Terror And Murder In Colorado

[Lord Jim]

Reading that post, I obviously hit the bullseye....(actually a double bullseye; you both proved my analysis of you is spot on and responded exactly as I predicted you would....)

You willingness to defame my professional competence on a public bulletin board is not only disgusting, but likely actionable. I'd suggest you STFU now, because I'm done with letting such things ride. Be warned.

LMAO

Are you really so ignorant as to honestly believe, (or even worse, do you think that I am so ignorant that you can make me believe) that my saying that what you posted made it look like you might not know that there is no insanity defense in Montana is "actionable" ?



Have you decided that now you'd like to be The Female Quaddriver BSG? (Quadette? Bride Of Quaddriver?) Because that's exactly how you are acting....

Somebody posts things that you don't want to hear so you respond by lashing out with nut job threats in a pathetic attempt to bully that person into silence?

Is that what you want to be?



And now ladies and gentlemen, The Amazing Lord Jimkin once again dons his jeweled turban and predicts....

Yet another explosion of vicious, ultra-defensive histrionics....

[Lord Jim]

Additionally, LJ, that nasty post of shite above is entirely unsupported by evidence.

And yet, you insist on continuously providing it:

Making a statement that it is clear I have SERIOUS PSYCHOLOGICAL ISSUES THAT HAVE GONE UNADDRESSED is an outrageously nasty thing for you to do, in a pathetic attempt to divert attention from your own ridiculously embarrassing behavior in this thread. If it goes unremarked by others on the board, I'll have little trouble making my decision.

(I suspect that what's up with the goodbyes and the rapid returns is that you are so psychologically needy for re-enforcement, that you write those posts just to get all the supportive follow-up comments.)

There is no evidence that I engage in frequent vitriolic attack on others on this board, or provoke/pick fights. There is no evidence that I have 'bungee cord mood swings'. There is no evidence that I engage in ultra-defensive histrionic screeds -

There's ample evidence of all of these things; (in fact there's ample evidence just in this thread)you are just so oblivious to you own negative behavior that you are incapable of seeing it.

ETA:

make the appropriate apology

Okay, you're absolutely right; Your behavior has convinced me that I do owe an apology, and so now I shall offer it:

Editec, wherever you are, from the bottom of heart, I deeply and sincerely apologize. You may be wrong about a lot of things, but you had this one pegged dead to rights.

[Lord Jim]

BTW, when exactly is it that you plan to start ignoring me?

The champagne's getting warm.....

[BoSoxGal]

I never said there was an 'insanity defense' in Montana, LJ. Not once. You are the ONLY person who used those words. You are in way over your head.

You obviously have written all this nasty hyperbolic attacking shite without even bothering to READ THE WORDS THAT I HAVE WRITTEN with regard to the law here, which I know and understand 100% better than you do from Googling a WashPo article.

And now I understand why so many posters expressed concerns about your return to CSB, when it occurred, and why editec and Steve and Gwen and others made the comments they did about you during the meltdown of the CSB.

As I stated several weeks back, you've made me your target du jour, having made friendly with Andrew D. So after years of being friendly with me on board and off, you've now in the space of a few weeks time taken a total 180 turn and accused me of being mentally unstable, denigrated me professionally and personally, etc.

Yet it's ME you claim is the whack job?

Something tells me Andrew D. wasn't so far off in his recent statements about you; the degree of honesty and fair play you exhibit here is very likely indicative of the degree of honesty and fair play you exhibit in real life.

[The Hen]

Sorry. I thought this thread was about the nutter that went berserk and started thrill killing innocent strangers at the movies.

Which brings me to another unrelated point, why were there so many children under twelve at this movie?

[insert rant about inappropriate parenting skills]

[Lord Jim]

And now ladies and gentlemen, The Amazing Lord Jimkin once again dons his jeweled turban and predicts....

Yet another explosion of vicious, ultra-defensive histrionics....

You obviously have written all this nasty hyperbolic attacking shite without even bothering to READ THE WORDS THAT I HAVE WRITTEN with regard to the law here, which I know and understand 100% better than you do from Googling a WashPo article.


And now I understand why so many posters expressed concerns about your return to CSB, when it occurred, and why editec and Steve and Gwen and others made the comments they did about you during the meltdown of the CSB.

As I stated several weeks back, you've made me your target du jour, having made friendly with Andrew D. So after years of being friendly with me on board and off, you've now in the space of a few weeks time taken a total 180 turn and accused me of being mentally unstable, denigrated me professionally and personally, etc.

Something tells me Andrew D. wasn't so far off in his recent statements about you; the degree of honesty and fair play you exhibit here is very likely indicative of the degree of honesty and fair play you exhibit in real life.

Yet it's ME you claim is the whack job?

Actually, given the evidence you're providing with your own behavior, at this point that would be kind of gratuitous....

BTW, when exactly is it that you plan to start ignoring me?

I guess the answer to that question would be, "not any time soon"....

[Lord Jim]

In case you have forgotten, this entire exchange began when you posted this, without my having pointed so much as one single word in your direction:

eta: I hadn't read your commentary, LJ, when I first posted.

Now I have, I feel compelled to comment that it's pretty damned arrogant for you to declare with such certainty the suspect's motive, when medical personnel are still treating the wounded and LE are still in the initial stages of investigation.

Talking about the death penalty at such a moment is also more than a bit reactionary.

But then I'm guessing you would execute Jared Loughner summarily, without even the pesky business of a trial.

But of course your farts smell like roses....

ETA:

You have done this sort of thing repeatedly over the past few months; dived into discussions hurling insults when no one has even addressed you. You first started with another poster, (who's tolerance level for this sort of thing must be higher than mine) and then you started in on me....

It's apparently become so second nature to you, that you don't even notice yourself doing it....

I kept hoping that whatever "issues" you were having that was causing this behavior would get taken care of, but now I'm just completely fed up.

People with glass jaws should not be throwing haymakers....

If you don't like to take shit, then you need to stop starting shit. It's just that simple. There's nothing "special" about you that gives you the right to go around insulting people out the blue and then expect no response.

[Gob]

I remember a debate I had with Editec back at the CSB, where he claimed that Seung-Hui Cho "had to be mad to do what he did." I still claim that these rampages can be done by someone entirely sane.

[Gob]

James Holmes, 24, was a former neuroscience PhD student at University of Colorado-Denver
Attended high school in San Diego, California, where his parents still live
He lived in an apartment in north of Aurora, about five miles from the cinema
Only previous brush with the law was a summons for speeding in October 2011

[Gob]

Unfortunate headline at the BBC;

US mourns Batman shooting victims

[BoSoxGal]

In case you have forgotten, this entire exchange began when you posted this, without my having pointed so much as one single word in your direction:

eta: I hadn't read your commentary, LJ, when I first posted.

Now I have, I feel compelled to comment that it's pretty damned arrogant for you to declare with such certainty the suspect's motive, when medical personnel are still treating the wounded and LE are still in the initial stages of investigation.

Talking about the death penalty at such a moment is also more than a bit reactionary.

But then I'm guessing you would execute Jared Loughner summarily, without even the pesky business of a trial.

But of course your farts smell like roses....

Right.

So my stating that in my opinion, your assertions in the OP were arrogant and reactionary - on a board where the imperative is to 'above all, ARGUE' - gives you license to respond by calling me incompetent to practice my profession, accusing me of being mentally unstable, saying I have a documented history (though without providing any specific examples) of attacking and provoking people on this board, exhibiting 'bungee cord mood swings', etc.

And the two owners of the board, who have railed endlessly about how outrageous it was for loCA to defame them (with my full support), have exactly nothing to say in response to your posts in this thread defaming me.

Lovely.

[Gob]

Give me a chance, I'm barely out of bed.

[Gob]

[Lord Jim]

So my stating that in my opinion, your assertions in the OP were arrogant and reactionary - on a board where the imperative is to 'above all, ARGUE' - gives you license to respond by calling me incompetent to practice my profession, accusing me of being mentally unstable, saying I have a documented history (though without providing any specific examples) of attacking and provoking people on this board, exhibiting 'bungee cord mood swings', etc.

Missin' a few steps there, ain't you counselor?

The only thing I said to your first round of unprovoked insults (though apparently on Planet BSG, calling someone who has directed not one word towards them an "arrogant reactionary" who would like to see somebody who had nothing to do with topic shot without a trial, isn't considered insulting) was that if you didn't like me expressing my opinions you could:



My analysis of your psychological condition (which you are busy proving to be spot on) came after many more insults....

[BoSoxGal]

Yes, I can see how you would find it terribly insulting to have yourself showed up for an arrogant fool after your sweeping declarations of legal scholarship re: the state of the criminal law in Montana and subsequent denigration of my legal acumen was utterly eviscerated by the facts and the law as they actually exist here.



The bottom line is that you have behaved as an utter ass in this thread. I disagreed with you, you got angry and after five minutes' Google searching you declared me, in writing on this public bulletin board, to be incompetent to practice criminal law as a prosecutor in Montana, based on YOU falsely attributing to ME assertions that I did not make, and then incorrectly applying to the conversation legal standards which you do not fully - or even minimally - comprehend.

[Gob]

Jordan told the paper that one girl was struck in cheek, others in stomach including a girl who looked to be around 9-years-old.

The youngest victim reported was a 6-year-old being treated at Children's Hospital Colorado, where a total of six victims were taken. Their condition wasn't known.

Dear god, I bet they'd been sneaked in as some sort of a treat.

[Lord Jim]

The bottom line is that you have behaved as an utter ass in this thread. I disagreed with you, you got angry and after five minutes' Google searching you declared me, in writing on this public bulletin board, to be incompetent to practice criminal law as a prosecutor in Montana, based on YOU falsely attributing to ME assertions that I did not make, and then incorrectly applying to the conversation legal standards which you do not fully - or even minimally - comprehend.

LMAO

That is your interpretation of what has gone on in this thread?

[Lord Jim]

If it goes unremarked by others on the board, I'll have little trouble making my decision....

And the two owners of the board, who have railed endlessly about how outrageous it was for loCA to defame them (with my full support), have exactly nothing to say in response to your posts in this thread defaming me.

You know, I've seen a lot of things on these boards over the past 16 years or so, but I believe that's a first....

I don't believe I've ever seen anyone say that if they didn't see other people rushing in to support their version of events, that they would use that as an excuse to take their ball and go home....

That's a new one....

[Joe Guy]

And the two owners of the board, who have railed endlessly about how outrageous it was for loCA to defame them (with my full support), have exactly nothing to say in response to your posts in this thread defaming me.

Lovely.

I'm not aware of a requirement that "the two owners of the board" need to mediate in situations like this.

I would prefer to see you make your case and then poll the members of this BBS for their opinion on the subject rather than rely on the "owners" to step in.

I'd also like to see this argument moved to a thread of its own.

The thread subject is much too serious & worthy of discussion to be usurped by an argument between two people.

[Lord Jim]

I'd also like to see this argument moved to a thread of its own.

The thread subject is much too serious & worthy of discussion to be usurped by an argument between two people.

I agree with you that this is a very serious topic, and that it's unfortunate that it has gone off the rails like this. I apologize for allowing myself to have been baited into participating in that.

I disagree however, that this "argument" needs it's own thread. This "argument" doesn't need anything. Absent any further provocations, for my part I'm done with it.

I would consider starting a thread devoted to this "argument" to be trolling, and I will not start one.