Now a river flowed out of Eden to water the garden; and from there it divided and became four rivers. The name of the first is Pishon; it flows around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold.[...] The name of the second river is Gihon; it flows around the whole land of Cush. The name of the third river is Tigris; it flows east of Assyria And the fourth river is the Euphrates.
"Kush" is often incorrectly translated as Ethiopia, which was also known as Cush, but in this case thought to be referring to Cossaea, a Greek name for Elam, immediately to the east of ancient Babylon, which, unlike Ethiopia, does lie within the region being described.[6]
Africa?
Middle East more likely.
All of the strains which left Africa are genetically poorer than those still in Africa.
And if Africans are suppsedly genetically superior - their shorter lifespans would bely that fact.
Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
Maybe not superior, (no genetic elitism, here) but there's firm evidence that Homo Sapiens Sapiens arose in Africa, and the migration led to mingling genes with Homo sapiens neanderthalensis;
