Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
Shurely, pscho fancy? 
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
Well, Ms. Broadmoor, a West Point Graduate, was by no means a "simple minded floozie"...
But being "experienced, confident, sexy, fabulous,".....[to borrow a phrase
]
Is no certain inoculation against doing really stupid things...
Very intelligent, well read, very accomplished, well educated people.....
Can do very stupid things...
This is an excellent case in point...
But being "experienced, confident, sexy, fabulous,".....[to borrow a phrase
Is no certain inoculation against doing really stupid things...
Very intelligent, well read, very accomplished, well educated people.....
Can do very stupid things...
This is an excellent case in point...
Last edited by Lord Jim on Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
To make this point more succinctly, (and I try to drive this point home with Tati, and when he gets a little older, I will try to make the same point with The Little Prince)
"Just because you're smart, doesn't mean you can't do stupid things..."
"Just because you're smart, doesn't mean you can't do stupid things..."



Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
Can stupid people do "smart" things?
Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
Rarely, and only by accident or happenstance...Can stupid people do "smart" things?
Like when rube occasionally gets something right...pure luck of the draw...



Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
I don't disagree at all. I do disagree with the earlier statement that implied that being a 40-something female was sufficient in and of itself to cause some type of mental instability/stupidity.Lord Jim wrote:Well, Ms. Broadmoor, a West Point Graduate, was by no means a "simple minded floozie"...
But being "experienced, confident, sexy, fabulous,".....[to borrow a phrase]
Is no certain inoculation against doing really stupid things...
Very intelligent, well read, very accomplished, well educated people.....
Can do very stupid things...![]()
This is an excellent case in point...
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
I don't blame you for taking umbrage at that...(It's simply not true)I do disagree with the earlier statement that implied that being a 40-something female was sufficient in and of itself to cause some type of mental instability/stupidity.
And I completely disassociate myself from the remarks of the Not-so Honorable Sexist Neanderthal From Santa Cruz who made that statement...



Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
Good thing, your spouse could be quite upset had you endorsed those remarks. Practical sort, you are 
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
Guinevere wrote:Good thing, your spouse could be quite upset had you endorsed those remarks. Practical sort, you are
I have nothing but the highest praise for 40 something females....



Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
Can the cast of characters get any weirder?

As the David Petraeus sex scandal continues to ripple across Washington, the New York Times has identified the man at the centre of one of the story’s most bizarre aspects: Frederick W. Humphries is the FBI agent who sent a shirtless photo of himself to Jill Kelley.
Kelley, a volunteer social liaison with military families at MacDill Air Force Base in Florida, had contacted Humphries after receiving harassing emails from Paula Broadwell, warning her to “back off” and to “stay away from my guy” — ostensibly in reference to Petraeus. The complaint triggered the investigation that forced Petraeus to resign his post as CIA director.
Because when I exchange family photos my first thought is to use shirtless ones.Earlier, it was learned that sometime before this investigation, Humphries had sent Kelley photos of him shirtless. Over the summer, FBI executives told Humphries to steer clear of the developing Kelley case because they had concerns he had become too personally involved.
Kelley met Humphries when she attended the bureau’s Citizens’ Academy, an FBI program aimed at showing members of the public at least some of what the FBI does and how it works, Berger said.
The shirtless photo was part of a joke that’s been taken out of context, according to Berger.
“That picture was sent years before Ms. Kelley contacted him about this, and it was sent as part of a larger context of what I would call social relations in which the families would exchange numerous photos of each other,” he told the Times.
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell
DAMN, THAT'S SOME SCORECARD
Two Four-Star Generals, and what I suspect to be a high ranking FBI agent. I wonder who else she has hypnotized with her exotic charms? Kelley is a "local" girl and the regional media have been interviewing people who knew her in high school. Both her and her sister apparently were high maintenance, gold diggers even back in '93. Snappin' gyro, for sure.

“In a world whose absurdity appears to be so impenetrable, we simply must reach a greater degree of understanding among us, a greater sincerity.”
- Econoline
- Posts: 9607
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:25 pm
- Location: DeKalb, Illinois...out amidst the corn, soybeans, and Republicans
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
Never mind that budget crisis over there....
SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX!
(Huh? What fiscal cliff???)

SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX!
(Huh? What fiscal cliff???)
People who are wrong are just as sure they're right as people who are right. The only difference is, they're wrong.
— God @The Tweet of God
— God @The Tweet of God
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?

Your collective inability to acknowledge this obvious truth makes you all look like fools.
yrs,
rubato
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
You see, it's hard to keep up, the version I saw earlier today didn't have Shirtless Guy in it.
(is that really the pic he sent, btw?
)
(is that really the pic he sent, btw?
"Hang on while I log in to the James Webb telescope to search the known universe for who the fuck asked you." -- James Fell
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
Good lord, could the collective attention span of the Nation for serious issues get any lower?Econoline wrote:Never mind that budget crisis over there....
SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX SCANDAL! SEX!
(Huh? What fiscal cliff???)
“I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.” ~ Ruth Bader Ginsburg, paraphrasing Sarah Moore Grimké
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
Lamentably, yes.Guinevere wrote:Good lord, could the collective attention span of the Nation for serious issues get any lower?
Reason is valuable only when it performs against the wordless physical background of the universe.
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
“If you trust in yourself, and believe in your dreams, and follow your star. . . you'll still get beaten by people who spent their time working hard and learning things and weren't so lazy.”
- MajGenl.Meade
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Groot Brakrivier
- Contact:
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
Which reminds me; anyone want to be on my email list?Scooter wrote:Because when I exchange family photos my first thought is to use shirtless ones.
For Christianity, by identifying truth with faith, must teach-and, properly understood, does teach-that any interference with the truth is immoral. A Christian with faith has nothing to fear from the facts
-
oldr_n_wsr
- Posts: 10838
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:59 am
Re: Seriously, who gives a flying fuck?
Guinevere wrote:
I don't disagree at all. I do disagree with the earlier statement that implied that being a 40-something female was sufficient in and of itself to cause some type of mental instability/stupidity.
I thought we were talking about a particular individual. The effects of ageing effect different people people differently but 40 years is enough time off the clock to be significant.
Part of the diagnosis for gall stones is the 'four f's'; "fat, female, flatulent, and over forty".
"sufficient in and of itself"
Did I say that, or are you just hocking up a hairball?
yrs,
rubato