Tit job
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21185
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Tit job

Aerial view of Serena Williams' equipment malfunction during training run
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Tit job
Yes, you...we need pictures of the "chicks who can spin their tassels in opposite directions" you mentioned!loCAtek wrote:What? Me?
Treat Gaza like Carthage.
Re: Tit job
I'm going to knock my swede's socks off this weekend....
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
Re: Tit job
Older women may need specially designed sports bras because their breasts don’t bounce like younger women.
Experts at the University of Portsmouth found that older women are less likely to experience vertical breast bounce during exercise.
The study, the first to look at breast movement in women aged 45 to 65, also found older women’s breasts move in a different way to younger women’s.
The research was carried out by Debbie Risius, of the Research Group in Breast Health, and involved 24 women.
Twelve participants aged between 45 and 65 years were compared with twelve women aged between 18 and 25 years - all had a cup size of 34D.
The research team looked at movement in the breast when subjects walked bare breasted on a treadmill for two minutes.
Miss Risius initially thought older women would experience more breast movement, and breast pain, as a result of exercising, than younger women.
However, the study actually found that older women experience less movement than younger women.
Miss Risius suggested this is due to older breast tissue being less elastic, and therefore having less bounce than younger tissue.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... z27R0WNoKy
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: Tit job
I think they were just out to look at tits
Okay... There's all kinds of things wrong with what you just said.
Re: Tit job
Did no one, other than me, pay any attention to the National Geographic shows?
Of COURSE older breasts have less bounce.
Have people learnt nothing?
Edited to remove the errant p in a word. Damn these pads of eye.
Of COURSE older breasts have less bounce.
Have people learnt nothing?
Edited to remove the errant p in a word. Damn these pads of eye.
Last edited by The Hen on Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Bah!


Re: Tit job
I learnt it was 'Geographic', and those breasts weren't much older, just supportless.
Re: Tit job

So the sixty year old breasts I was talking about weren't much older?
Neither are the seventy year old breasts.
However, they still do not bounce up and down as much as they age regardless of support.
Bah!


Re: Tit job
Nat Geo Breasts were usually under 60 ...or could you be specific as to which documentary?
Re: Tit job
No, I can't.
It was about the care of tribal elders and I saw it about 30 years ago.
You can look it up if you are that interested in older unsupported bosoms.
It was about the care of tribal elders and I saw it about 30 years ago.
You can look it up if you are that interested in older unsupported bosoms.
Bah!


Re: Tit job
Or you could link to it, since that was your point.
Most of the time Nat Geo publishes this sort of thing;

Spot the sixty-year-old, 'kay?
Most of the time Nat Geo publishes this sort of thing;

Spot the sixty-year-old, 'kay?
Re: Tit job
No Lo, I won't link to it.
My point has been made and I am satisfied with the information I have provided.
If you have an issue with what I have stated, the provide your point.
Many thanks for your interest in what programs I viewed 30 years ago.
My point has been made and I am satisfied with the information I have provided.
If you have an issue with what I have stated, the provide your point.
Many thanks for your interest in what programs I viewed 30 years ago.
Bah!


Re: Tit job
Been a subscriber to the magazine since I was a pup. No issue, I just have more experience than what you get from television; if you have no interest in further education, than so be it. I'll let you be.
Re: Tit job
I doubt I could learn much from you Lo.
You see, my youth was spent living amongst New Guinea highland tribes with my father who made documentaries for a number of film companies. (BBC, Sottish Television, ABC and a number of Commonwealth Departments.)
My hands on experience reinforces the documentaries I have viewed and watched my father make.
You see, my youth was spent living amongst New Guinea highland tribes with my father who made documentaries for a number of film companies. (BBC, Sottish Television, ABC and a number of Commonwealth Departments.)
My hands on experience reinforces the documentaries I have viewed and watched my father make.
Bah!


- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21185
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Tit job
The Hen wrote: Sottish Television

For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Tit job
No. My parents lived in Sotland for a period of time, just before they moved to Walls.
They even got their own Sottish Tart tin.
They even got their own Sottish Tart tin.
Bah!


Re: Tit job
Sottish walls? Have you tried oxiclean?
Or: should I believe you, as well as you believe me?
Or: should I believe you, as well as you believe me?

- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21185
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Tit job
Fixed that for you loCA.loCAtek wrote:Sottish walls? Have you tried oxiclean?
Or: should I believe you, as well as you believe me?

Meade
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts