."
I think you are not telling the truth.
How do you know this; "That may well be part of the reason why everyone who knows him in real life detests him."
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Cliques?
Are you claiming that if you had permission to post "relevant information", it would prove that Jim wants to swindle people and everyone should avoid him if they value their bank accounts?Andrew D wrote:I have requested permission to post the relevant information:.....
That permission has not been granted. I do not see that there is anything which I can do about that.
Do you believe that Jim is involved with the "free cash machine" in order to swindle people?Andrew D wrote:Yes. And if I were allowed to, I could prove it.Joe Guy wrote:Do you seriously believe that Jim is involved with this "free cash machine" ....
He has flogged it under his own name. (Which I am not permitted to disclose.)
Are you accusing Jim of lying to cover up a swindling operation?Andrew D wrote:I read his description of what he claims happened. I see no reason to believe it.Joe Guy wrote:Did you read Jim's explanation of what actually happened?
Re: Cliques?
Are you giving me permission to tell the truth?Gob wrote:I think you are not telling the truth.
It's your board, not mine. You, not I, make the rules.
Are you giving me permission to post all relevant information?
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.
Re: Cliques?
Post what you want .... I'm past caring and you have chosen your path.
Re: Cliques?
If this scumbag is planning to post my phone number or address on this forum, (which he certainly shouldn't have to do to prove that I swindled anybody) I certainly object.
ETA:
He has already admitted repeatedly that he has no proof whatsoever that I ever swindled anyone out of one thin dime, so the only possible reason he could have for posting my personal information on this site is pure harassment.
ETA:
He has already admitted repeatedly that he has no proof whatsoever that I ever swindled anyone out of one thin dime, so the only possible reason he could have for posting my personal information on this site is pure harassment.
Last edited by Lord Jim on Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:06 am, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Cliques?
How and why do you know so much about Jim's business?Andrew D wrote:Are you giving me permission to tell the truth?Gob wrote:I think you are not telling the truth.
It's your board, not mine. You, not I, make the rules.
Are you giving me permission to post all relevant information?
How do you know "That may well be part of the reason why everyone who knows him in real life detests him."
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Cliques?
He knows next to nothing about my business. The only thing he "knows" is what I already explained thoroughly.How and why do you know so much about Jim's business?
The "why" he "knows" anything at all is because of his obsession with me.
Last edited by Lord Jim on Sat Feb 25, 2012 3:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Cliques?
Just to let everyone know:
Because of the recent direction of this discussion, I have now once again been compelled to take Andrew off of ignore to monitor his comments for any additional libelous statements to add to the record that I have compiled.
Because of the recent direction of this discussion, I have now once again been compelled to take Andrew off of ignore to monitor his comments for any additional libelous statements to add to the record that I have compiled.
Re: Cliques?
I have chosen the path which has led me to post:Daisy wrote:... you have chosen your path.
I have chosen the path which has led me to post:Andrew D wrote:He is, on the whole, correct.
I said so then:
I say so again now.Andrew D wrote:Lord Jim's observations on the "follow the Constitution" subject are, on the whole, correct.
He is, on the whole, correct.
I have chosen the path which has led me to post:Andrew D wrote:But dgs49 is honest about it.
What path have you chosen?Andrew D wrote:... I was obviously wrong.
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.
Re: Cliques?
I repeat (to Andrew)...
Are you claiming that if you had permission to post "relevant information", it would prove that Jim wants to swindle people and everyone should avoid him if they value their bank accounts?
Do you believe that Jim is involved with the "free cash machine" in order to swindle people?
Are you accusing Jim of lying to cover up a swindling operation?
Are you claiming that if you had permission to post "relevant information", it would prove that Jim wants to swindle people and everyone should avoid him if they value their bank accounts?
Do you believe that Jim is involved with the "free cash machine" in order to swindle people?
Are you accusing Jim of lying to cover up a swindling operation?
Re: Cliques?
and how do you know; "That may well be part of the reason why everyone who knows him in real life detests him."
Your obsession with Jim is taking you down very rocky roads Andrew, what will it take to make you realise that you are doing yourself no favours?
Your obsession with Jim is taking you down very rocky roads Andrew, what will it take to make you realise that you are doing yourself no favours?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Cliques?
I cannot answer questions whose answers require the posting of relevant information when I am denied permission to post the relevant information.
It is just impossible.
Imagine if you were told that the only way by which you could defend yourself would be to present the very evidence which you are not allowed to present.
It is just impossible.
If you want to blame anyone, blame those who make it impossible.
It is just impossible.
Imagine if you were told that the only way by which you could defend yourself would be to present the very evidence which you are not allowed to present.
It is just impossible.
If you want to blame anyone, blame those who make it impossible.
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.
Re: Cliques?
using this as a cowardly cop out just goes to show how low you have sunk.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Cliques?
Why is this worth so much to you?
Why are you so obssessed with Jim.
I'm on the verge of writing a paper on "Steve Syndrome."
Why are you so obssessed with Jim.
I'm on the verge of writing a paper on "Steve Syndrome."
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”