Detroit, whose 139 square miles contain 60 percent fewer residents than in 1950, will try to nudge them into a smaller living space by eliminating almost half its streetlights.
As it is, 40 percent of the 88,000 streetlights are broken and the city, whose finances are to be overseen by an appointed board, can’t afford to fix them. Mayor Dave Bing’s plan would create an authority to borrow $160 million to upgrade and reduce the number of streetlights to 46,000. Maintenance would be contracted out, saving the city $10 million a year.
Enlarge image Half of Detroit’s Lights Might Go Dark as City Shrinks Itself
Other U.S. cities have gone partially dark to save money, among them Colorado Springs; Santa Rosa, California; and Rockford, Illinois. Detroit’s plan goes further: It would leave sparsely populated swaths unlit in a community of 713,000 that covers more area than Boston, Buffalo and San Francisco combined. Vacant property and parks account for 37 square miles (96 square kilometers), according to city planners.
“You have to identify those neighborhoods where you want to concentrate your population,” said Chris Brown, Detroit’s chief operating officer. “We’re not going to light distressed areas like we light other areas.”
Detroit’s dwindling income and property-tax revenue have required residents to endure unreliable buses and strained police services throughout the city. Because streetlights are basic to urban life, deciding what areas to illuminate will reshape the city, said Kirk Cheyfitz, co-founder of a project called Detroit143 -- named for the 139 square miles of land, plus water -- that publicizes neighborhood issues.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-2 ... rinks.html
Detroit in the dark.
Detroit in the dark.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Detroit in the dark.
"Panic In Detroit"
He looked a lot like Che Guevara,
drove a diesel van
Kept his gun in quiet seclusion,
such a humble man
The only survivor of the National People's Gang
Panic in Detroit, I asked for an autograph
He wanted to stay home, I wish someone would phone
Panic in Detroit
He laughed at accidental sirens that broke the evening
gloom
The police had warned of repercussions
They followed none too soon
A trickle of strangers were all that were left alive
Panic in Detroit, I asked for an autograph
He wanted to stay home, I wish someone would phone
Panic in Detroit
Putting on some clothes I made my way to school
And I found my teacher
crouching in his overalls
I screamed and ran to smash my favorite slot machine
And jumped the silent cars that slept at traffic lights
Having scored a trillion dollars,
made a run back home
Found him slumped across the table.
A gun and me alone
I ran to the window. Looked for a plane or two
Panic in Detroit.
He'd left me an autograph
"Let me collect dust."
I wish someone would phone
Panic in Detroit
~David Bowie
He looked a lot like Che Guevara,
drove a diesel van
Kept his gun in quiet seclusion,
such a humble man
The only survivor of the National People's Gang
Panic in Detroit, I asked for an autograph
He wanted to stay home, I wish someone would phone
Panic in Detroit
He laughed at accidental sirens that broke the evening
gloom
The police had warned of repercussions
They followed none too soon
A trickle of strangers were all that were left alive
Panic in Detroit, I asked for an autograph
He wanted to stay home, I wish someone would phone
Panic in Detroit
Putting on some clothes I made my way to school
And I found my teacher
crouching in his overalls
I screamed and ran to smash my favorite slot machine
And jumped the silent cars that slept at traffic lights
Having scored a trillion dollars,
made a run back home
Found him slumped across the table.
A gun and me alone
I ran to the window. Looked for a plane or two
Panic in Detroit.
He'd left me an autograph
"Let me collect dust."
I wish someone would phone
Panic in Detroit
~David Bowie
Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato
Re: Detroit in the dark.
They should just raze huge swaths of the city to the ground and plant it with turnips hoping that it can reinvigorate the rest of the city and recreate growth in an orderly and sustainable way.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell
Re: Detroit in the dark.
Historically cities have grown up and collapsed or at least contracted a number of times when the reason for their existence disappeared or when geography dictated their end (desertification (Timbuktu), loss of building materials (Chaco Canyon), loss of water supply (Moche? coastal S. America), loss of a trade route (Petra), changing water levels (Ankor Wat?) ).
Detroit has been an aching open sore for 50 years now, all of our instincts were developed with the underlying idea that everything grows and expands and that shaped the skills we learned. We never learned how to retreat gracefully. Now the USPS is having to learn the lessons of retraction and finding it painful (even for the best postal system in the world, bar none). And we will have Detroits of the future to contend with. What will happen to the populations of Arizona, Texas, and Florida when rising sea levels and a dying population base combine? We already have the overbuilt inland California cities extruding post-modern ghost towns (all conservative as hell and all doomed because of it).
The avoidable mistake was to deny reality.
yrs,
rubato
Detroit has been an aching open sore for 50 years now, all of our instincts were developed with the underlying idea that everything grows and expands and that shaped the skills we learned. We never learned how to retreat gracefully. Now the USPS is having to learn the lessons of retraction and finding it painful (even for the best postal system in the world, bar none). And we will have Detroits of the future to contend with. What will happen to the populations of Arizona, Texas, and Florida when rising sea levels and a dying population base combine? We already have the overbuilt inland California cities extruding post-modern ghost towns (all conservative as hell and all doomed because of it).
The avoidable mistake was to deny reality.
yrs,
rubato
Last edited by rubato on Fri May 25, 2012 12:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Detroit in the dark.
Yeah, rube.
Those rock-solid GOP conservatives sure ruined Detroit!
LOL!
Those rock-solid GOP conservatives sure ruined Detroit!
LOL!
Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato
Re: Detroit in the dark.
San Bernardino, Riverside, Inland San Diego, Stockton, Merced, Modesto, Fresno all have the worst problems from stupid housing construction.dales wrote:Yeah, rube.
Those rock-solid GOP conservatives sure ruined Detroit!
LOL!
Try to approximate cogency, ok?
yrs,
rubato
Re: Detroit in the dark.
San Bernardino, Riverside, Inland San Diego, Stockton, Merced, Modesto, Fresno all have the worst problems from stupid housing construction.
And yet, with the exception of Stockton, every single town on that list is a safer place to live than that bastion of proper liberal governance Santa "Dodge City" Cruz....Go figure...
http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/santa-cruz/crime/
The Mayor of Santa Cruz ought to go to Riverside or Fresno and take notes to try and figure out what he's doing wrong ....
Oh, and I almost forgot...
Try to approximate cogency, ok?
yrs,
rubato

GRATUITOUS INSULT ALERT!!!!
GRATUITOUS INSULT ALERT!!!!
GRATUITOUS INSULT ALERT!!!!



Re: Detroit in the dark.
Rube and reality have only a passing acquaintance.dales wrote:Yeah, rube.
Those rock-solid GOP conservatives sure ruined Detroit!
LOL!
Detroit should be rented out by the acre for target practice.
Treat Gaza like Carthage.
Re: Detroit in the dark.
3 people none of whom could read and comprehend the orig. post.
All running to form.
yrs,
rubato
All running to form.
yrs,
rubato
Re: Detroit in the dark.
I'll give you another chance at it.rubato wrote:Historically cities have grown up and collapsed or at least contracted a number of times when the reason for their existence disappeared or when geography dictated their end (desertification (Timbuktu), loss of building materials (Chaco Canyon), loss of water supply (Moche? coastal S. America), loss of a trade route (Petra), changing water levels (Ankor Wat?) ).
Detroit has been an aching open sore for 50 years now, all of our instincts were developed with the underlying idea that everything grows and expands and that shaped the skills we learned. We never learned how to retreat gracefully. Now the USPS is having to learn the lessons of retraction and finding it painful (even for the best postal system in the world, bar none). And we will have Detroits of the future to contend with. What will happen to the populations of Arizona, Texas, and Florida when rising sea levels and a dying population base combine? We already have the overbuilt inland California cities extruding post-modern ghost towns (all conservative as hell and all doomed because of it).
The avoidable mistake was to deny reality.
yrs,
rubato
yrs,
rubato
Re: Detroit in the dark.
How's grossly oversimplified and ignores major contributing factors (riots, corruption, mismanagement)
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.
Re: Detroit in the dark.
Ok, four people who cannot read.
1.
The opening paragraph points out that cities have come and gone over time for different reasons, climate, geography, &c (politics is not mentioned).
2.
The second paragraph says that we are not skilled in dealing with population declines or declines in general (the USPS for example) because our experience is mostly that of growth.
3.
As an aside it is mentioned that we have several candidates for future population declines due to lack of regulation of the housing market, and as it happens all of them are the most conservative parts of Calif.
Most of the post was not read or understood by any of you. Now Dales was just trying to be a smartass but all of you fell into the hole he dug on your own.
Irrational hatred is not an excuse for lack of cogency.
yrs,
rubato
1.
The opening paragraph points out that cities have come and gone over time for different reasons, climate, geography, &c (politics is not mentioned).
2.
The second paragraph says that we are not skilled in dealing with population declines or declines in general (the USPS for example) because our experience is mostly that of growth.
3.
As an aside it is mentioned that we have several candidates for future population declines due to lack of regulation of the housing market, and as it happens all of them are the most conservative parts of Calif.
Most of the post was not read or understood by any of you. Now Dales was just trying to be a smartass but all of you fell into the hole he dug on your own.
Irrational hatred is not an excuse for lack of cogency.
yrs,
rubato
Re: Detroit in the dark.
LOL
And for you to try to claim that the gratuitous swipe at conservatives in your post was an "aside" is too laughable for words...
That is never an "aside" with you rube....
Anyone that has read your posts for the past 12 years, knows that expressing your seething, loathing, deep and abiding hatred for any and all things conservative is no "aside"....
It is the primary, defining characteristic of your presence here...it is expressed in 90% of what you post....it is your whole raison d'art....(though I think it's also pretty clear that most of the time your attacks on conservatives are really something you use as a surrogate fora attacking the conservative people on the board that you hate...including of course, your humble corespondent....ditto your attacks on Christianity...though it's probably some of both...you have exhibited a pretty much limitless capacity for hatred...)
And if you're going to claim, (as you frequently do, and did in this case) that there is some causal link between conservatism and a place being poorly run, it is perfectly fair game for someone, (as I did here) to present evidence that the place where you live, (which happens to be run by liberals) ain't exactly paradise....
We already have the overbuilt inland California cities extruding post-modern ghost towns (all conservative as hell and all doomed because of it).
If you believe that saying the towns were "doomed because" they are conservative has the same meaning as saying "as it happens" they are conservative, then there's only one person in this exchange with a reading comprehension problem...As an aside it is mentioned that we have several candidates for future population declines due to lack of regulation of the housing market, and as it happens all of them are the most conservative parts of Calif.
And for you to try to claim that the gratuitous swipe at conservatives in your post was an "aside" is too laughable for words...
That is never an "aside" with you rube....
Anyone that has read your posts for the past 12 years, knows that expressing your seething, loathing, deep and abiding hatred for any and all things conservative is no "aside"....
It is the primary, defining characteristic of your presence here...it is expressed in 90% of what you post....it is your whole raison d'art....(though I think it's also pretty clear that most of the time your attacks on conservatives are really something you use as a surrogate fora attacking the conservative people on the board that you hate...including of course, your humble corespondent....ditto your attacks on Christianity...though it's probably some of both...you have exhibited a pretty much limitless capacity for hatred...)
And if you're going to claim, (as you frequently do, and did in this case) that there is some causal link between conservatism and a place being poorly run, it is perfectly fair game for someone, (as I did here) to present evidence that the place where you live, (which happens to be run by liberals) ain't exactly paradise....
Last edited by Lord Jim on Fri May 25, 2012 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Re: Detroit in the dark.
I just waht to know what the USPS has to do wwith this thread
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.
Re: Detroit in the dark.
When flying commercial airlines at night I have often wondered what is the point of having so many cities lit up like mid-day in the middle of the night. The idea that neurotically brilliant street-lighting suppresses criminal activity has long proven false. More cities should take a second look at their lighting expense and scale it back a bit.
Ironically, Detroit has a lot going for it. There remain very nice UMC and MC neighborhoods where very desirable housing can be purchased at quite reasonable cost. For those with skills, a good work ethic, or a relevant education, the job market is fine, thank you very much. There is a lot to do, and the rivers and lakes provide not only scenic pleasure, but the opportunity for various sorts of recreation. The ability to pop over to Canada for dinner or shopping is a nice plus. The professional sports teams are doing quite well, as are sales of luxury boxes and whatnot.
There are incredible real-estate investment opportunities, though not without some risk, and a resurgence to some extent is inevitable, given the city's great location, good roads, and the now-thriving auto industry (along with the related industries that support it).
But City government is poor-third-world, largely due to a level of corruption and self-dealing that is astounding to outsiders. The city is economically and legally bankrupt, and like everyplace else that is run by Democrats, in hock to its unions. One can only hope that the City government is shortly ushered into a benevolent form of receivership, in which all existing contracts can be renegotiated, services can be out-sourced, and the school system turned over to a competent management firm.
I can dream, can't I?
Honestly, I visit the Detroit area 4-5 times a year, and I like it. The depressing statistics about the City's population and economy mask pockets of prosperity and culture that are attractive and thriving.
Ironically, Detroit has a lot going for it. There remain very nice UMC and MC neighborhoods where very desirable housing can be purchased at quite reasonable cost. For those with skills, a good work ethic, or a relevant education, the job market is fine, thank you very much. There is a lot to do, and the rivers and lakes provide not only scenic pleasure, but the opportunity for various sorts of recreation. The ability to pop over to Canada for dinner or shopping is a nice plus. The professional sports teams are doing quite well, as are sales of luxury boxes and whatnot.
There are incredible real-estate investment opportunities, though not without some risk, and a resurgence to some extent is inevitable, given the city's great location, good roads, and the now-thriving auto industry (along with the related industries that support it).
But City government is poor-third-world, largely due to a level of corruption and self-dealing that is astounding to outsiders. The city is economically and legally bankrupt, and like everyplace else that is run by Democrats, in hock to its unions. One can only hope that the City government is shortly ushered into a benevolent form of receivership, in which all existing contracts can be renegotiated, services can be out-sourced, and the school system turned over to a competent management firm.
I can dream, can't I?
Honestly, I visit the Detroit area 4-5 times a year, and I like it. The depressing statistics about the City's population and economy mask pockets of prosperity and culture that are attractive and thriving.
Re: Detroit in the dark.
Ask rube & his gin bottle.Crackpot wrote:I just waht to know what the USPS has to do wwith this thread
Treat Gaza like Carthage.
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21436
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Detroit in the dark.
Gin? Gin? But that's no raisin d'art I tell you!


For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Detroit in the dark.
Crackpot wrote:I just waht to know what the USPS has to do wwith this thread
Jarlaxle wrote:Ask rube & his gin bottle.
(You might agree or disagree with it, but he did explain it.)rubato wrote:we are not skilled in dealing with population declines or declines in general (the USPS for example) because our experience is mostly that of growth.
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
Re: Detroit in the dark.
Or to Antioch, CA ....where I live....not really known as a "safe communtiry".Lord Jim wrote:San Bernardino, Riverside, Inland San Diego, Stockton, Merced, Modesto, Fresno all have the worst problems from stupid housing construction.
And yet, with the exception of Stockton, every single town on that list is a safer place to live than that bastion of proper liberal governance Santa "Dodge City" Cruz....Go figure...
http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/santa-cruz/crime/
The Mayor of Santa Cruz ought to go to Riverside or Fresno and take notes to try and figure out what he's doing wrong ....
http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/antioch/crime/
Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato
Re: Detroit in the dark.
Explain what? I still don't know what his post is about, unless, is was some self aggrandizing pontification that has nothing to do with the subject at hand. (and I would not put it past him) Beyond that he's also wrong because there are many cities that can deal with a rather large population contraction. Detroit and other cities that came of age post industrial revolution are somewhat special in that housing is by and large single family homes which create a lower population density. Meaning any population contraction is highly visible and harder to deal with. Detroit is an extreme example of this in that the City has been in decline for almost 50 years now even though the region has grown for most of that time. If it was not for Racist policies which lead to the riots the "white flight" and the subsequent horrible governance which lead to the continued drive of the population to the suburbs Detroit would be in a much different situation than it is now. THe good news is is they now have a largely responsible governance in place that is trying to fix the problems rather than punting it down the line while lining their pockets with as much cash as they can.Econoline wrote:Crackpot wrote:I just waht to know what the USPS has to do wwith this threadJarlaxle wrote:Ask rube & his gin bottle.(You might agree or disagree with it, but he did explain it.)rubato wrote:we are not skilled in dealing with population declines or declines in general (the USPS for example) because our experience is mostly that of growth.
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.