There may be elements of truth there Scooter but I think you overstate the case by quite a lot in suggesting the media "never saw fit" to criticize the apartheid regime. This is from the current SA Consulate General (NY) website
http://www.southafrica-newyork.net/oldc ... e/news.htm:
History of the Press in South Africa
During the apartheid era, newspapers had to apply for registration if they published more than 11 times a year. An arbitrary amount was also required before registration was approved.
The government also enforced regulations controlling what newspapers could or could not publish, especially relating to articles and comment on activities against the apartheid system. Newspapers were, for instance, not allowed to quote banned organisations and their spokesmen, or report on conditions inside prisons or the activities of the security forces.
At the height of the anti-apartheid struggle in the 1980s, when two states of emergency were declared, censorship regulations were tightened. Newspapers were barred from reporting on any demonstrations or activity against the apartheid government or any of its laws.
The threat of closure forced newspaper editors to apply a self-censorship policy, while other papers printed blank pages or whole paragraphs blacked out as a sign of protest.
Even a generally hostile (to whites) alternative view at
http://ixwa.hubpages.com/hub/Blaming-Th ... g-Africans agrees that newspapers (particularly 'English' as opposed to Afrikaans) were prevented by government, by police (and in the case of the latter especially by concerns about advertizing and by racial solidarity as you indicate) from openly reporting.
I think you also discredit the genuine desire of South Africans, in the main and not perfectly of course, to live in a multi-racial democracy free from racial bias and classification. The ANC problem (and not all ministers are black by the way) is that it is increasingly becoming the Nationalists in all but name and open declaration. Given the trend continuing, in five or ten or fifteen years (and the lower number seems more likely) Zapiro will be in prison along with his colleagues, black and white, who dare to report on the abuses of power engaged in by the government.
The Constitutional conference created one of the most liberal constitutions in the world (always an advantage to do this kind of thing after everyone else has) and the ANC now desires, more than anything, to restrict that Constitution. That is, they do not want the independent judiciary to stay independent. The problem for them is that the judges - mostly black - seem to want to say whether or not Parliament's laws and ANC diktats are consitutional. This is a gross violation of "democracy" - it is contary to the spirit of "advancement" and "equality" - it is simply not good enough for unelected people to say what is and is not legal.
Secondly, the ANC wants to place the media under government control via the Information act - the newspapers are "gossips" when they report on abuses by the leadership - of millions of rands being spent on cars, hotels, trips abroad, shopping, visiting mistresses and so on. They are "usurping the legal process" (see above for irony) when they report on the massive, and you'd best believe it Scooter, corruption of the power elites (black and white) who are robbing the poor and the disadvantaged (sorry "previously disadvantaged" because their lives are now just fine, just fine).
The issue is not at all that "blacks can't govern". THE best voices here are black. The opposition is mostly black - when COSATU and others helped ruin the toll-gate boondoggle in Joburg that was black people the ANC was forced to listen to - they don't give a monkey's fcuk what white people think.
But I agree you will find racist arseholes who say things like "they" can't do this and "they" can't do that. Those kinds of people have no voice though. Except on the internet and in tweeting I suppose.
And maybe you should take a look at a newspaper like "The Sowetan" - you are not going to be able to say those folks think "blacks can't govern" - they think that corrupt swine can't govern. And they are quite right
Meade
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts