Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
Post Reply
User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by dales »

:ok :ok :ok

US deploys aircraft carrier to South Korea
By ANNE FLAHERTY, Associated Press Writer


Monday, July 19, 2010

(07-19) 10:13 PDT l d WASHINGTON, (AP) --

The U.S. is sending the massive aircraft carrier the USS George Washington to South Korea this week, the military announced Monday.

The deployment is considered a show of force in the wake of the sinking of a South Korean warship last March that killed 46 sailors. South Korea and an international team of investigators have blamed North Korea for the attack.

The carrier was expected to be in South Korea's port of Busan by Wednesday and could participate in an upcoming military exercise.

The nuclear powered carrier, one of the world's largest warships, will be accompanied by three destroyers — the McCampbell, the John S. McCain and the Lassen.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton were expected to announce more details this week about the upcoming joint military exercise. Gates and Clinton were visiting Seoul to meet with their South Korean counterparts.

The military exercise and deployment of the George Washington has been under discussion since shortly after the March attack on the South Korean navy vessel, the Cheonan.

The Cheonan's sinking was considered South Korea's worst military disaster since the Korean War , which ended in a cease-fire in 1953. No formal peace treaty was ever signed, and more than 28,000 U.S. troops remain stationed in the south with a vow to protect its critical ally.

The deployment of the aircraft carrier could be seen by North Korea as a particularly aggressive move by the United States because of the ship's sheer size. According to a Navy website, the George Washington is 244 feet high from keel to mast and can accommodate some 6,250 crew members.
:ok :ok :ok

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by Lord Jim »

The deployment of the aircraft carrier could be seen by North Korea as a particularly aggressive move by the United States because of the ship's sheer size. According to a Navy website, the George Washington is 244 feet high from keel to mast and can accommodate some 6,250 crew members
Yes, and George is probably not traveling alone:
CSG or CVBG normally consist of 1 Aircraft Carrier, 2 Guided Missile Cruisers, 2 Anti Aircraft Warships,and 1-2 Anti Submarine Destroyers or Frigates.[1]

Image
Image
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier_battle_group
And an assortment of submarines.....
Last edited by Lord Jim on Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Sue U
Posts: 8905
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Location: Eastern Megalopolis, North America (Midtown)

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by Sue U »

The George Washington is not nuclear-armed. It has a Westinghouse nuclear propulsion system, which means only that it will virtually never need refueling.

It is big, however, and can carry a lot of aircraft and crew.
GAH!

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by loCAtek »

The official term is 'Forward Presence' ...and we do it all the time.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by Lord Jim »

A Nimitz Class Carrier Task Force Group brings an impressive array of weaponry to the party...

In addition to the fire power on the ships that accompany it, the carrier itself comes equipped with a full squadron of F-18's...

And a compliment of 5000 well trained heavily armed marines that can be landed any where, any time.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Rick
Posts: 3875
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:12 am
Location: Arkansas

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by Rick »

Sue U wrote:The George Washington is not nuclear-armed. It has a Westinghouse nuclear propulsion system, which means only that it will virtually never need refueling.

It is big, however, and can carry a lot of aircraft and crew.
Believe me there are NUKEs onboard.

I'm not talking about power plants...
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by Lord Jim »

Any one of these Task Force Groups could militarily defeat the armed forces of 90% of the countries on the planet today....

And we have ten of them, on active duty...

Now, who was it that "rules the waves" again? 8-)
ImageImageImage

Big RR
Posts: 14600
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:47 pm

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by Big RR »

You know, I can think of a lot of presidents who should have been impeached, from LBJ on, for not deploying these to defeat the armed forces of the puny countries we were "at war" with; indeed, with the exception of Gulf War 1, I can't think of a "war" since WW2 we have won (I don't count the battle of Grenada as a war), achieving our objectives and bringing our soldiers home. Would that it were that simple.

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by Lord Jim »

You know, I can think of a lot of presidents who should have been impeached, from LBJ on, for not deploying these to defeat the armed forces of the puny countries we were "at war" with;
I said "militarily" Big RR...

Not politically....

Whole nuther kettle of fish...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by Lord Jim »

A Nimitz Class Carrier Task Force Group brings an impressive array of weaponry to the party...

In addition to the fire power on the ships that accompany it, the carrier itself comes equipped with a full squadron of F-18's...

And a compliment of 5000 well trained heavily armed marines that can be landed any where, any time.
Oh, and I believe I forgot to mention the cruise missiles...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by Gob »

Biggest bully in the playground eh Jim? ;)
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by Lord Jim »

Biggest bully in the playground eh Jim?
More like "the cop on the beat" Strop... 8-)

One thing that always amuses me is when folks say:

"We can't be the world's policeman"

My response to that is....

Why not?

The world needs a policeman...

The world is full of drunken countries , burglar countries, and second story men countries...countries that will smack you upside the head and steal your wallet....

Somebody needs to make the world do Sunday to Monday....

The Brits used to be "the world's policemen"....

But they no longer have the resources, so its fallen to us...

It's a big job, but somebody's got to do it.... 8-)
Last edited by Lord Jim on Sat Oct 29, 2011 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by dales »

:ok :ok :ok

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by loCAtek »

Lord Jim wrote:
A Nimitz Class Carrier Task Force Group brings an impressive array of weaponry to the party...

In addition to the fire power on the ships that accompany it, the carrier itself comes equipped with a full squadron of F-18's...

And a compliment of 5000 well trained heavily armed marines that can be landed any where, any time.
Oh, and I believe I forgot to mention the cruise missiles...
...and the Harriers!

User avatar
Rick
Posts: 3875
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:12 am
Location: Arkansas

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by Rick »

No Harrier on a carrier...
Sometimes it seems as though one has to cross the line just to figger out where it is

User avatar
loCAtek
Posts: 8421
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Location: My San Ho'metown

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by loCAtek »

loCAtek wrote:The official term is 'Forward Presence' ...and we do it all the time.
In Naval History, the first such mission was;
The Great White Fleet was the popular nickname for the United States Navy battle fleet that completed a circumnavigation of the globe from 16 December 1907 to 22 February 1909 by order of U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt. It consisted of 16 battleships divided into four squadrons, along with various escorts. Roosevelt sought to demonstrate growing American military power and blue-water navy capability.
The first fleet to be lead by an Aircraft Carrier was;
Aug. 6 - Oct. 4, 1946 - USS Franklin D. Roosevelt (CVB 42) deploys to the Mediterranean Sea. The carrier makes a port visit at Athens, reemphasizing U.S. support of the pro-Western Greek government, involved in a civil war against Communist insurgents. This was the earliest example of forward presence.

liberty
Posts: 4616
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: Colonial Possession

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by liberty »

Lord Jim wrote:A Nimitz Class Carrier Task Force Group brings an impressive array of weaponry to the party...

In addition to the fire power on the ships that accompany it, the carrier itself comes equipped with a full squadron of F-18's...

And a compliment of 5000 well trained heavily armed marines that can be landed any where, any time.

I love you Jim, but I have to disagree. It doesn’t matter how big a taskforce is or how many troops or plans it has. A carrier on the bottom of the ocean can’t launch aircraft and five thousand troops, even highly discipline and trained marines, are not that many. In war, there are no certainties.

Look at a map of North Korea and it’s military and then tell me if is a nut you want to try to crack. It would be possible if we had the same power and we were not the United States.
I expected to be placed in an air force combat position such as security police, forward air control, pararescue or E.O.D. I would have liked dog handler. I had heard about the dog Nemo and was highly impressed. “SFB” is sad I didn’t end up in E.O.D.

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by dales »

:eh

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

liberty
Posts: 4616
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:31 pm
Location: Colonial Possession

Re: Speak Softly But Carry A Big (Nuclear-Armed) Stick!

Post by liberty »

dales wrote::eh

You know things can happen. The North Korean might see it as a provocation.

I wouldn’t act unless I was willing to carry through and bring hell to earth. But at the moment the last thing we need is another front.
I expected to be placed in an air force combat position such as security police, forward air control, pararescue or E.O.D. I would have liked dog handler. I had heard about the dog Nemo and was highly impressed. “SFB” is sad I didn’t end up in E.O.D.

Post Reply