Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Right? Left? Centre?
Political news and debate.
Put your views and articles up for debate and destruction!
User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21464
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Shurely, pscho fancy? :lol:
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Lord Jim »

Well, Ms. Broadmoor, a West Point Graduate, was by no means a "simple minded floozie"...

But being "experienced, confident, sexy, fabulous,".....[to borrow a phrase ;) ]

Is no certain inoculation against doing really stupid things...

Very intelligent, well read, very accomplished, well educated people.....

Can do very stupid things... 8-)

This is an excellent case in point... :?
Last edited by Lord Jim on Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Lord Jim »

To make this point more succinctly, (and I try to drive this point home with Tati, and when he gets a little older, I will try to make the same point with The Little Prince)

"Just because you're smart, doesn't mean you can't do stupid things..."
ImageImageImage

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by dales »

Can stupid people do "smart" things?

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Lord Jim »

Can stupid people do "smart" things?
Rarely, and only by accident or happenstance...

Like when rube occasionally gets something right...pure luck of the draw...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Guinevere »

Lord Jim wrote:Well, Ms. Broadmoor, a West Point Graduate, was by no means a "simple minded floozie"...

But being "experienced, confident, sexy, fabulous,".....[to borrow a phrase ;) ]

Is no certain inoculation against doing really stupid things...

Very intelligent, well read, very accomplished, well educated people.....

Can do very stupid things... 8-)

This is an excellent case in point... :?
I don't disagree at all. I do disagree with the earlier statement that implied that being a 40-something female was sufficient in and of itself to cause some type of mental instability/stupidity.
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Lord Jim »

I do disagree with the earlier statement that implied that being a 40-something female was sufficient in and of itself to cause some type of mental instability/stupidity.
I don't blame you for taking umbrage at that...(It's simply not true)

And I completely disassociate myself from the remarks of the Not-so Honorable Sexist Neanderthal From Santa Cruz who made that statement...
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Guinevere »

Good thing, your spouse could be quite upset had you endorsed those remarks. Practical sort, you are :)
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

User avatar
Lord Jim
Posts: 29716
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: TCTUTKHBDTMDITSAF

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Lord Jim »

Guinevere wrote:Good thing, your spouse could be quite upset had you endorsed those remarks. Practical sort, you are :)

I have nothing but the highest praise for 40 something females.... 8-)
ImageImageImage

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17265
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Scooter »

Can the cast of characters get any weirder?
As the David Petraeus sex scandal continues to ripple across Washington, the New York Times has identified the man at the centre of one of the story’s most bizarre aspects: Frederick W. Humphries is the FBI agent who sent a shirtless photo of himself to Jill Kelley.

Kelley, a volunteer social liaison with military families at MacDill Air Force Base in Florida, had contacted Humphries after receiving harassing emails from Paula Broadwell, warning her to “back off” and to “stay away from my guy” — ostensibly in reference to Petraeus. The complaint triggered the investigation that forced Petraeus to resign his post as CIA director.
Earlier, it was learned that sometime before this investigation, Humphries had sent Kelley photos of him shirtless. Over the summer, FBI executives told Humphries to steer clear of the developing Kelley case because they had concerns he had become too personally involved.

Kelley met Humphries when she attended the bureau’s Citizens’ Academy, an FBI program aimed at showing members of the public at least some of what the FBI does and how it works, Berger said.

The shirtless photo was part of a joke that’s been taken out of context, according to Berger.

“That picture was sent years before Ms. Kelley contacted him about this, and it was sent as part of a larger context of what I would call social relations in which the families would exchange numerous photos of each other,” he told the Times.
Because when I exchange family photos my first thought is to use shirtless ones. :loon :roll: :loon
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

User avatar
RayThom
Posts: 8604
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Longwood Gardens PA 19348

DAMN, THAT'S SOME SCORECARD

Post by RayThom »

Two Four-Star Generals, and what I suspect to be a high ranking FBI agent. I wonder who else she has hypnotized with her exotic charms? Kelley is a "local" girl and the regional media have been interviewing people who knew her in high school. Both her and her sister apparently were high maintenance, gold diggers even back in '93. Snappin' gyro, for sure.
Image
“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.” 

User avatar
Econoline
Posts: 9607
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Econoline »

Never mind that budget crisis over there....

SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX!

(Huh? What fiscal cliff???)



:roll:
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
God @The Tweet of God

User avatar
dales
Posts: 10922
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:13 am
Location: SF Bay Area - NORTH California - USA

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by dales »

Image

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.


yrs,
rubato

User avatar
Scooter
Posts: 17265
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Scooter »

You see, it's hard to keep up, the version I saw earlier today didn't have Shirtless Guy in it.

(is that really the pic he sent, btw? :ok )
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell

User avatar
Guinevere
Posts: 8990
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:01 pm

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Guinevere »

Econoline wrote:Never mind that budget crisis over there....

SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX!

(Huh? What fiscal cliff???)



:roll:
Good lord, could the collective attention span of the Nation for serious issues get any lower?
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké

Andrew D
Posts: 3150
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:01 pm
Location: North California

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Andrew D »

Guinevere wrote:Good lord, could the collective attention span of the Nation for serious issues get any lower?
Lamentably, yes.
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.

User avatar
Gob
Posts: 33646
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:40 am

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by Gob »

“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”

User avatar
MajGenl.Meade
Posts: 21464
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Groot Brakrivier
Contact:

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by MajGenl.Meade »

Scooter wrote:Because when I exchange family photos my first thought is to use shirtless ones.
Which reminds me; anyone want to be on my email list?

;)
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts

oldr_n_wsr
Posts: 10838
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by oldr_n_wsr »

NO!

rubato
Posts: 14245
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 10:14 pm

Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Post by rubato »

Guinevere wrote:

I don't disagree at all. I do disagree with the earlier statement that implied that being a 40-something female was sufficient in and of itself to cause some type of mental instability/stupidity.

I thought we were talking about a particular individual. The effects of ageing effect different people people differently but 40 years is enough time off the clock to be significant.

Part of the diagnosis for gall stones is the 'four f's'; "fat, female, flatulent, and over forty".

"sufficient in and of itself"

Did I say that, or are you just hocking up a hairball?

yrs,
rubato

Post Reply