Fred Speaks His Mind - or - Toxic Non-PC Claptrap?

[dales]

http://www.fredoneverything.net/Zimmerman.shtml

The Need to Lynch Zimmerman

The Coming Race War in America

April 19, 2012



The Coming Race War in America was published in 1996 by Carl Rowan, the black columnist and former ambassador to Finland. The title is not ironic. He foresaw a major racial explosion. The book of course was furiously ignored. It should not have been. It dealt with an apocalyptic vision that has lurked around the edges of American consciousness since before the Civil War. And still does. We just don’t talk about it.

What has this to do with Zimmerman?

This: Our racial policy has proved a disaster. Sixty years after Brown vs. the School Board, blacks have not assimilated. They constitute a separate people having almost nothing in common with the surrounding European society. They fiercely maintain their identity with their own music, dialect, customs, dress, and names. All attempts to turn them into middle-class whites in darker packaging have failed. Only relentless governmental pressure forces an appearance of partial integration.

Let’s consider a few awkward facts that loom ghoulishly above the body politic, which seems to be decomposing. First, on every known measure of cognitive ability, on IQ, SATs, GREs, everything, blacks average about one standard deviation, fifteen IQ points, below whites. The gap is a fact. It exists. It is reflected in performance. It has proved intractable. In a technological civilization that rewards intelligence, the deficit sharply limits legitimate access to the higher reaches of money, power, class, and prestige.

Second, blacks continue to show little interest in schooling. Exceptions and degrees, yes. Yet consider cities such as Washington, which usually has a black mayor, black city council, mostly black school board, black staffs in the schools, black parents, black students, a high per-capita expenditure—and perhaps the worst schools in the country. This is a fact, and shows no signs of diminishing. It is repeated in countless cities.

If the United State had large numbers of manual jobs that paid a living wage, as for example assembling cars, things might not be so bad. But the United States no longer has many such jobs. The economy has no need for huge numbers of people who read at the level of second-graders, if that. The existence of these people is a fact. When such jobs exist, as for example on police forces, better qualified whites are invariably available. Without remedial intervention, the academic and professional worlds, the managerial ranks of blue-collar trades, would turn almost pure white, and there would be actual hunger in the inner cities.

The solution, to the extent that it can be called a solution, has been a combination of welfare and affirmative action. Each has produced its own kind of dependency. Whites in their own way depend on welfare payments to blacks in that ending welfare would send the cities up in flames. We now have dense concentrations of unemployed, unemployable blacks leading meaningless lives in rotting cities. They are angry, blame whites for their troubles, and do not have a lot to lose. The torching of Los Angeles in 1992 is endlessly repeatable. Only a spark is needed.

None of this improves, and it seems to be getting worse. On the Drudge Report and elsewhere on the web, video after cell phone video appears of pack-attacks by feral blacks on whites and Asians. These attacks often result in brain damage: the attackers are trying to hurt the victims badly, and usually laugh while doing it. Other videos time and again show black teenagers looting Seven-Elevens. The perpetrators show no signs of worry about being caught. They know that white police wouldn’t dare arrest thirty black adolescents.

Whites are frightened of blacks. They are afraid of taking the wrong exit from the freeway and ending up in a black ghetto. They are afraid when they pass young black males in a dark neighborhood. White women clutch their purses and cross the street, try not to get into elevators with them. The fear, seldom mentioned, determines where whites live, where they go, and where they send their children to school.

This unacknowledged fear engenders unacknowledged consequences. When white men buy guns, journalistic organs of that prissy rectitude we call political correctness—the Washington Post, probably National Review—speak of gun nuts, psychosexual inadequacies, and sordid fantasies. Hardly. The purchasers of guns have in mind defending their families should the need arise. The buyers do not fear attack by Jewish violinists.

Government also is afraid of blacks. Los Angeles burned because blacks didn’t like the outcome of a trial. Recently cities in England went up because a policeman shot a black. The Zimmerman shooting looks very similar, and blacks are very angry. Jesse Jackson has said that Trayvon was “hunted down like a rabid dog in the street,” that he was “murdered and martyred,” that it was a “hate crime.”

These are the words of a man looking for a fight. One may be available. Charging Zimmerman with murder buys time. If he is acquitted….

The signs are ominous. Tension rises in America. Incomes fall, foreclosures rise, jobs go east, police powers increase, trust in government evaporates, and expectations for the future decline. An unfocused edginess germinates. It is not a recipe for domestic tranquility.

The response of whites to riots by blacks has always been to back away. This prudence, as it is thought to be, has been enforced by the government. If a minority in Russia started burning cities, the army would shoot the rioters on sight. America doesn’t work that way, or hasn’t recently. The lack of consequences for beatings and flash-mobbings, the history of saying “racism” and walking, produces a sense of untouchability in blacks. It could be a mistake.

A spring is being wound. On one hand, when you live in a sprawling tightly packed concentration of people like yourself, it is easy to forget that you are very much a minority, that the majority holds all the high cards, and that food doesn’t really come from Safeway.

On the other hand, via the internet whites now know of the racial attacks, and grow quietly very sick of them. There is among many white men an undercurrent of “Bring it on.” This is not confined merely to cops, soldiers, conservatives, Southerners, westerners, the rural and the blue-collar. You can find it, carefully hidden, in federal offices and even among men in newsrooms. The extent of this sentiment is easy to underestimate. Those who share it don’t dare express it, and most journalists live in ideological bubbles.

We must lynch Zimmerman.

[Grim Reaper]

It almost sounds like he wishes we could roll things back to before the Civil Rights Act.

[Scooter]

Before the Civil War, more like.

[Econoline]

That piece of claptrap looks like it was written by someone who doesn't actually know any black people. It contains so many bald assertions that are flat-out wrong that it would take a much more patient man than me to go through it and do a point-by-point refutation. It's depressing that people like this still exist.

Fortunately, I live in a country where Barack Obama was elected President by a significant majority of its citizens, so I'll just have to take comfort and hope where I find it.

[BoSoxGal]

The latter.

[kristina]

What BSG said.

[rubato]

"... The book of course was furiously ignored. ... "

This is the work of an A-list demagogue. How does 'furiously ignored' appear differently from 'quietly ignored', 'ignored due to lack of intellectual content' or just plain old vanilla (this is too stupid to comment on)"ignored"?

Its different because Fred wants everyone to think the book was important because it stokes the racist-paranoia-world-view he makes a living from and has to explain how everyone else thought it was too stupid to comment upon.

Fred is a jackass.

yrs,
rubato

[Grim Reaper]

Actually, you can read chapter 1 of Carl Rowan's book here. In the first chapter, he sets up his theory that right wing white supremacists will be the ones to ignite the race war.

So I guess he's hoping it will remain "furiously" ignored so that people don't bother reading too much about what he's trying to say.

[Lord Jim]

he sets up his theory that right wing white supremacists will be the one to ignite the race war.

I thought that's what Charlie was trying to do.....

(Dale, that's your cue.... )

[dales]

lottsapoppa?

[dgs49]

Actually, there are not so many "bald assertions" that they could not be refuted quickly if they were false. But I guess it's easier just to write, "...It contains so many bald assertions that are flat-out wrong..." Then you don't have to back it up.

It is ironic in the extreme that the things that the sainted Martin Luther King fought for (basically, treatment and consideration of "Negro's" based on merit) were rejected by the do-gooders and political whores who followed, in favor of a categorical demand for SPECIAL treatment and consideration.

In the 50's, middle class Negro children were told that they had to be better than their White peers if they wanted to succeed, but by the 70's those same Afro-American children were being taught that if they did not succeed it was only because of racism, thus justifying a lack of diligence and effort. They were told (and continue to be told) that they are entitled to the same OUTCOMES as successful White people, regardless of merit. And the conspicuous differences in OUTCOMES is PROOF of a racist society, determined to "keep the Black Man down."

But it is not White racists who are forcing Black women to pop out tens of thousands of bastards every year, or to glorify drug dealers, pimps, "rappers," and other professional slackers. It is not White racists who spawned a Black culture that disdains academic effort, proper English, common courtesy, and respect for persons and property. That is all born and bred in the Black community. Black-on-Black crime far outstrips White-on-Black crime, which is highlighted in the news to give the false impression that it is endemic.

Unfortunately for the Poverty Pimps like Sharpton and Jackson, this is not a racist society. They have to jump on the figurative back of Treyvon Martin because there are so few examples of White racism for "prove" their point. The fact is that Blacks who are reasonably qualified and apply for school admissions and good jobs are welcomed by employers, largely because they are so rare. I've been working in manufacturing and engineering for decades, and we NEVER see qualified Blacks applying, even for recent grad-type jobs. Most of the "Blacks" who work where I am now (about 6,000 people locally) are AFRICAN, not African-American. Figure that one out.

As for a "Race War," I just don't see it happening. Just because the White population is not shooting each other in the streets does not mean it is not armed.

[BoSoxGal]

[Lord Jim]

This is Fred:



Fred looks to be a couple of enchiladas short of a combination platter....

(Or maybe he's just going for the Hunter S. Thompson look....)

[Grim Reaper]

Actually, there are not so many "bald assertions" that they could not be refuted quickly if they were false. But I guess it's easier just to write, "...It contains so many bald assertions that are flat-out wrong..." Then you don't have to back it up.

You're right, it is easier to just right out that something's not true than to look it up to make sure. Kinda like what you just did.

What Fred did was grossly oversimplify the facts. What he said might technically be true, but you have to look at the whole system to get the real story.

Unfortunately for the Poverty Pimps like Sharpton and Jackson, this is not a racist society.

This is amusing coming from you. The same person who tried to redefine "African-American" just to find another way to call President Obama a liar.