rubato wrote:Ian A, a lot of wild flailing and dramatic mugging neither connected rhythmically or thematically to the music. Both of which manage to detract from a pretty solidly constructed pop song.
It can't be insecurity which makes him want to 'oversell' the music either. This record came out years and concert tours before 1977.
yrs,
rubato
It's called artistry. You either recognise it or you don't...
Why is it that when Miley Cyrus gets naked and licks a hammer it's 'art' and 'edgy' but when I do it I'm 'drunk' and 'banned from the hardware store'?
rubato wrote:Ian A, a lot of wild flailing and dramatic mugging neither connected rhythmically or thematically to the music. Both of which manage to detract from a pretty solidly constructed pop song.
It can't be insecurity which makes him want to 'oversell' the music either. This record came out years and concert tours before 1977.
yrs,
rubato
It's called artistry. You either recognise it or you don't...
Well if there is any art there it is concealed awfully well.
And now it comes out that he is not actually homeless, either. He has an apartment. And his family continually offers him support, but he chooses to live as a quasi-homeless person.
dgs49 wrote:And now it comes out that he is not actually homeless, either. He has an apartment. And his family continually offers him support, but he chooses to live as a quasi-homeless person.
Fucking nut-ball.
Got a link? I haven't read todays paper yet and didn't see that story in yesterdays. (not that I'm doubting you, just like to see)
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
I have not read any follow-up stories in the local newspaper regarding the "speculation" on the veracity of this homeless/shoeless person. I would think some reporter somewhere here in NY would have found something.