loCAtek's very own attention thread

[The Hen]

There is nothing to mediate.

One poster makes up unfounded lies about the other with no possible way to back up claims INCLUDING the combined memories of posters on this Board.

What is to mediate?

Nothimg.

Will the liar's actions change?

I doubt it.

However, for the purpose of the health of the Board, I will go into mediation with Lo once the parameters have been settled and we are both aware of what the other seeks from such mediation.

Somehow, I am sure she will ignore anyone else's desired outcome. That would be par.

[Sean]

That's precisely it Hen. I'm not sure that she understands the role of a mediator and would never accept somebody who (for whatever reason) was completely impartial.

[Lord Jim]

somebody lined up to mediate

Somehow I doubt there's going to be a flood of applications for that job....

[loCAtek]

That's precisely it Hen. I'm not sure that she understands the role of a mediator and would never accept somebody who (for whatever reason) was completely impartial.

I'm open to suggestions and have made a few, too.

[Scooter]

And if whoever that person is determines that you have been nothing but a vicious cunt, will you go fuck yourself somewhere and never come back?

Because if I were Hen, I would see absolutely no point in this unless it caused you to change your behaviour or leave. And since we all know the former is completely beyond your control... Why should she agree to anything if the next day (hour/minute/second) you will be right back in her face with your despicable lies?

[Sean]

That's precisely it Hen. I'm not sure that she understands the role of a mediator and would never accept somebody who (for whatever reason) was completely impartial.

I'm open to suggestions and have made a few, too.

Who do you suggest?

[loCAtek]

I've suggested Reality Bytes and Genr'l Meade, since (I assume) we both know and trust them. I'm open to any other such impartial, fair-minded meditators.

The intent is not to find blame or judgement, but to achieve real communication in private.

[Scooter]

So you aren't willing to accept any responsibility for your behaviou? Why am I not surprised?

[loCAtek]

Because you're not listening to anything but your own context.

[Scooter]

So you are willing to accept responsibility for all of the despicable, vicious, cuntish lies you have told? Excuse me if I don't hold my breath waiting.

[loCAtek]

Still not listening.

[Scooter]

Still a despicable vicious cunt who can't take responsibility for the lies she has told.

[loCAtek]

You're a hoot, Scoot!

[Scooter]

Still no link yet, eh?

[The Hen]

I've suggested Reality Bytes and Genr'l Meade, since (I assume) we both know and trust them. I'm open to any other such impartial, fair-minded meditators.

The intent is not to find blame or judgement, but to achieve real communication in private.

They are fine by me Lo, IF either accepts. However there is NO way I am ever communicating with you in private.

You have been posting some vile untruths about me and if you wanted to be private, you should have been private from the start.

This will be a public mediation, for the good of the Board. You have already made this a public Board matter.

So, next issue to resolve:

What do you hope to achieve from this mediation? What are your desired outcomes?

[Lord Jim]

What is there to mediate?

Whether or not it's acceptable to accuse someone of claiming they lost their virginity at nine years old without any proof?

Are there really two sides to that question?

[Sean]

Does anyone else remember the time on the CSB when lo admitted to being a bitter, lying, petty, vindictive little twat who was simply jealous of Gob and Hen's life?

I'd link to it of course but I'm afraid that the site is down...

[Lord Jim]

By my count, we now have four threads devoted to this "discussion"....

LoCa, what do you make of the fact that no one here...no one....other than yourself can recall what would have been very sensational and certainly remembered revelations?

I remember on the CSB, editec made the charge that Strop had posted that he had never mentioned anything about his sex life....

He couldn't produce a link for this. I started a poll asking if anyone could remember Strop having posted this. As I recall, the vote was something like 23 zip....not one person could recall Strop having made that claim....

I then asked editec if he thought that there had been an outbreak of mass amnesia...

Rather than admit that he could possibly have misremembered what had been said, he replied that could be the explanation....

Is that really where you want to be? Rather than admit that you could have been mistaken, you want to have the "it must be mass amnesia" explanation?

ETA:

Come to think of it, several years ago when editec was throwing everything but kitchen sink, real and imagined, at Strop and Hen about posts regarding their sex life, if Hen had actually posted what you're claiming she did, he would most certainly have brought it up, and he never did....He'd have brought it up repeatedly....

[Reality Bytes]

I'm afraid I must decline - I have taken great pains to avoid commenting on any of the contentious stuff here recently except where I have been directly brought up - and there is a bloody good reason for me staying out of this (actually several good reasons) not the least of which is my mums cancer and my OWN cancer scare including the fact that I had a nipple biopsy on Friday which you'll note I have not even mentioned here until this very moment.

I am by no means a impartial party I certainly have an opinion on whats gone on but have chosen to keep that opinion to myself and right now I have neither the time, the energy or the patience to moderate anything of this nature.

So I'll pass.

[Lord Jim]

Gee RB, I'm amazed you wouldn't want to take that on...

Well, no worries, I'm sure Meade will want to jump right in...