BSG's "Complaints"....
Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
False accusations laughed off, Hen. Just as Gob described his experience with his employer.
But you two do love to be the center of drama. Been that way since the first cat fight of yours, with Gwen, that I registered into on the CSB back in 2005. Remember? Autistic kid in a movie theatre - turned into the biggest issue ever.
I don't support loCA in this, and I had your back and Gob's in the whole situation way before most here - the record is clear on that. In our PMs, too. How'd you return the loyalty?
So nice of you to pile right on with the bitch routine. Have at it. You reap what you sow. Ta!
But you two do love to be the center of drama. Been that way since the first cat fight of yours, with Gwen, that I registered into on the CSB back in 2005. Remember? Autistic kid in a movie theatre - turned into the biggest issue ever.
I don't support loCA in this, and I had your back and Gob's in the whole situation way before most here - the record is clear on that. In our PMs, too. How'd you return the loyalty?
So nice of you to pile right on with the bitch routine. Have at it. You reap what you sow. Ta!
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
~ Carl Sagan
Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
BSG... That last part of your post could've been written by lo...
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?
Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
You have no ability to read between the lines. How surprising.bigskygal wrote:False accusations laughed off, Hen. Just as Gob described his experience with his employer.
And?But you two do love to be the center of drama. Been that way since the first cat fight of yours, with Gwen, that I registered into on the CSB back in 2005. Remember? Autistic kid in a movie theatre - turned into the biggest issue ever.
I had a particularly dog in that fight. A very autistic brother. With extreme spastication. I have seen the complete disgust that brings to people. I have witnessed the discrimination and attitudes that were displayed in that thread. I am a supporter of the Autistic Foundation. Of course I was going to point out prejudices.
How interesting you don't remember that part.
I had not read the fucking thread.I don't support loCA in this, and I had your back and Gob's in the whole situation way before most here - the record is clear on that. In our PMs, too. How'd you return the loyalty?
I did not want to enter into an argument.
I was following your prophet advice and not getting involved. You are now castigating me for doing what you just wanted everyone to do.
Not only that, but there was a complaint hanging over Gob;s head and you think I really wanted to get into more arguments?
You are calling ME a drama queen?
You misread my words. How surprising.So nice of you to pile right on with the bitch routine. Have at it. You reap what you sow. Ta!
You do reap what you sow. I am having a great life. I have no issues with anything other than a vexatious malicious poster lodging a false complaint about my husband.
I am going towards ridding myself of that stalker.
So, please go.
I want everyone that doesn't want to be here to leave. This is a voluntary forum.
Go.
Bah!


Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
The key to understanding where BSG is coming from, (and the explanation for the complete disconnect between her actual words and attitude at the time re LoCa and the situation with Quad, and the imaginative fables she wove about them this week in the banning thread) is to understand that BSG's perception of reality proceeds entirely from her "I'm the center of the universe; everything revolves around me, and I can do no wrong" perspective...
In her mind, this place instantly went from "the successful place you two created" to a place populated by folks who, "thrive on toxicity" the day legions of posters didn't jump in to denounce me for a fight she had started. (a fight which was the culmination of several months of unprovoked sniping she had engaged in going back to May...at first I couldn't figure out why she all of a sudden decided to start picking fights with me....I now think it was probably because I decided to bury the hatchet with Andrew...I believe that really pissed her off...with BSG, everything is personal)
It never occured to her to stop to think that maybe the reason that didn't happen as she arrogantly demanded it should, had anything to do with her own behavior...
Nay nay...that couldn't be the reason....she is always the blameless, noble heroine, who despite being done wrong bravely perseveres....
If people aren't rushing in to defend her, it must be because they "thrive on toxicity" or because the other poster is "better liked" than she is, or because they "need targets" or because of some other moral or ethical failing on their part....
If Joe criticizes her, then he goes from dealing in a justified way with a guy who was claiming to misuse access to private government information, to being a person no different from one filing bogus complaints against another board member's employer with no justification whatsoever....If @W criticizes her, then of course, the problem must be that BSG "vastly over-estimated her".... and so on and so on...
The problem can never lie with her and her own behavior. No, not a bit of it. That is quite impossible. BSG never once stops to think, "you know, if more and more people are criticizing me, and they're not coming to my defense, maybe there's something about the way I'm acting that could be bringing this on."
The ability to conduct that sort of self-examination is simply not in her tool box....
It's always somebody elses fault....
In her mind, this place instantly went from "the successful place you two created" to a place populated by folks who, "thrive on toxicity" the day legions of posters didn't jump in to denounce me for a fight she had started. (a fight which was the culmination of several months of unprovoked sniping she had engaged in going back to May...at first I couldn't figure out why she all of a sudden decided to start picking fights with me....I now think it was probably because I decided to bury the hatchet with Andrew...I believe that really pissed her off...with BSG, everything is personal)
It never occured to her to stop to think that maybe the reason that didn't happen as she arrogantly demanded it should, had anything to do with her own behavior...
Nay nay...that couldn't be the reason....she is always the blameless, noble heroine, who despite being done wrong bravely perseveres....
If people aren't rushing in to defend her, it must be because they "thrive on toxicity" or because the other poster is "better liked" than she is, or because they "need targets" or because of some other moral or ethical failing on their part....
If Joe criticizes her, then he goes from dealing in a justified way with a guy who was claiming to misuse access to private government information, to being a person no different from one filing bogus complaints against another board member's employer with no justification whatsoever....If @W criticizes her, then of course, the problem must be that BSG "vastly over-estimated her".... and so on and so on...
The problem can never lie with her and her own behavior. No, not a bit of it. That is quite impossible. BSG never once stops to think, "you know, if more and more people are criticizing me, and they're not coming to my defense, maybe there's something about the way I'm acting that could be bringing this on."
The ability to conduct that sort of self-examination is simply not in her tool box....
It's always somebody elses fault....
Last edited by Lord Jim on Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:13 am, edited 3 times in total.



- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21185
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
I'm not sure that's exactly the point I was making BSG. I prefer you to come back, vote whichever way you like and stay here. If anything, my post intended to query Daisy as to why the Embassy gatekeeper would allow an "I'm only here to vote" temporary return; she unerstood the laboured analogy and answered that by advising that she was not re-deactivating any poster. And here you are.Yes, Meade, after posting here for all but three months of the place's existence and supporting it financially, I shouldn't have the right to vote. Oh, unless I'd come back gunning for loCA. Then it would be fine and the question would not have been raised. I'd have been welcomed back with open arms & huzzahs if I'd but agreed with the right folks.
My own position is that there's an awful lot of spite on this board, intemperate language and petty name-calling (and that's just me

Your question over the disparate handling of the Quad thing and the Loca thing has been asked and answered. A pity that it could not be done without the seemingly endless nyanyanya and abuse from both sides of the non-argument. I believe you are factually wrong in that comparison but understand it to a degree. But I see that the witch-hunt against BSG is just getting fired up.
It all goes to show that those who live in glass houses.... LJ was right. You shouldn't accuse others of piling on to Loca when you did post some of the most awful things to and about her
IMO
Meade
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
In fact it was most eloquently and clearly explained by the poster who wrote this, directed to Quad:Your question over the disparate handling of the Quad thing and the Loca thing has been asked and answered.
That sums it up quite well...I simply preserved your written threats toward Joe Guy, in which you clearly intimated use of your access to federal resources as a federal employee to gather information about him, and offered to be of assistance should anything come of your potentially illegal behavior.



Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
Ahh, that famous "British understatement"....You're being a tad dramatic there BSG...
Ya gotta love it....




Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
Just for the record, (and seeing as you raised it BSG,) the reason I did not "have your back" in the dispute with Jim, is that you were totally responsible creating what happened there. You were in the wrong. That's how I choose whose back to have, I tend to support whoever was in the right in any conflict.
I'm funny like that.
For you to demand that I support you, just due to your supporting me against Lo’s shit throwing, (for which you still have my thanks,) doesn’t cut the mustard, I would not have been morally able to do so. I also complied with all your requests I received in your e-mail to me, did I not? So for you to come back and show such a vast range of hypocrisy, and to blame others for not supporting you, is just too rich for my palate I’m afraid.
Your posts, since your return, have set the bar at a new high for hypocritical drama queen posturing.
I'm funny like that.
For you to demand that I support you, just due to your supporting me against Lo’s shit throwing, (for which you still have my thanks,) doesn’t cut the mustard, I would not have been morally able to do so. I also complied with all your requests I received in your e-mail to me, did I not? So for you to come back and show such a vast range of hypocrisy, and to blame others for not supporting you, is just too rich for my palate I’m afraid.
Your posts, since your return, have set the bar at a new high for hypocritical drama queen posturing.
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
I beg to differ Meade. As I said before, BSG came back here all fired up and accusing various people of various things. People responded to that. I can't see how that can be classed as a witch hunt.MajGenl.Meade wrote: But I see that the witch-hunt against BSG is just getting fired up.
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?
Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
Personally, I think considering we were aware for, and had to endure, some months of knowing about this, we had been quite restrained (under the circumstances).
To say I was only a few seconds away from being combustible (at times) would be an understatement. To consider joining anyone else's fight, was inconceivable. Contrary to sarcasm posted, this was not a laughing matter, but a serious one.
Re-read my posts with the hindsight of my situation I think I was very restrained in my dealings with Lo. Surely in my situation, jumping into another's issue would probably NOT be a good idea for my sanity, or Gob's complaint.
To say I was only a few seconds away from being combustible (at times) would be an understatement. To consider joining anyone else's fight, was inconceivable. Contrary to sarcasm posted, this was not a laughing matter, but a serious one.
Re-read my posts with the hindsight of my situation I think I was very restrained in my dealings with Lo. Surely in my situation, jumping into another's issue would probably NOT be a good idea for my sanity, or Gob's complaint.
Bah!


Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
And likewise, with hindsight, please re-read my apology.
The Hen wrote:As one of the people that BSG feels aggrieved about enough to withdraw her membership over my lack of public support, I must state that there were a number of reasons why I did not.
1. I was unaware of the past history between BSG and Lord Jim that had made her place him on ignore. This was the first time I was conscious of any major on-going issue between either of them. I do not step blindly into such a situation without the knowledge of how we arrived there in the first place. I still haven't bothered researching their past issues.
2. My issues with Lo had gone on for about a year or so. Most of the time I was on my own. Most of the advice was to ignore it. Hell, things have only just started to return to what one can loosely describe as a reasonable posting situation. Call me battle weary.
3. We are fast approaching a local election here. I am busier than the proverbial one legged man in the arse kicking competition.
4. I did not ask BSG to jump in to my situation. I do not believe I have ever requested anyone's intervention.
5. I get very emotional about killing sprees. I hate and despise the scum that commit them. I happened to agree with Lord Jim's thoughts on the matter as I couldn't see a reason for not killing himself? I still can't? Cowardice?
6. When I saw the deterioration in the thread, I didnt bother reading the posts.
I realize BSG's is going through one of life's many challenges, changing employment ... and everything else. Not only that but she has had to care for, and nurse to health, Little (Red) Bear. I should have offered my thoughts and support to her if not here, than in private.
For that, I apologise ... if she is reading.
Last edited by The Hen on Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:52 am, edited 2 times in total.
Bah!


Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
And anyone who follows the link Hen posted will see that in this discussion where BSG was outraged that people didn't rush to defend her, (and where she delusionally likens my behavior to that of a person who chased trolled and tormented two people all over the board for two years) she had without anything being addressed to her by me whatsoever, already:
called me "arrogant" (for expressing an opinion about James Holmes' motive) "reactionary", accused me of wanting to have somebody who had nothing to do with the case executed without a trial, accused me of "wallowing in self-righteousness", and informed me that she thanks "God for holding a different worldview than you and your ilk"
ALL before I finally threw my first counter punch....
Which one of us "witch hunters" held a gun to her head and made her type the insulting, nonsensical garbage she posted in the banning thread?
We didn't have to do any "hunting"....
She flew in on her own and started stirring her caldron....
called me "arrogant" (for expressing an opinion about James Holmes' motive) "reactionary", accused me of wanting to have somebody who had nothing to do with the case executed without a trial, accused me of "wallowing in self-righteousness", and informed me that she thanks "God for holding a different worldview than you and your ilk"
ALL before I finally threw my first counter punch....
Good lord, what utter rubbish....But I see that the witch-hunt against BSG is just getting fired up.

Which one of us "witch hunters" held a gun to her head and made her type the insulting, nonsensical garbage she posted in the banning thread?
We didn't have to do any "hunting"....
She flew in on her own and started stirring her caldron....



Re: BSG's "Complaints"....

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer-
Arthur Schopenhauer-
Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
That started here:I was unaware of the past history between BSG and Lord Jim that had made her place him on ignore.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6193&p=76189&hilit=dramamine#p76189
Where you can see the pattern is almost exactly the same as in the latter thread; She attacks and insults me out of the blue with no provocation, I try to avoid getting into it with her, she keeps on with it till I finally get fed up, and then she plays the wounded victim...
Between those two threads, on numerous occasions she engaged in LoCa like behavior, following up numerous posts of mine with unprovoked, snarky, sneering, condescending, insults. The reason Hen, and many others, weren't aware of the problem was because for the most part I didn't respond to her crap, so it didn't result in a lot of back and forth.
I had long recognized that she had some psychological problems; but I believed that she was basically a good hearted and well meaning person, and I kept hoping that whatever it was that had gotten her to decide to keep coming at me would eventually resolve itself. For this reason, I granted a lot more patience to her, given the way she was behaving, than I have to some other folks. By the time she pulled the same crap yet again in the James Holmes thread, she had completely exhausted the considerable patience and forbearance I had extended to her.
Last edited by Lord Jim on Sun Oct 14, 2012 1:59 am, edited 1 time in total.



Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
I should have been more concise. Per BSG's accusations... What I meant to say is that the Plan B provides much too many brooms for those so inclined to fly about enjoying themselves at the expense of others whilst all the while claiming innocence in matters that point a spotlight upon their own glaring hypocrisy.
BSG? Make good on your threat. Go. And don't let the door hit your fat ass on the way out.
I spent 2 hours typing a logical and coherent response in the 'Ban Loca' Thread only to have it eaten by the ether. Fuck that!
And Fuck you. Go lay by your dish. You fucking self important piece of self absorbed, condescending cunt.
Jim nailed you to the wall! And I find it very enlightening to know that someone that you esteem as your intellectual inferior and not worth your time debating that you would place such credence upon discrediting his opinion... Hmmm Deal with it. You and Loca are flip sides to the same coin.
I have been sickened by the ongoing drama for more time than I care to admit.
So much so that I cannot even involve myself in your "NON-Drama" placebo bullshit. *Spit!*
Except to briefly interject this:
You are really precious in your assumption that you are Lilly white. But May I suggest that you just fuck off. Truly. Fuck the hell off. And find another more comfortable nest to shit in as you so sanctimoniously hinted at.
Thank you in advance.
Timster

BSG? Make good on your threat. Go. And don't let the door hit your fat ass on the way out.
I spent 2 hours typing a logical and coherent response in the 'Ban Loca' Thread only to have it eaten by the ether. Fuck that!
And Fuck you. Go lay by your dish. You fucking self important piece of self absorbed, condescending cunt.
Jim nailed you to the wall! And I find it very enlightening to know that someone that you esteem as your intellectual inferior and not worth your time debating that you would place such credence upon discrediting his opinion... Hmmm Deal with it. You and Loca are flip sides to the same coin.
I have been sickened by the ongoing drama for more time than I care to admit.
So much so that I cannot even involve myself in your "NON-Drama" placebo bullshit. *Spit!*
Except to briefly interject this:
You are really precious in your assumption that you are Lilly white. But May I suggest that you just fuck off. Truly. Fuck the hell off. And find another more comfortable nest to shit in as you so sanctimoniously hinted at.
Thank you in advance.
Timster



All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer-
Arthur Schopenhauer-
Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
Intemperate language, whatever could he mean? 

Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
Oh and the troll is dead, long live the troll.
Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
Indeed. I rest my fucking case. 

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer-
Arthur Schopenhauer-
Re: BSG's "Complaints"....
However, IF someone were to break their solemn oath... I would be more than happy to elaborate upon my already lowered opinion with more facts ...
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer-
Arthur Schopenhauer-