Political maths

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Political maths

Post by Gob »

MajGenl.Meade wrote: As to the flag - the word "Meade" followed by "Bullshit" should be a fairly clear communication I would have thought. :lol:

Surely that's a tautology? :nana
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21464
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Political maths

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Well it used to be taut but you know, gravity and all that. (Not that I necessarily concur with gravity)
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Political maths

Post by Lord Jim »

Surely that's a tautology?
Actually, I believe the word you're looking for there is "redundancy".... :P
ImageImageImage

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21464
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Political maths

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Oddly in South Africa that's called "redeployed". I.E. today a job; tomorrow no job. Weird
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Political maths

Post by rubato »

Gob wrote:
Could it be that Labour leader Ed Miliband's demand that all school pupils must study maths until they are 18 has been prompted by new evidence that his own MPs struggle with numbers?



The man in charge of the party's policy review, Jon Cruddas, admitted this weekend that he is "barely numerate". And when the Royal Statistical Society (RSS) recently tested the ability of honourable members to answer a relatively simple mathematical question, only a quarter of Labour MPs got it right.

A total of 97 MPs were asked this probability problem: if you spin a coin twice, what is the probability of getting two heads?*

Among Conservative members, 47% gave the wrong answer, which is disappointing enough. But of the 44 Labour MPs who took part, 77% answered incorrectly.


(*The correct response, of course, is 25%.)

Wow, that's really disappointing.

One of the most important questions when dealing with probabilistic outcomes is knowing that if the events are truly random the outcome of the first coin toss has no effect on the second.

Although the mis-perception is very common that if a flipped coin comes up heads 2, 3, 4, or 5 times in a row that the probability changes that the next one will be tails. ( a fact put to very rich use by casinos everywhere).


yrs,
rubato

Andrew D
Posts: 3150
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:01 pm
Location: North California

Re: Political maths

Post by Andrew D »

I just flipped a coin. I don't know whether it landed heads or tails. What are the odds that it landed heads?
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: Political maths

Post by Econoline »

50%

I just flipped another coin. What are the odds that that one landed heads?

Right!

So now.....what are the odds that both Andrew's coin and my coin landed heads?
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Political maths

Post by Gob »

An orange one.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 9101
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Political maths

Post by Sue U »

Will this tell us whether that poor cat in the box is still alive?
GAH!

Big RR
Posts: 14907
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Political maths

Post by Big RR »

The cat is both alive and dead until you open the box. Of course you have to open it at least nine times to be sure it is finally dead. :D

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21464
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Political maths

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

So the first time, there's only an 11.1r chance that it's dead?
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

Post Reply