So because he has money he doesn't have the same first amendment rights as you and I, to say what he thinks?oldr_n_wsr wrote:Oh yeah, he put himself "out there". If you think his "bottom line" took any kind of hit for his political stance, you overestimate is presuasiveness, and so does he.Guinevere wrote:And actually, Springsteen lost fans for taking such a definite political stance last go-round. So good for him for continuing to put himself out there!
I don't look to rock stars for what/who I should vote for. I look to them for some music. Thier political veiws persuade me not one bit and even if I oppose their views, it will not persuade me to not listen to thier music. Likewise with film stars. Shut your mouth and compose music or act. If you want into politics then take the leap. It takes a lot of money, but then again, you already have that.but oh wait, I might have to spend my own?
I never said his views persuaded me, of course they don't, my political views were formed well before Bruce decided to become an activist, but I appreciate his view of the world and his willingness to stand up for what he believes in.



