A life-long crook who sparked outrage when he was sent on a Safari in his teens to try to stop him offending has been jailed again - after committing his 111th offence.
Criminal Mark Hook, 35, was dubbed 'Safari Boy' when he was given a three month African 'character-building' holiday in 1993.
But the 'reward' for his crime appears to have done little to control his bad behaviour and this week he was sentenced at Glouceter Crown Court to 18 months in prison.
Hook admitted mugging a frail pensioner while she did her shopping and handling property stolen from another elderly woman.
Judge Jamie Tabor QC branded Hook a 'perpetual villain' who had constantly broken promises to be an 'honest citizen'.
'We have been looking at each other across this court for many years,' he said.
'There have been many protestations from you that you are going to become an honest citizen and behave yourself. So far you haven’t.'
The judge said Hook’s latest crimes were similar to those when he was last jailed - for two years - in 2009 for mugging a frail 80 year old man in the street.
He added 'You have an appalling record. Your latest offences were planned and you acted in concert with another person. You are a perpetual villain.'
Hook sparked outrage in 1993 when he was sent by social services on an 88 day junket to Egypt and Kenya to keep him out of trouble. The teenager had made a series of appearances in youth courts and had been in a children's home in north Wales at the time.
His luxury £7,000 safari - funded by social services - caused a national outcry and was condemned in the House of Commons by Prime Minister John Major.
The idea had been to take Hook away from the area where he committed his juvenile crimes and show him places where people were worse off than him.
But it all backfired and soon after Hook’s return he started offending again - continuing on an almost non-stop crime spree which has carried on until this day.
Just months after the jaunt, Hook appeared at Gloucester Crown Court for 34 offences in January 1994 alone. They included burglary and taking a car without consent and he was given a year’s supervision order.
Three weeks later in February 1994 he was back, admitting burglary with intent and getting a further 12 months’ supervision. In July he was sentenced to six months’ youth detention for burglary and two months later was given a further nine months for handling stolen property and driving while disqualified.
The repeat offender is estimated to have cost the taxpayer around £1m over the years.
Who'd've thunk it?
Who'd've thunk it?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Who'd've thunk it?
Holy shit! I've been dreaming of a trip to Africa my whole life - all I needed to do was be a punk?!?!
Seriously, why is this guy getting only 18 months jail for his 111th offense? Maybe three strikes is too harsh, but perhaps a 10th or 20th strike policy would be useful in the UK?

Seriously, why is this guy getting only 18 months jail for his 111th offense? Maybe three strikes is too harsh, but perhaps a 10th or 20th strike policy would be useful in the UK?
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan
Re: Who'd've thunk it?
Perhaps in the UK rewarding criminals makes better sense than punishing them? On the other hand I have kown way too many people here who seem to be made of teflon while others get slamed for a minor first offense. 
I expect to go straight to hell...........at least I won't have to spend time making new friends.
Re: Who'd've thunk it?
£7,000 ($10,600 Au or $11,000 US) in 1993, how much would that be today?
Miles, the UK seems hell bent on this sort of lunacy.
Miles, the UK seems hell bent on this sort of lunacy.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Who'd've thunk it?
I blame this on the fact that they play cricket* instead of baseball over there.bigskygal wrote:Seriously, why is this guy getting only 18 months jail for his 111th offense? Maybe three strikes is too harsh, but perhaps a 10th or 20th strike policy would be useful in the UK?
*(No such thing as "three strikes and you're out" in cricket)
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
Re: Who'd've thunk it?
Man, talk about a poster boy for "habitual criminal"....
Moreover, the type of crime this charmer specializes in; mugging little old ladies, (a real man's sport, that) is almost certain to result in death or serious injury sooner or later....
At which point maybe he'll get two years....
Moreover, the type of crime this charmer specializes in; mugging little old ladies, (a real man's sport, that) is almost certain to result in death or serious injury sooner or later....
At which point maybe he'll get two years....



Re: Who'd've thunk it?
I'd like to see this little sh-t locked up in a proper US prison.
San Quentin, Corcoran, Soledad come to mind.
San Quentin, Corcoran, Soledad come to mind.
Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato

