But now I see

Gob · Post by **Gob** » Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:44 pm

Meade nailed it.

dales · Post by **dales** » Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:50 pm

Gob · Post by **Gob** » Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:01 pm

I had to do it of course, I had to go see what retard had posted. So here we go.

I post a joke about Meade and his operation, unfortunately forgetting to name him in the process.

Hen points out to me that it could be misinterpreted as a joke on retard's operation.

As everyone knows, retard has the intellectual and social skills of yeast, and the ability to understand and take "a joke" of peach mold, I decide to, rather than just name Meade, to remove the joke and apologise (it wasn't that funny in any case.)

What does retard do in reply to this courtesy? He posts a barely intelligible insult calling me a troll, for removing what he could have considered a potential slight against him.

Thus proving he has has the intellectual and social skills of yeast.

You couldn't make it up! Is it possible to be simplistic enough, in social interaction terms, for retard to understand?

Stick to posting other people's graphs retard, social interaction isn't your forte.

Sue U · Post by **Sue U** » Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:09 pm

Gob wrote: social skills of yeast

Looks pretty sociable to me.

rubato · Post by **rubato** » Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:06 am

MajGenl.Meade wrote:
Gob wrote:Removed my comment, which was aimed at Meade, (who would have seen the joke,) but could have been construed as being aimed at rubato, (who would not have.)

So you mean although I would have seen, now I don't get to see? I see.

rubato, I get your point but also look at it another way. I may have understood something in reference to me as amusing (perhaps owing to some prior comms between Gob and myself; perhaps realising it was aimed at me). But that same statement, if applied to some other person, might be taken seriously and cause offense.

On a simplistic level, where I'm comfortable, if Gob said "You're a pratt" and it was clearly said to me - I'd assume it in the friendly, pissed-in-a-bar, punch in the shoulder kind of way. But if you thought that Gob was saying that you are a pratt, I think you would be offended and probably rightly so. See? I wouldn't be offended if Meade and rubato names were swopped in the above quote - I'd just assume Gob had reason to think that his deleted statement would not have been seen by me as a joke if I thought it was aimed at me.

Well that's all right then

Cheers
Meade

Except that Gob's followup post proves that the original was with malice aforethought. Pure troll and a liar to boot.

Yeast is a beneficial organism (not being female).

yrs,
rubato

Gob · Post by **Gob** » Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:22 am

So in other words, retard's social skills, and reading compression, is still on par with that of frogspawn. There was no malice in the original, and as I say; Meade would have the sense of humour and understanding to have taken the joke as offered. Retard has neither of those qualities. He doesn't have the nous to see that I was being courteous, and to accept the courtesy as offered, and goes on to further shitsprays himself with his usual rancid bile.

rubato · Post by **rubato** » Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:33 am

A gratuitous insult is courtesy? You could have deleted the original post w/o adding the personal insult. You chose what you would do and who you would be.

yrs,
rubato

Lord Jim · Post by **Lord Jim** » Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:44 am

"Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!"

Gob · Post by **Gob** » Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:57 am

rubato wrote:A gratuitous insult is courtesy? You could have deleted the original post w/o adding the personal insult. You chose what you would do and who you would be.

yrs,
rubato

Gob wrote:Removed my comment, which was aimed at Meade, (who would have seen the joke,) but could have been construed as being aimed at rubato, (who would not have.)

Please point out the gratuitous insult retard.

Lord Jim · Post by **Lord Jim** » Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:00 am

I believe he's saying that the gratuitous insult is claiming that he wouldn't understand humor....

Which he has been going out of his way to prove ever since....

rubato · Post by **rubato** » Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:14 am

Gob wrote:
rubato wrote:A gratuitous insult is courtesy? You could have deleted the original post w/o adding the personal insult. You chose what you would do and who you would be.

yrs,
rubato

Gob wrote:Removed my comment, which was aimed at Meade, (who would have seen the joke,) but could have been construed as being aimed at rubato, (who would not have.)
Please point out the gratuitous insult retard.

"
Re: But now I see

Postby Gob » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:42 pm
Removed my comment, which was aimed at Meade, (who would have seen the joke,) but could have been construed as being aimed at rubato, (who would not have.)"

You're weak and a liar.

Look, I don't really care. I only underline the obvious for those who are capable of honesty. You are not.

yrs,
rubato

Gob · Post by **Gob** » Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:37 am

Don't call me a liar you rancid little cunt. Next time I will not bother trying to do the decent thing by you, for the sake of some board peace and quiet, as you don't have the dignity to accept an honest explaination.

Back on ignore for you, you undignified little wanker.

The Hen · Post by **The Hen** » Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:11 am

Ferfucksake Rube -

Gob had you on ignore.

He posted a comment to Meade.

I noticed that it might have been construed as rude to you. I asked him to change the comment as he hadn't read what you had posted.

He did.

And you are calling him a liar?

Grow up.

Gob, I am sorry I bothered.

MajGenl.Meade · Post by **MajGenl.Meade** » Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:59 am

Meadeation! Meadeation! My turn!

"What's going on?"

BoSoxGal · Post by **BoSoxGal** » Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:44 am

Would it kill Gob and LJ to quit the name-calling and shit re: rubato?

I'm no special friend of rubato's, but I certainly see a lot of unprovoked comments directed his way. If I were him, I'm sure I'd retort in kind on occasion, too.

We just got rid of some true unpleasantness here. Let's not stir up other shit. I'd sure be impressed if y'all could put aside the sophomoric BS.

Gob · Post by **Gob** » Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:26 am

bigskygal wrote:Would it kill Gob and LJ to quit the name-calling and shit re: rubato?

If you followed the thread BSG, you'd see that's exactly what I did. I removed a comment which could have been interpreted by retard as an insult to him. (It was actually an insult to Meade.)

Gob wrote:Removed my comment, which was aimed at Meade, (who would have seen the joke,) but could have been construed as being aimed at rubato, (who would not have.)

My thanks for doing it?

rubato wrote:

Your truly determined and hate-filled poster can remove the comment while leaving the insult intact!

Troll-troll-troll your boat.

yrs,
rubato

Which, apart from being illiterate, just goes to show how poor his comprehension is.

So how about retard takes his share here eh?

BoSoxGal · Post by **BoSoxGal** » Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:47 am

Calling him retard is great extension of the olive branch.

I noticed this stuff in another thread - you or LJ, I can't recall which - just after loCA was removed for trolling.

In that case, it was name calling, etc. lobbed at rubato who'd done nothing but state an opinion on the subject of the thread.

I realize there's no point in my remarking on this, because nothing will change. A few of you have decided rubato is deserving of this treatment and it obviously goes back way before I ever posted here or CSB.

I just find it rather tiresome, and perhaps just a wee bit hypocritical.

Gob · Post by **Gob** » Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:19 am

I replied to him as "rubato" in my original post, and that was done for exactly the reasons you request.

Beer Sponge · Post by **Beer Sponge** » Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:40 pm

bigskygal wrote: ...sophomoric BS.

You rang?

dales · Post by **dales** » Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:42 pm

Live and let live, I say.