It looks pretty straight forward to me...Jury in BART case goes home for day, police prepare for unrest
LOS ANGELES — Police in Oakland underwent crowd-control training and were put on 12-hour shifts as they awaited a verdict in the shooting death of an unarmed black man by a white former transit officer who claimed he mistakenly drew his gun instead of his Taser.
A jury in Los Angeles ended its first day of deliberations Friday without reaching a verdict in the case against Johannes Mehserle. The panel will return Tuesday.
Mehserle, 28, has pleaded not guilty to murder in the shooting of 22-year-old Oscar Grant after a fight drew officers to the Fruitvale train station on New Year's Day 2009. Grant was shot while lying face down on the platform.
Several bystanders videotaped the New Year's Day 2009 incident — perhaps the most racially polarizing trial in California since four Los Angeles police officers were acquitted in 1992 in the Rodney King beating case.
In his closing argument, Alameda County Deputy District Attorney David Stein said police officers are supposed to protect and serve, not abuse their authority.
"We also entrust them with our lives and our fellow citizens," Stein said. "Oscar Grant represents one of those citizens."
Defense attorney Michael Rains contended the shooting was a tragic accident. He cited testimony that his client had inadequate training to prevent weapons confusion and witnesses who said Mehserle appeared to be in shock after shooting Grant.
"On Jan. 1, 2009, Johannes Mehserle fired a single gunshot and it brought him to this place before you, and you are his shot at justice," Rains told jurors, citing a line from the 1982 legal drama "The Verdict," starring Paul Newman.
In Oakland, police braced to prevent a repeat of the rioting that occurred after people first saw the grainy videos of the shooting.
A statement released Friday said the department had taken precautions, including shifting resources and identifying mutual aid options.
"We anticipate protests following the reading of the verdict and have heard of possible outside agitation in an attempt to turn the peaceful movement into acts of civil unrest," the statement said.
In Los Angeles, already tight security around the courthouse will be beefed up on verdict day.
"We have taken all precautions," county sheriff's spokesman Steve Whitmore said. "You will see a large number of deputy sheriffs, significantly more than before, and there will be stuff you won't see."
Mehserle resigned from the Bay Area Rapid Transit agency after the shooting. His trial was moved from Alameda County to Los Angeles because of excessive media coverage and racial tensions.
Another officer was heard on video uttering a slur before the shooting, but no evidence was presented during the trial that Mehserle's actions were influenced by prejudice.
Jurors must decide if Mehserle should be acquitted or found guilty of second-degree murder or a lesser offenses of voluntary or involuntary manslaughter.
The incident sent Oakland into a tailspin as violent street protests intensified the debate on whether Mehserle knowingly shot Grant, a young father from Hayward, Calif., who had been recently released from jail.
He became a martyr of sorts. His omnipresent image on buildings and storefront windows across Oakland arguably rivals that of slain hometown rapper Tupac Shakur.
_
AP Writer Terry Collins in San Francisco contributed to this report.
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/natio ... z0t0X9yzo7
I have a difficult time imagining how one could mistake a taser gun for a service revolver...I've had occasion to hold both the type of taser that Mehserle had and a gun similar to the one he had with him, (One of Lady Kelly's cousins is married to a cop) and it's pretty much inconceivable to me that anyone could mistake one for the other... that would seem like a huge hurdle to get over in front of a jury)
But we're now into day three of deliberations which suggests that there may be some folks on the jury that don't see it that way....
Given what happened when this case first became public, I think that concerns about violence in Oakland (and Los Angeles, where the case is being tried) are well founded.
If there is a "not guilty" or even a hung jury result in this case, I would not want to be in East Bay after the sun goes down.
up all manner of sh-t. Oftern the sh-t that they