Something For Discussion (A possible rule)

[MajGenl.Meade]

Scooter, really. The statement "I lost my virginity at age 9" (which no-one except Loca has actually said) is not a "depiction" nor does it "describe" a person etc etc. And, supposing it were true that a female child had engaged in sex at the age of 9, would you not described the act of the MAN involved to be child-rape? I am absolutely drifting from any sense of reality over this entire discussion - taking such a pathetic looser (sic) so seriously and giving her exactly what everyone seems to believe she wants.

Meade

[Scooter]

To clarify something else. Loca (if you read carefully) did not (I think) say that the alleged sexual indiscretion and the alleged imps happened at the same time. She claimed to recall two posts from the same person - one about sex and one about imps.

No, she claimed the imps made noise in response to the alleged rape:

I beg your pardon, you mentioned at CSB years ago, your deflowering was at a much younger age, due to your 'fear of dying a virgin'. Nothing personal, you understand, in fact, the 'goblins' what did you call them? at your father's house, made a ruckus about it.

[Andrew D]

Thanks, Scooter.

For so neatly proving my point.

[Scooter]

And likewise for proving mine, Andrew.

[MajGenl.Meade]

I see what you referred to Scooter. But please read on (it's pathetic to do it but someone must!)

You've said you were much younger and consented due to: diggophobia, or fear of dying a virgin (which I doubt, since as was noted in this thread, the underage can't consent) ...and that the 'spirits' or 'voices' which Gob has also heard, at your father's house made vocal their displeasure.

"Which Gob has also heard" is very clear - for once she got tenses correct. Loca did not say that Gob was present at the time of the alleged (and mythical) sexual incident. And Hen was right to say that Loca was compounding vague memories of two posts into one totally erroneous post.

I don't defend the way Loca carries on. But let's not mistake what was said and create new stories - it sounds too much like Loca.

Meade

[Joe Guy]

One thing that loca has accomplished, whether intended or not, is to cause a lot of bickering about what she has accomplished, intended or not.

People are giving her too much power. She might be currently 'reloading,' but when she comes back she will love all of the disruption she has caused & attention she has brought to herself along with all of the sniping at each other.

Are these really the conversations that you want to waste your time on?

Don't let me stop you.

Have fun.

[MajGenl.Meade]

"taking such a pathetic looser (sic) so seriously and giving her exactly what everyone seems to believe she wants"

I hate to agree with you Joe - people will accuse you of finding it easy to say what you said.

Meade

[Andrew D]

Indeed.

Braids in the inkwell.

[Lord Jim]

I don't defend the way Loca carries on.

It sure looks like that's exactly what you're doing....(if not defending, certainly minimizing)

And there isn't a doubt in mind that she will see it that way....

[MajGenl.Meade]

LJ sometimes my flabber is extremely gasted. Scooter's been proved wrong - geddit? Wrong. You may think it's just fine to post stories about people saying things they didn't actually say..... oh wait - you don't! So that's all right then.

Meade

[Scooter]

Did she use those words? No. Did she even recognize the implications of the fairy tales she was inventing when she posted them? Probably not. And yet, those implications are clear. I guess not for the willfully blind...

[Andrew D]

It is entertaining to watch Scooter's crush on loCAtek play itself out ....

[Scooter]

Such a quip might work better if the object were not a perfect Kinsey six.

Unless you are intimating some secret knowledge about loCA that the rest of us are not privy to...

[Sean]

Nor has anyone suggested that Y cannot post "You are an idiot for saying that X is a child molester". What has been said is that to keep feeding the troll is just plain stupid.

Actually I beg to differ Gen'l...

No need to post "X" in response to "W". Just let "W" lay there. The members of the board can figure out what needs to be disgarded and what needs to be "entertained".

[MajGenl.Meade]

Did she use those words? No. Did she even recognize the implications of the fairy tales she was inventing when she posted them? Probably not. And yet, those implications are clear. I guess not for the willfully blind...

The words she didn't use are "Gob was in the same room at the same time watching all this going on". But oh.... that's what you claim she said - no sorry, sorry - you claimed that was what she meant, you naughty little mind-reader you!

Silly me - I thought you were implying that I was the one fabricating something when I quoted her directly.

Meade

Sean: correct. Nobody plus one

[Andrew D]

Hey, Scooter; keep on reconsidering that whole homosexuality thing. After all, people change ....

[Gob]

Hey, Scooter; keep on reconsidering that whole homosexuality thing. After all, people change ....

You certainly did.

[Scooter]

The words she didn't use are "Gob was in the same room at the same time watching all this going on". But oh.... that's what you claim she said

I certainly did not claim her intent was to say that Gob was present watching what was going on.

[MajGenl.Meade]

She accused Gob of >>>>>> Hen when she was nine years old (pedophilia).

When she said that Gob was the one who was allegedly with her.

She clearly says Gob was there to allegedly hear the "imps". So unless she was trying to say that he was standing around watching while someone else raped a nine year old girl...

Quite right Scooter. My mistake. You were far more repulsive and slimey

Meade

[Lord Jim]

to keep feeding the troll is just plain stupid.

Do you simply not see that that is precisely what you are doing?

Do you not see how this repeated jumping in to criticize people for responding to or condemning her behavior is going to do nothing but encourage her behavior?