Ban her

All things related to the general running of the forum - got a suggestion? Here's where it should go.
User avatar
BoSoxGal
Posts: 19663
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:36 pm
Location: The Heart of Red Sox Nation

Re: Ban her

Post by BoSoxGal »

Hen, no worries - I'd feel tetchy too, as I have when AGD has hurled unsubstantiated vitriol at me. It is very difficult to ignore.

Sean, to be fair, in my post voting for banning, I specifically pointed out that it's not working to ignore, because of the vitriol she posts and the difficulty for many to successfully ignore.

In my response to Gob, I was feeling tetchy, due to the accusation that I was feeding the troll - as I have successfully ignored her 95% of the time.

I maintain my position, but as I promised Gob, I'll refrain from further comment - I just wanted to reply to you two to clarify my comments and smooth any ruffled feathers. (This kind of discord in the ranks of otherwise friendly community is exactly the worst, largely inevitable result of a troll.)
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Ban her

Post by Gob »

Thanks BSG, that's all good.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Joe Guy
Posts: 15082
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 2:40 pm
Location: Redweird City, California

Re: Ban her

Post by Joe Guy »

I wouldn't blame Gob for banning LoCAtek and it certainly wouldn't change my opinion of him if he did.

I just wouldn't base it on the pornography accusation. As tasteless and foolish as it was, I don't see how what LoCAtek wrote can be interpreted that way.

Andrew D
Posts: 3150
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:01 pm
Location: North California

Re: Ban her

Post by Andrew D »

bigskygal wrote:Hen, no worries - I'd feel tetchy too, as I have when AGD has hurled unsubstantiated vitriol at me I gratuitously defamed the entire defense bar.
Joe Guy wrote:I just wouldn't base it on the pornography accusation. As tasteless and foolish as it was, I don't see how what LoCAtek wrote can be interpreted that way.
Nor do I.

A newspaper prints an account of the trial and conviction of a pedophile. Is that child pornography?
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.

User avatar
The Hen
Posts: 5941
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:56 am

Re: Ban her

Post by The Hen »

From what I understand, the post I am meant to have made was along the lines of how happy I was to have lost my virginity at the age of nine because I had suffered from a phobia about dying a virgin for a number of years.

Now why NO-ONE commented on that at the time just totally escapes me.
Bah!

Image

Andrew D
Posts: 3150
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:01 pm
Location: North California

Re: Ban her

Post by Andrew D »

The Hen wrote:From what I understand, the post I am meant to have made was along the lines of how happy I was to have lost my virginity at the age of nine because I had suffered from a phobia about dying a virgin for a number of years.

Now why NO-ONE commented on that at the time just totally escapes me.
loCAtek: What are you saying?

Are you saying that Hen posted what she has just described as "the post [she is] meant to have made"?

If so, please provide that posting ipsissimis verbis.

If not, please state what you are claiming.
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.

Andrew D
Posts: 3150
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:01 pm
Location: North California

Re: Ban her

Post by Andrew D »

The Hen wrote:From what I understand, the post I am meant to have made was along the lines of how happy I was to have lost my virginity at the age of nine because I had suffered from a phobia about dying a virgin for a number of years.

Now why NO-ONE commented on that at the time just totally escapes me.
That assertion -- not yours, Hen; the one you are "meant to have made" -- strikes me as bizarre.

A child "loses" her virginity at the age of nine, and she "had suffered from a phobia about dying a virgin for a number of years". So, what, a five- or four- or three-year-old child fears dying a virgin?

Huh?

You may wish to explain yourself, loCAtek. Is Hen's description of your assertion accurate?

If so, what are you on about?

If not, what was your actual assertion?
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Ban her

Post by Sean »

Here you go Andrew, you can read all about it. :ok
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17119
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Ban her

Post by Scooter »

Andrew D wrote:If so, please provide that posting ipsissimis verbis.
It very conveniently was supposedly posted at the old CSB, at some undefined time when no longtime, regular poster ever saw it.

So either this is a bizarrre case of group selective amnesia, or...
"The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed." -- Eileen Rose

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Ban her

Post by Gob »

Whoever's pulling her strings has overworked their puppet this time.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Timster
Posts: 967
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:43 am

Re: Ban her

Post by Timster »

Thank you for the link Sean I had no idea how bad it is really got to. Fuck me pink!@ :roll: :(
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

Arthur Schopenhauer-

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Ban her

Post by Sean »

No worries Tim. I'm sure you can see now why this has to end.
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Ban her

Post by Sean »

The only question remaining now is that of lo's whereabouts. She wanted to chat to Hen with a mediator and now she's got it. Has she changed her mind? Has her bluff been called?

And yes, I know that it has only been just over 24 hours but it is unusual for her not to log in at least once a day when there's drama happening.

Maybe the lesson to be learned is that you should be careful what you wish for...
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
The Hen
Posts: 5941
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:56 am

Re: Ban her

Post by The Hen »

Lack of character?

Nah. That was unfounded. She could have had another engagement. I have a few over the next couple of days that will curtail my input.

If she had accepted the mediation and we had established ground rules for the mediation, she could have had the floor all by herself for a period of time.

THAT would have shown me.

:lol:
Bah!

Image

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Ban her

Post by Sean »

True Hen, real life does sometimes get in the way but it would be most unusual and coincidental for lo...
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Ban her

Post by Lord Jim »

I have to agree with Hen; this is certainly not the first time that LoCa hasn't posted for one day, I wouldn't draw any conclusion from that...

This mediation idea was hers; why would she want to back away from it?

If she comes on the board and starts posting about other things and ignoring this, then you'd have a point...
ImageImageImage

Andrew D
Posts: 3150
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:01 pm
Location: North California

Re: Ban her

Post by Andrew D »

What, exactly, is to be mediated?

Yes, I realize that I can be directed to various threads in which various assertions are made and in which various accusations are hurled.

But the first thing which any competent mediator should -- and in real life would -- insist upon is a clear and reasonably concise statement by each party of what that party considers to be the matter(s) in dispute.

Side A: State your claim and the basis upon which you make it.

Side B: State your claim and the basis upon which you make it.

Give your mediator something to mediate.
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.

User avatar
Daisy
Posts: 1578
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 9:15 am

Re: Ban her

Post by Daisy »

Funnily enough THAT was my plan. We are still awaiting loCA to agree to the mediation.

User avatar
The Hen
Posts: 5941
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:56 am

Re: Ban her

Post by The Hen »

The only thread where any assertions have been made was the one Sean directed you concerning the article of child sexual abuse where Lo decided to go off on some kind of tangent and make horrific allegations about my childhood and claim I was lying to deny them, Andrew.

Other that that there is this thread and the "LoCAtek's Attention Thread" thread to read. It isn't that much material.

There are other threads on the Board where she has baited me and got some back in response. I do not believe that those threads have anything to do with this outburst as she has not raised them to this point.

In respect to this issue, I have made no assertions other than I have never posted that I willingly gave away my virginity at nine.
Bah!

Image

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Ban her

Post by Gob »

Andrew D wrote:What, exactly, is to be mediated?
Ask Lo, it's her fucking stupid idea.

Best to see if you can catch her sober though. Try ringing her at 4.00 am.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

Post Reply