Lo's Inquisition

[Econoline]

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=5781&start=20#p72542

[The Hen]

Yes. And?

Apart from posting again in this thread, how does that one solitary post back up your points?

What happened after that post was posted?

Gee context does count for something, sometimes.

[Gob]

As I said earlier...


If you wish to apportion blame therefore, look at who re-started this thread, constantly aggravated further, insulted without cause or reason people in it, and maintained the "discussion", please.

[Joe Guy]

After re-reading PMSP's linked post, I'm not clear on who was the aggressor in Lo's alleged domestic violence incident.

[Gob]

Thanks for that link Econoline,

I used to feel sorry for her, but now, complete disgust. A sick little cookie that one is!. The insatiable need to manipulate the facts into what she believes to be true for the sake of being right and to create the only attention she can get, negative. There is NO excuse for her vile, rude, and condescending behaviour to the members of this forum. I was appalled by the recent remarks to the owners of a sick pet and the audacity not to own up or apologize.

I truly have to thank her for being such a manipulative bitch whose premeditated antics to provoke a fight backfired. If she hadn't failed miserably in the anger management and 'mediation', he wouldn't be the person he is today.

PMSP nailed Lo in it, deny me if you can, that Lo has done every thing PMSP said in that post HERE IN THIS VERY THREAD.

Can I remind you that Lo's behaviour here, already led to the board having to take the horrible decision to exclude her for a period.

Can I point you at the "mediation thread" requested by, and then totally abused, by Lo?

BTW, if you are now one of the many Lo has got her claws into off board, you have my every sympathy mate.

[Sean]

For fucks sake!

Okay, for those who insist on using that comment from PMSP as 'proof' of her stalking...

How many genuine stalkers have you known who publicly announced that they were stalking somebody?
Are you blind to the smilie and the LOL that come straight after that statement? Can any of you point to any other words posted by PMSP which support your stalking theory?

In that case, try this:
I have been stalking Lord Jim* on this forum and on the CSB for years now. LOL

And I did it without the smilie which I suppose makes it doubly serious. I'll expect the police banging down my door any minute now...



*apologies for using your name Jim but I know that you are sensible enough to take it the right way.

[Crackpot]

YOu sure? he doesn't know April from August.

[Joe Guy]

PMSP should have used the word 'lurking' or 'observing' - or maybe monitoring Lo's posts.

'Stalking' implies evil intent, and I don't see any evidence of that.

[Lord Jim]

*apologies for using your name Jim but I know that you are sensible enough to take it the right way.

Oh yeah? And just what the hell gave you that impression?

[Lord Jim]

Econo:

I agree, (as Joe has pointed out) that in that linked post, PMSP used some unfortunate language, (if you read further in that thread you will see that several posters...including myself....expressed misgivings about it at the time)

Frankly, I was concerned that when LoCa came back from her suspension that we were going to see a really unpleasant protracted shit fight between the two of them.

But that isn't what happened. Since that post four and a half months ago, PMSP has had very little to say on the subject; and even that has been primarily in response to accusations made by LoCa (like that she was lying about knowing her ex, lying about where she lives, etc.) she has posted not one single response in this thread, that has grown now by some six pages since Saturday night...(Including something like 50 posts by LoCa) . During the three weeks between the last post in this thread and LoCa's decision to revive it, she said nothing at all directed to or about LoCa on this board in any thread.

It is certainly true that since Saturday night LoCa has been getting something of a beat down in this thread, but she brought that entirely on her self. She revived the thread, kept it going, and has fanned the flames further with completely out of left field absurd allegations (like accusing people of saying that they didn't care about domestic abuse for example) and she has it within her power to bring an end to this any time....

All she has to do is either stop responding, or take the advice I gave her sometime back and finally say something like I suggested about 40 posts ago: "My stalker wants me to pay attention to this but I'm not going to give her the satisfaction. Whatever questions or comments about this anyone else may have, this is the last thing I will say on the subject".

If she does that, will there still be a few posts that follow it? At this point, I'm sure there will be. But if she sticks to it, the discussion will peter out fairly quickly, because without her fanning the flames, the fire will run out of oxygen in relatively short order....

Failing to do something like that certainly makes it appear that :

A. She is the one who really can't move on about this, not PMSP (Forget about the names and personalities involved. If this hypothetical is given to you: "There's a discussion going on where person A has posted more than 50 times in the past few days, and person B hasn't posted once. Which person seems to be more wrapped up in the subject?" How would you answer?)

B. She must in some way be enjoying this whole bruhaha; otherwise she would take the very simple action that would end it.

[Jarlaxle]

On a more or less serious note:

My ex got half my pension (California Community Property law) and at the time I felt screwed.

It's been a dozen years.

Now, I don't care, she has her life and I have mine.

My the good Lord bless her.

For less than that, you could probably have gotten a good hit man...

[Jarlaxle]

Easy enough to fudge: tell the bank that you think someone rifled your trash, you need to get a different account number. Presto--account was opened at a later date!

Thanks Jarlaxle, some are trying to suggest I should have done my lawyer's job, and investigated that possiblity.

After watching my uncle and a good friend go through nasty, vicious splits, I know way more than I wish I did about divorce law.

[Miles]

I don't know for certain but it does seem to me that this entire incident is between three people only two of which are posting here. Perhaps the drama could be reduced if they were permitted to fight it out without outside interference. Just saying.

[Gob]

Miles, Lo has been posting about PMSP without PMSP responding.

Lo started this thread up, again when it had been dormant for 3 weeks.

Lo accused me and Hen of supporting, and Hen of enjoying, domestic violence.

All it tales for this to stop is for Lo to shut up about it.

Lo is solely responsible.

If you are another of the poor souls she has her hooks into off board, my deepest condolences mate.

I will keep repeating this, very true, information, until Lo is held responsible for her actions. I take full responsibility for doing so.

[Miles]

Miles, Lo has been posting about PMSP without PMSP responding.

Lo started this thread up, again when it had been dormant for 3 weeks.

Lo accused me and Hen of supporting, and Hen of enjoying, domestic violence.

All it tales for this to stop is for Lo to shut up about it.

Lo is solely responsible.

If you are another of the poor souls she has her hooks into off board, my deepest condolences mate.

I will keep repeating this, very true, information, until Lo is held responsible for her actions. I take full responsibility for doing so.

I have had no interaction with anyone involved with this in any way. My concern was just for the health of the board. I was just thinking that if things could be toned down a bit the tension could be decreased. While I do not post all that often I do read and I am concerned about not only the history but the future of this community.

My current situation is tenuious as family matters are stressful. I will endevour to pay more attention to what I post as to not make uninformed opinions.

[Gob]

Hey Miles, that's very fair and decent of you, though I expected no less.

Best of luck with the family matter mate!

[Miles]

Thanks My friend.

[Lord Jim]

All the best Miles.

[loCAtek]

Very well, interesting the denial that they haven't heard anything, when I still have the emails dating back from 2004. Roughly, starting with;

From: loCAtek Mexicali
To: [Taff & Hen]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 3:25 PM
Subject: Living the vida Loca!


Hiya,

How have you folks been? I hope you'll be having a relaxing weekend. I 'm sending out a quick note, but having a nice e-chat would be better sometime nice ...
This all has to do the divorce; if I could tell you half the tricks he's put me through ... The thing is - I suspect he's going to declare our breakup was MY fault ...

Cool, I'm psychic!

If you can't find that, Gob/Hen you should really run a search for an e-mail entitled X-games, sent in 2010;

Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2010 7:19 AM

Subject: X-games

I can re-send it to you, if you like? It was quite comprehensive of the offline situation. A few other folks have seen it, and can verify its authenticity; I didn't just send it to one person, that would be putting all my eggs in one basket.

[Gob]

Econoline, Miles, see what I mean?