Ban Belfast for Barnes

All the shit that doesn't fit!
If it doesn't go into the other forums, stick it in here.
A general free for all
User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by loCAtek »

Image
Lennox Barnes' life has come to a sad and bitter end. His story is heartbreaking and infuriating, with one part incomprehensible bureaucratic righteousness and three parts love, humanity and the shared will for profound change.

For those who haven't heard, the details of his short life are achingly tragic. In May 2010, Lennox Barnes was taken from his home in Belfast, Northern Ireland. His owners indicate that he was a model citizen -- that he had no known history of bad behavior, and no aggressive or violent actions in his past.

For two years he languished in an undisclosed penal facility deprived of contact with his loved ones or the outside world. His immediate and ever-expanding world family used all the forces at their disposal -- legislation, advocacy and public relations -- to gain his freedom. Their fight reached a crescendo this week and after two years of solitary confinement Lennox was executed with no opportunity for clemency.

Lennox was apprehended, imprisoned and finally killed because of what he looked like, not because of anything he did.

[Lennox was part Bull dog and Part American Black Lab, not at all a 'Pit Bull']


How could this happen in a first world country? Lennox was seized from his beloved family under the Dangerous Dogs Order of 1991. This law deems any dog "of the type known as the pit bull terrier" to be dangerous and illegal.

In 15 years of animal welfare work I've seen many unspeakable things. This story haunts me and fills me with rage. Why has Lennox's plight touched the hearts of hundreds of thousands of strangers throughout the world? Why has he become so much more than just one dog?

On a typical day thousands of dogs are brought to shelter facilities -- 35 a day in our nation's capital. Many are dumped like garbage in our lobbies. We are left to pick up the pieces; to heal them and find them new families.

Lennox was already part of a family. He was cherished by people who loved him dearly and who fought for him at great personal expense in a battle that dominated their lives for two years. At first they wanted him back home but in the end they were selflessly advocating for any solution that would save his life.

[Lennox was not just the family dog, but a therapy dog, trained and certified to assist a disabled child]
Many animals have nowhere to go. Yet Lennox had offers of sanctuary from some of the best-known dog advocates in the world. Dog trainer Victoria Stillwell went to Ireland trying in vain to meet with the Belfast City Council (BCC) or anyone with authority who would listen. She generously offered to pay all costs to re-home him in the United States and to take full responsibility for him for the rest of his life.

The BCC refused to communicate with her, as they had refused dialogue with so many others before. They were allegedly, breathtakingly heartless and cruel to Lennox, and his family, and to good people throughout the world who tried to engage them positively. Their callousness climaxed in their refusal to grant the Barnes family the chance to say goodbye, or collect Lennox's body and give him a proper burial.

Their recalcitrance led to rage among the frustrated public which converted into heated language and threats of violence. Websites called for the Olympic torch to bypass Belfast, and for people to boycott travel to Ireland forever or send hate mail to Belfast leaders. The BCC used this to cast themselves as victims, trying to scramble to the moral high ground. Yet if they had simply talked to people and shown a modicum of human decency, the anger would never have boiled.

I have seen this stubborn, virtuous desire to be right in many corners of the animal welfare world, and it never serves people or animals well. The BCC appear to have made mistakes others made before them: they shut their minds to new information and opinions; they repeated to themselves and through media spokespeople the mantra that they were right; and they hunkered down and became stingy with both information and compassion.

We are left with more questions than answers. Why couldn't unbiased behaviorists assess the dog? Why wouldn't they let anyone, including the family, see the dog -- up to and after his death? Were they abusing him? Had their lack of care led to his failing health or premature death? Had they violated the law and killed him before the appeal period was up? These were the only things that made sense in the face of a wall of silence and a bolted door. Their appalling behavior evoked anger and rage which, while understandable, is nonproductive unless it is properly channeled.

So how do we best channel the immense energy that has mobilized on Lennox's behalf? With each passing hour my own sadness and frustration evolves into a resolve to ensure that nothing of the like ever happens again to any other family. With Lennox's death can come the birth of a transformative legacy that will far outlive both his tragic circumstances and the political lives of the politicians who perpetrated them.

The most lasting thing we can do is destroy every vestige of appearance-based discrimination. Let's start calling it what it is -- canine racism. There is no place for this in a compassionate, enlightened society.

As animal care professionals we need to treat all animals as individuals through our words and actions. We must hold one another accountable to avoid those slippery slope practices that lead others to believe breed discrimination is acceptable -- including quotas on how many pit bull type dogs will be accepted, or separate temperament tests, or unique policies related to adoption of dogs who look a certain way.

On a larger scale, it means thwarting or striking down Breed Specific Legislation (BSL), which has consistently failed in communities around the world. BSL has no quantifiable impact on a decrease in dog bites or an increase in public safety. In several municipalities there have been costly legal challenges. And BSL is prohibitively expensive to enforce for taxpayers and municipalities alike. When Belfast City Councilman Pat McCarthy was asked on BBC Radio Ulster whether he would agree that their legislation needs to be reviewed, even he replied, "Yes, I certainly would."

In the nation's capital the Washington Humane Society worked in partnership with our City's leaders to establish an approach that is sensible and effective. Dogs are deemed dangerous or potentially dangerous based on a set of observed, concrete behaviors and criteria. Our approach is working. We would be honored to share the language and format and our legislative experience with anyone who is determined to implement similar behavior-based legislation in their own communities.

We will wrestle over how to best serve Lennox and others like him for a long time. For today I've done what comes most naturally: I went to our shelter and took home the oldest and most frightened dog, who happens to look a lot like Lennox. He is eight-years-old, with bad breath, kennel cough and a host of health challenges. He is sleeping peacefully at my side, the deep slumber of one who has finally left a stressful environment. We will give him love, treats, medicine, compresses and the promise of a new life. There are hundreds of thousands of Lennox's sitting alone and scared in the shelters of your community waiting for an act of kindness. Adopt them, or foster them for awhile. Make a place for them on your couch.

To Lennox's family -- know how many hearts and minds are with you. We are dedicated to ensuring that other families won't be destroyed as yours has been. To the people who fought so hard for Lennox, you did not fail. Your selflessness and kindness is felt and appreciated and you started an important and overdue groundswell. And to Lennox, I hope you are finally at peace, and resting in your own serene and undisturbed slumber after the stress and the fear and the cruelty. Know that there is an army of people mobilizing with those who were already on your side. We have just begun the fight, and it is one that we will win. Godspeed.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by Gob »

A slightly less histrionic report.
Lennox, an illegal pit-bull terrier type dog, has been put down, Belfast City Council has confirmed.

The dog, which was put down on Wednesday after the expiry of a midnight deadline for legal appeals, attracted a global campaign of support.

Campaigners claimed to have 200,000 signatures supporting a reprieve and emotions were running high.

Staff at Belfast City Council were targeted for intimidation by some supporters.

One Belfast councillor has received a death threat over Lennox's proposed destruction and workers in Belfast City Council have become the target of a fresh series of intimidating and threatening messages.
Some Northern Ireland vets said they had been inundated with emails from campaigners.

One leading Northern Ireland veterinary surgeon said the emails being sent to individual vets and practices were causing problems.

"No doubt those campaigners feel this is justified as a means of advancing their aims," the vet said.

"However, I have now heard of two practices where test results for critically-ill animals failed to reach the vet as their mailbox was full of Lennox letters.

"I am sure that disrupting the treatment of other animals was not the intention of the campaigners, but I am afraid that is what is happening."

Lennox was impounded by Belfast City Council's dog wardens in 2010.

In June, Northern Ireland's most senior judges rejected Caroline Barnes' legal bid to overturn an order for the destruction of her pet.

Ms Barnes, who is disabled, and her family, insisted that Lennox was not dangerous. While it was not clear exactly what breed he was, pit bulls and dogs like them are illegal in Northern Ireland and in the rest of the UK.

Two lower courts had already ruled that the dog should be put down.

The dog was seized by Belfast City Council dog wardens in May 2010. He was assessed to be a danger to the public and subsequently ordered to be put down.

A former Metropolitan Police dog handler claimed the dog represented a danger due to his unpredictability.

Ms Barnes, 35, had accepted her pet was a pit-bull type, but claimed there had been a failure to properly consider a possible exemption scheme.

Her battle for Lennox became an international campaign to save his life. It went "viral" on social media websites and attracted tens of thousands of well-wishers.

Well-known people including boxer Lennox Lewis and Northern Ireland First Minister Peter Robinson were among those who used Twitter to call for the dog to be spared.

Some of the dog's followers took the campaign to extremes and Belfast council workers became the focus of intimidation and abuse.

Last year, threatening letters, one drenched in petrol, were put through the letter-boxes of two female dog wardens. Another staff member had her car tyres slashed outside her home.


In a statement on Wednesday, the council said: "Whilst there is an exemption scheme to which dogs of this type (pit-bull terrier type) may be admitted as an alternative to destruction, there were no such measures that could be applied in this case that would address the concerns relating to public safety.

"The council's expert described the dog as one of the most unpredictable and dangerous dogs he had come across."

Belfast City Councillor Pat McCarthy said several council staff had been intimidated.

"We've had dog wardens who had to leave their homes. We've had petrol poured through letter boxes, we've had people named on the web," he said.

"There have been attempts to demonize our staff for doing their job. The dog has now been put to sleep. It was deemed a dangerous dog.

"There was a court order for the dog's destruction and we had to carry it out.

"The people looking after Lennox for the past two years said that one minute the dog was placid and friendly and the next he would try to get through the fence to get at you.


"Now do we release that dog into society? We have a duty of care to people."

Television dog training expert Victoria Stillwell had offered to have Lennox re-homed in America where he would not be in contact with the public.

She said she was "absolutely devastated" that Lennox had been put down.

"I hoped Belfast City Council would realise that there were alternatives that provided a sanctuary for Lennox in the USA where he would be safe but they did not listen," she said.

"We asked the council that the family be allowed to see the dog before it was put down - they ignored that. They won't even allow the family to see the dog's body."

The two largest Northern Ireland veterinary associations said they believed the current legislation should change.

"We feel that dogs should be assessed on their deeds rather than their breed and this is the root of the problem.

"Our associations have continually made our views known to government on the Dangerous Dogs Legislation, however, it is also important that the public is adequately protected from genuinely dangerous dogs."
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by loCAtek »

Image

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by loCAtek »

Truth shall set us Free

Lennox was taken from the Barnes family home in Belfast by dog wardens two years ago after city council officials identified him as a pit bull-type dog, which is illegal in Northern Ireland. Lennox was an American bulldog Labrador mix not a pit bull. A 28-day deadline for legal appeals expired at midnight on July 10, 2012. The dog, who never hurt anyone, never bit anyone, was a family pet, was executed for looking like a pit bull after being taken from his family two years ago. The dog's heartbroken owner, Caroline Barnes and her teenage daughter Brooke were denied the chance to say a final farewell. They were not even told that the dog was dead by the Belfast City Council who were determined to kill the dog, despite numerous other viable options to rehome the dog in the USA and italy. Now they will not return the body nor his collar to the family.




Image
We are taking comfort in the fact that Lennox is no longer in the hands of those who caused him pain... the barnes family

Northern Ireland's First Minister Peter Robinson turned to social media in a doomed, last-minute attempt at intervention.

"As a dog lover I am very unhappy with the outcome of this case," he tweeted. "Spoke to Lord Mayor about Lennox. Suggested BCC (Belfast City Council) should seriously look at re-homing option. Why exercise the order if there's an alternative?"

Victoria Stilwell

"I want to know why Belfast City council won't give Lennox's body back to the family and why they won't even return his collar to Brooke even though they were asked to do so by the family so that she could have something to remember him by. There is something corrupt going on and an independent review of the council's actions in this case needs to be done. I want answers. Why not return the body? Was Lennox even still alive and what physical condition was he in at the time of his death? We already have evidence of his poor physical state during Sarah Fisher's behavioral evaluation of him last year. Hair loss, sores on his body,a hurt neck and damaged paw. The council have many questions they need to answer because I think they have something to hide."

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by Sean »

We are taking comfort in the fact that Lennox is no longer in the hands of those who caused him pain... the barnes family
So his owners were cruel to him? ;)
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by loCAtek »

He was held in a small cell for the last two years by the BBC, with nothing but sawdust and his own feces, and allowed no visitation.


While his family loved him and did every cert, license and requirement for a disabled person's therapy dog. The law only knew of him because they were working on another warrent at another address, and mistakingly went to the wrong place.



Image
Last edited by loCAtek on Fri Jul 13, 2012 6:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by Gob »

loCAtek wrote:He was held in a small cell for the last two years by the BBC, with nothing but sawdust and his own feces, and allowed no visitation.

“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by loCAtek »

Lennox in his cell;

Image

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by Sean »

loCAtek wrote:He was held in a small cell for the last two years by the BBC, with nothing but sawdust and his own feces, and allowed no visitation.

Yes, he would've received much better treatment from ITV... ;) :lol:
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by loCAtek »

better than killing him?

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by Gob »

I hear they're making a documentary on it Sean.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by Sean »

LMAO
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by loCAtek »

You delight in cruelty to service dogs, noted.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by Gob »

It's going to be called; "Barnes Noble".

That way they get the book rights thrown in.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Sean
Posts: 5826
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Gold Coast

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by Sean »

loCAtek wrote:You delight in cruelty to service dogs, noted.
Can you back that up? Go on... I dare you!
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by loCAtek »

You're saying your LMAO is not aimed at the plight of mis-identified service dog Lennox? Thank Dog.

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by loCAtek »

Gob wrote:It's going to be called; "Barnes Noble".

That way they get the book rights thrown in.

Funny, but the dog's name was Lennox.

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by loCAtek »

Any way, to misidentify him with a German hound, I'm sure you'll find.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by Gob »

Annie can do the theme tune!
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Ban Belfast for Barnes

Post by loCAtek »

...and how will you comfort the family of the disabled daughter who lost her best friend?

Post Reply